-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Afforested farmland vs. forestland: Effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests
J. Cukor, Z. Vacek, R. Linda, RP. Sharma, S. Vacek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- farmy * MeSH
- kůra rostlin * MeSH
- lesy * MeSH
- podnebí * MeSH
- smrk růst a vývoj MeSH
- vysoká zvěř fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) effects of bark stripping and climatic factors on radial growth of Picea abies /L./ Karst., (2) production and structural differences between stands established on the forestland and abandoned farmland (afforested farmland-henceforth, farmland), and (3) interaction among the losses caused by ungulate damages, production, diversity, and soil types. Data acquired from four permanent research plots (PRPs) located on the forestland and eight PRPs on the farmland were used. A number of tree- and stand-level models, stand structural indices, tree-rings, and climate characteristics were analysed to evaluate the hypotheses. The results show significantly higher means of DBH, tree height and basal area on the forestland compared to those on the farmland. There was a larger mean standing stem volume on the forestland (466 m3 ha-1) compared to farmland (770 m3 ha-1). Significant difference was observed between the mean DBH and mean stem volume of healthy trees compared to those of the trees with substantial damage (girth damage >1/3 of stem circumference). A greater extent of the girth damage was found on 86% trees on the farmland, while 54% damage on the forestland. About 62% bark-strip damage was further deteriorated by rot infection on the farmland, while on the forestland such an infection was only for 39% trees. The precipitation significantly positively affected the radial growth of trees that were largely affected by ungulate damages on the farmland.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006038
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200518132258.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0221082 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31415638
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Cukor, Jan $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague -Suchdol, Czech Republic. Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Strnady, Jíloviště, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Afforested farmland vs. forestland: Effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests / $c J. Cukor, Z. Vacek, R. Linda, RP. Sharma, S. Vacek,
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) effects of bark stripping and climatic factors on radial growth of Picea abies /L./ Karst., (2) production and structural differences between stands established on the forestland and abandoned farmland (afforested farmland-henceforth, farmland), and (3) interaction among the losses caused by ungulate damages, production, diversity, and soil types. Data acquired from four permanent research plots (PRPs) located on the forestland and eight PRPs on the farmland were used. A number of tree- and stand-level models, stand structural indices, tree-rings, and climate characteristics were analysed to evaluate the hypotheses. The results show significantly higher means of DBH, tree height and basal area on the forestland compared to those on the farmland. There was a larger mean standing stem volume on the forestland (466 m3 ha-1) compared to farmland (770 m3 ha-1). Significant difference was observed between the mean DBH and mean stem volume of healthy trees compared to those of the trees with substantial damage (girth damage >1/3 of stem circumference). A greater extent of the girth damage was found on 86% trees on the farmland, while 54% damage on the forestland. About 62% bark-strip damage was further deteriorated by rot infection on the farmland, while on the forestland such an infection was only for 39% trees. The precipitation significantly positively affected the radial growth of trees that were largely affected by ungulate damages on the farmland.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a podnebí $7 D002980
- 650 _2
- $a vysoká zvěř $x fyziologie $7 D003670
- 650 12
- $a farmy $7 D000072480
- 650 12
- $a lesy $7 D065928
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a smrk $x růst a vývoj $7 D028222
- 650 12
- $a kůra rostlin $7 D024301
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vacek, Zdeněk $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Linda, Rostislav $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sharma, Ram Prasad $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vacek, Stanislav $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 8 (2019), s. e0221082
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31415638 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200518132257 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1524896 $s 1096094
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 14 $c 8 $d e0221082 $e 20190815 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511