Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The clinical benefit of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for detection of copy number variants in Czech children with intellectual disability and developmental delay

M. Wayhelova, J. Smetana, V. Vallova, E. Hladilkova, H. Filkova, M. Hanakova, M. Vilemova, P. Nikolova, B. Gromesova, R. Gaillyova, P. Kuglik,

. 2019 ; 12 (1) : 111. [pub] 20190723

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20006120

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis has been shown to be a valuable and cost effective assay for elucidating copy number variants (CNVs) in children with intellectual disability and developmental delay (ID/DD). METHODS: In our study, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) analysis using oligonucleotide-based platforms in 542 Czech patients with ID/DD, autism spectrum disorders and multiple congenital abnormalities. Prior to the array-CGH analysis, all the patients were first examined karyotypically using G-banding. The presence of CNVs and their putative derivation was confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and predominantly relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: In total, 5.9% (32/542) patients were positive for karyotypic abnormalities. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs were identified in 17.7% of them (96/542), variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) were detected in 4.8% (26/542) and likely benign CNVs in 9.2% of cases (50/542). We identified 6.6% (36/542) patients with known recurrent microdeletion (24 cases) and microduplication (12 cases) syndromes, as well as 4.8% (26/542) patients with non-recurrent rare microdeletions (21 cases) and microduplications (5 cases). In the group of patients with submicroscopic pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (13.3%; 68/510) we identified 91.2% (62/68) patients with one CNV, 5.9% (4/68) patients with two likely independent CNVs and 2.9% (2/68) patients with two CNVs resulting from cryptic unbalanced translocations. Of all detected CNVs, 21% (31/147) had a de novo origin, 51% (75/147) were inherited and 28% (41/147) of unknown origin. In our cohort pathogenic/likely pathogenic microdeletions were more frequent than microduplications (69%; 51/74 vs. 31%; 23/74) ranging in size from 0.395 Mb to 10.676 Mb (microdeletions) and 0.544 Mb to 8.156 Mb (microduplications), but their sizes were not significantly different (P = 0.83). The pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (median 2.663 Mb) were significantly larger than benign CNVs (median 0.394 Mb) (P < 0.00001) and likewise the pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (median 2.663 Mb) were significantly larger in size than VOUS (median 0.469 Mb) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the benefit of array-CGH in the current clinical genetic diagnostics leading to identification of the genetic cause of ID/DD in affected children.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20006120
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200526130523.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12920-019-0559-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31337399
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Wayhelova, Marketa $u Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 267/2, Brno, Czech Republic. marketa.wayhelova@mail.muni.cz. Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic. marketa.wayhelova@mail.muni.cz.
245    14
$a The clinical benefit of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for detection of copy number variants in Czech children with intellectual disability and developmental delay / $c M. Wayhelova, J. Smetana, V. Vallova, E. Hladilkova, H. Filkova, M. Hanakova, M. Vilemova, P. Nikolova, B. Gromesova, R. Gaillyova, P. Kuglik,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis has been shown to be a valuable and cost effective assay for elucidating copy number variants (CNVs) in children with intellectual disability and developmental delay (ID/DD). METHODS: In our study, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) analysis using oligonucleotide-based platforms in 542 Czech patients with ID/DD, autism spectrum disorders and multiple congenital abnormalities. Prior to the array-CGH analysis, all the patients were first examined karyotypically using G-banding. The presence of CNVs and their putative derivation was confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and predominantly relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: In total, 5.9% (32/542) patients were positive for karyotypic abnormalities. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs were identified in 17.7% of them (96/542), variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) were detected in 4.8% (26/542) and likely benign CNVs in 9.2% of cases (50/542). We identified 6.6% (36/542) patients with known recurrent microdeletion (24 cases) and microduplication (12 cases) syndromes, as well as 4.8% (26/542) patients with non-recurrent rare microdeletions (21 cases) and microduplications (5 cases). In the group of patients with submicroscopic pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (13.3%; 68/510) we identified 91.2% (62/68) patients with one CNV, 5.9% (4/68) patients with two likely independent CNVs and 2.9% (2/68) patients with two CNVs resulting from cryptic unbalanced translocations. Of all detected CNVs, 21% (31/147) had a de novo origin, 51% (75/147) were inherited and 28% (41/147) of unknown origin. In our cohort pathogenic/likely pathogenic microdeletions were more frequent than microduplications (69%; 51/74 vs. 31%; 23/74) ranging in size from 0.395 Mb to 10.676 Mb (microdeletions) and 0.544 Mb to 8.156 Mb (microduplications), but their sizes were not significantly different (P = 0.83). The pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (median 2.663 Mb) were significantly larger than benign CNVs (median 0.394 Mb) (P < 0.00001) and likewise the pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (median 2.663 Mb) were significantly larger in size than VOUS (median 0.469 Mb) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the benefit of array-CGH in the current clinical genetic diagnostics leading to identification of the genetic cause of ID/DD in affected children.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    12
$a srovnávací genomová hybridizace $7 D055028
650    12
$a variabilita počtu kopií segmentů DNA $7 D056915
650    _2
$a vývojové poruchy u dětí $x genetika $7 D002658
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a mentální retardace $x genetika $7 D008607
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a sekvenční analýza hybridizací s uspořádaným souborem oligonukleotidů $7 D020411
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Smetana, Jan $u Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 267/2, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vallova, Vladimira $u Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 267/2, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hladilkova, Eva $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Filkova, Hana $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hanakova, Marta $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vilemova, Marcela $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nikolova, Petra $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gromesova, Barbora $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gaillyova, Renata $u Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kuglik, Petr $u Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 267/2, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brno, Cernopolni 212/9, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00172947 $t BMC medical genomics $x 1755-8794 $g Roč. 12, č. 1 (2019), s. 111
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31337399 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200526130519 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1524978 $s 1096176
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 12 $c 1 $d 111 $e 20190723 $i 1755-8794 $m BMC medical genomics $n BMC Med Genomics $x MED00172947
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...