-
Something wrong with this record ?
An overview of the ATOMS generations: port types, functionality and risk factors
S. Mühlstädt, A. Friedl, R. Zachoval, N. Mohammed, A. Schumann, G. Theil, P. Fornara,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
- MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Postoperative Complications epidemiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Suburethral Slings * adverse effects classification MeSH
- Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: We report the multicentre comparison of the different port types of the adjustable transobturator male incontinence system (ATOMS, A.M.I., Austria). METHODS: Between 10/09 and 10/16, 383 patients received an ATOMS. Of these, 63% received the inguinal port (IP, 2009-2013), 23% the intraoperative manually connectable scrotal port (SP, 2013-2015), and 14% the pre-connected fully silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP, 2014-2016). During the follow-up period, continence parameters, pain and quality of life ratings and postoperative port-associated complications were evaluated and compared. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7®, p < 0.05 considered as significant. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative parameters (BMI, ASA score, previous radiotherapy/incontinence surgery, and preoperative 24-h pad count/24-h pad test), no significant differences were found. Regarding perioperative parameters, the mean operative time was significantly shorter for the SP and SSP (IP vs. SP p < 0.0001, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0048, SP vs. SSP p = 0.697). Comparison of the postoperative 24-h pad count, 24-h pad test and uroflowmetry data revealed no significant differences. However, the postoperative ICIQ-SF score was significantly better for the SSP (p = 0.0232) than the SP. A significant difference was also observed in postoperative port-associated complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, we identified one grade I and 29 grade IIIb complications for the IP, 1 grade I and 6 grade IIIb complications for the SP, but only 2 grade IIIb complications for the SSP (IP vs. SP p = 0.0231, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0189 and SP vs. SSP p = 0.0453). CONCLUSION: The SSP shows fewer complications while retaining comparable efficacy.
Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation Martin Luther University Halle Germany
Department of Urology Hospital Göttlicher Heiland Vienna Austria
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006743
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200522103557.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00345-018-2548-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30377812
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Mühlstädt, Sandra $u Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. sandra.muehlstaedt@uk-halle.de.
- 245 13
- $a An overview of the ATOMS generations: port types, functionality and risk factors / $c S. Mühlstädt, A. Friedl, R. Zachoval, N. Mohammed, A. Schumann, G. Theil, P. Fornara,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: We report the multicentre comparison of the different port types of the adjustable transobturator male incontinence system (ATOMS, A.M.I., Austria). METHODS: Between 10/09 and 10/16, 383 patients received an ATOMS. Of these, 63% received the inguinal port (IP, 2009-2013), 23% the intraoperative manually connectable scrotal port (SP, 2013-2015), and 14% the pre-connected fully silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP, 2014-2016). During the follow-up period, continence parameters, pain and quality of life ratings and postoperative port-associated complications were evaluated and compared. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7®, p < 0.05 considered as significant. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative parameters (BMI, ASA score, previous radiotherapy/incontinence surgery, and preoperative 24-h pad count/24-h pad test), no significant differences were found. Regarding perioperative parameters, the mean operative time was significantly shorter for the SP and SSP (IP vs. SP p < 0.0001, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0048, SP vs. SSP p = 0.697). Comparison of the postoperative 24-h pad count, 24-h pad test and uroflowmetry data revealed no significant differences. However, the postoperative ICIQ-SF score was significantly better for the SSP (p = 0.0232) than the SP. A significant difference was also observed in postoperative port-associated complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, we identified one grade I and 29 grade IIIb complications for the IP, 1 grade I and 6 grade IIIb complications for the SP, but only 2 grade IIIb complications for the SSP (IP vs. SP p = 0.0231, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0189 and SP vs. SSP p = 0.0453). CONCLUSION: The SSP shows fewer complications while retaining comparable efficacy.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 12
- $a suburetrální pásky $x škodlivé účinky $x klasifikace $7 D053825
- 650 _2
- $a inkontinence moči $x chirurgie $7 D014549
- 650 _2
- $a urologické chirurgické výkony u mužů $7 D013521
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Friedl, Alexander $u Department of Urology, Hospital Göttlicher Heiland, Vienna, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Zachoval, Roman $u Department of Urology and 1st and 3rd Medical Faculty, Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mohammed, Nasreldin $u Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Schumann, André $u Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Theil, Gerit $u Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Fornara, Paolo $u Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 37, č. 8 (2019), s. 1679-1686
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30377812 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200522103556 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525601 $s 1096799
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 37 $c 8 $d 1679-1686 $e 20181030 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511
