-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Genetic marker-based multi-locus sequence analysis for classification, genotyping, and phylogenetics of the family Bifidobacteriaceae as an alternative approach to phylogenomics
C. Mekadim, V. Bunešová, E. Vlková, Z. Hroncová, J. Killer,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000460
Project Excellence
QJ1610248
Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research
QJ1510338
Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research
CIGA 20182018
internal university grant application
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2011-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- Actinobacteria klasifikace genetika MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny genetika MeSH
- bakteriologické techniky metody MeSH
- genotypizační techniky metody MeSH
- multilokusová sekvenční typizace metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
Bifidobacteria are widely known for their probiotic potential; however, little is known regarding the ecological significance and potential probiotic effects of the phylogenetically related 'scardovial' genera (Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bombiscardovia, Galliscardovia, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia) and Gardnerella classified with bifidobacteria within the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Accurate classification and genotyping of bacteria using certain housekeeping genes is possible, whilst current phylogenomic analyses allow for extremely precise classification. Studies of applicable genetic markers may provide results comparable to those obtained from phylogenomic analyses of the family Bifidobacteriaceae. Segments of the glyS (624 nucleotides), pheS (555 nucleotides), rpsA (630 nucleotides), and rpsB (432 nucleotides) genes and their concatenated sequence were explored. The mean glyS, pheS, rpsB and rpsA gene sequence similarities calculated for Bifidobacterium taxa were 84.8, 85.2, 90.2 and 86.8%, respectively. Interestingly, the average value of the Average Nucleotide Identity among 67 type strains of the family Bifidobacteriaceae (84.70%) calculated based on values published recently was in agreement with the average pairwise similarity (84.6%) among 75 type strains of Bifidobacteriaceae family computed in this study using the concatenated sequences of four gene fragments. Similar to phylogenomic analyses, several gene sequence and phylogenetic analyses revealed that concatenated gene regions allow for classification of Bifidobacteriaceae strains into particular phylogenetic clusters and groups. Phylogeny reconstructed from the concatenated sequences assisted in defining two novel phylogenetic groups, the Bifidobacterium psychraerophilum group consisting of B. psychraerophilum, Bifidobacterium crudilactis and Bifidobacterium aquikefiri species and the Bifidobacterium bombi group consisting of B. bombi, Bifidobacterium bohemicum and Bifidobacterium commune.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006090
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250430090853.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10482-019-01307-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31368048
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Mekadim, Chahrazed $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Krč, Czech Republic. Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Genetic marker-based multi-locus sequence analysis for classification, genotyping, and phylogenetics of the family Bifidobacteriaceae as an alternative approach to phylogenomics / $c C. Mekadim, V. Bunešová, E. Vlková, Z. Hroncová, J. Killer,
- 520 9_
- $a Bifidobacteria are widely known for their probiotic potential; however, little is known regarding the ecological significance and potential probiotic effects of the phylogenetically related 'scardovial' genera (Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bombiscardovia, Galliscardovia, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia) and Gardnerella classified with bifidobacteria within the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Accurate classification and genotyping of bacteria using certain housekeeping genes is possible, whilst current phylogenomic analyses allow for extremely precise classification. Studies of applicable genetic markers may provide results comparable to those obtained from phylogenomic analyses of the family Bifidobacteriaceae. Segments of the glyS (624 nucleotides), pheS (555 nucleotides), rpsA (630 nucleotides), and rpsB (432 nucleotides) genes and their concatenated sequence were explored. The mean glyS, pheS, rpsB and rpsA gene sequence similarities calculated for Bifidobacterium taxa were 84.8, 85.2, 90.2 and 86.8%, respectively. Interestingly, the average value of the Average Nucleotide Identity among 67 type strains of the family Bifidobacteriaceae (84.70%) calculated based on values published recently was in agreement with the average pairwise similarity (84.6%) among 75 type strains of Bifidobacteriaceae family computed in this study using the concatenated sequences of four gene fragments. Similar to phylogenomic analyses, several gene sequence and phylogenetic analyses revealed that concatenated gene regions allow for classification of Bifidobacteriaceae strains into particular phylogenetic clusters and groups. Phylogeny reconstructed from the concatenated sequences assisted in defining two novel phylogenetic groups, the Bifidobacterium psychraerophilum group consisting of B. psychraerophilum, Bifidobacterium crudilactis and Bifidobacterium aquikefiri species and the Bifidobacterium bombi group consisting of B. bombi, Bifidobacterium bohemicum and Bifidobacterium commune.
- 650 _2
- $a Actinobacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D039903
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální proteiny $x genetika $7 D001426
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriologické techniky $x metody $7 D001431
- 650 _2
- $a genotypizační techniky $x metody $7 D060005
- 650 _2
- $a multilokusová sekvenční typizace $x metody $7 D058885
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bunešová, Věra $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vlková, Eva, $d 1977- $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Suchdol, Czech Republic. $7 xx0035179
- 700 1_
- $a Hroncová, Zuzana $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Killer, Jiří $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Krč, Czech Republic. killer.jiri@seznam.cz. Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Suchdol, Czech Republic. killer.jiri@seznam.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000481 $t Antonie van Leeuwenhoek $x 1572-9699 $g Roč. 112, č. 12 (2019), s. 1785-1800
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31368048 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250430090848 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1524948 $s 1096146
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 112 $c 12 $d 1785-1800 $e 20190731 $i 1572-9699 $m Antonie van Leeuwenhoek $n Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek $x MED00000481
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000460 $p Project Excellence
- GRA __
- $a QJ1610248 $p Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research
- GRA __
- $a QJ1510338 $p Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research
- GRA __
- $a CIGA 20182018 $p internal university grant application
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511