-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Férovost rekognice
[Eyewitness identification fairness]
Hana Trojanová, Hedvika Boukalová
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2006-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
- MeSH
- kriminologie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rozpoznání obličeje MeSH
- rozpoznávání (psychologie) * klasifikace MeSH
- rozpoznávání identity MeSH
- zločin psychologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Článek shrnuje vybrané poznatky k problematice férovosti kriminalistické rekognice (identifikace očitým svědkem). Stručně se věnuje historii zkoumání této problematiky. Zaměřuje se na důležité aspekty férovosti, jimiž je přítomnost pachatele v rekognici a roli popisu pachatele při vytváření rekognice. Věnuje se experimentálnímu ověření kroků vytváření rekognice a v závěru také způsobům výpočtu férovosti rekognice.
Criminalistic recognition is a very important source of information in the criminal proceedings, but it can be a source of many mistakes. It involves a recognition of the previously perceived object by the identifying person, with the aim of identifying the object. Identifying a person as one of its forms is very interesting from a psychological point of view, and a deeper understanding of the factors that appear throughout the process contributes to the prevention of erroneous procedures. The article deals with one of these effects, the so-called line-up fairness. A fair line-up exposes the suspect to be identified by the ratio: 1 / number of subjects. Unfair lineup increases the possibility of his / her identification, regardless of his / her guilt. The suspect involved in the line-up need not be the perpetrator. The article summarizes the history of this phenomenon, deals with the research of line-up fairness from the psychological point of view, focuses on the key variables of line-up fairness, introduces the procedure of creating a fair lineup and brings information about calculating the line-up fairness. Among the principles that Anglo-Saxon practice regards as key to the line-up fairness there are: the use of a sufficient number of recruits who are similar in physical appearance to the extent that the suspect’s identity is not obvious to the identifying person. While sufficient is meant in England eight, in the US six people. In the Czech Republic, the minimum required is three foils. Fillers should be at least five and no more than eight. Given the diversity of facial and body features in general, it is problematic to specify clearly the degree of similarity and how to build optimally a fair line-up.
Eyewitness identification fairness
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20012393
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127134229.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200815s2020 xr f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Trojanová, Hana $7 xx0251733 $u Katedra psychologie FF UK, Praha
- 245 10
- $a Férovost rekognice / $c Hana Trojanová, Hedvika Boukalová
- 246 31
- $a Eyewitness identification fairness
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 3_
- $a Článek shrnuje vybrané poznatky k problematice férovosti kriminalistické rekognice (identifikace očitým svědkem). Stručně se věnuje historii zkoumání této problematiky. Zaměřuje se na důležité aspekty férovosti, jimiž je přítomnost pachatele v rekognici a roli popisu pachatele při vytváření rekognice. Věnuje se experimentálnímu ověření kroků vytváření rekognice a v závěru také způsobům výpočtu férovosti rekognice.
- 520 9_
- $a Criminalistic recognition is a very important source of information in the criminal proceedings, but it can be a source of many mistakes. It involves a recognition of the previously perceived object by the identifying person, with the aim of identifying the object. Identifying a person as one of its forms is very interesting from a psychological point of view, and a deeper understanding of the factors that appear throughout the process contributes to the prevention of erroneous procedures. The article deals with one of these effects, the so-called line-up fairness. A fair line-up exposes the suspect to be identified by the ratio: 1 / number of subjects. Unfair lineup increases the possibility of his / her identification, regardless of his / her guilt. The suspect involved in the line-up need not be the perpetrator. The article summarizes the history of this phenomenon, deals with the research of line-up fairness from the psychological point of view, focuses on the key variables of line-up fairness, introduces the procedure of creating a fair lineup and brings information about calculating the line-up fairness. Among the principles that Anglo-Saxon practice regards as key to the line-up fairness there are: the use of a sufficient number of recruits who are similar in physical appearance to the extent that the suspect’s identity is not obvious to the identifying person. While sufficient is meant in England eight, in the US six people. In the Czech Republic, the minimum required is three foils. Fillers should be at least five and no more than eight. Given the diversity of facial and body features in general, it is problematic to specify clearly the degree of similarity and how to build optimally a fair line-up.
- 650 12
- $a rozpoznávání (psychologie) $x klasifikace $7 D021641
- 650 _2
- $a zločin $x psychologie $7 D003415
- 650 _2
- $a kriminologie $x metody $7 D003418
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznání obličeje $7 D000066499
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznávání identity $7 D000087023
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Boukalová, Hedvika, $d 1979- $7 xx0029627 $u Katedra psychologie FF UK, Praha
- 773 0_
- $t Československá psychologie $x 0009-062X $g Roč. 64, č. 3 (2020), s. 360-370 $w MED00010994
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 2526 $c 618 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200813140223 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127134225 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1553919 $s 1102513
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 64 $c 3 $d 360-370 $i 0009-062X $m Československá psychologie $x MED00010994
- LZP __
- $c NLK125 $d 20220124 $a NLK 2020-31/dk