-
Something wrong with this record ?
Neighbourhood socioeconomic indicators and depressive symptoms in the Czech Republic: a population based study
J. Pikhartova, T. Chandola, R. Kubinova, M. Bobak, A. Nicholson, H. Pikhart,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
064947/Z/01/Z
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
081081/Z/06/Z
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
1R01 AG23522-01
NIA NIH HHS - United States
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1956
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 2018-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 2018-12-31
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 2018-12-31
- MeSH
- Residence Characteristics * MeSH
- Poverty * MeSH
- Depression economics epidemiology psychology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Logistic Models MeSH
- Unemployment MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Educational Status MeSH
- Population Surveillance MeSH
- Health Surveys MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Previous research shows only limited evidence on the contextual (neighbourhood-based) socioeconomic influences on mental health and depression. We investigated the association between individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic characteristics and depressive symptoms in the Czech Republic. METHODS: Dichotomized CESD score of depressive symptoms was used as the outcome in a random sample of 3534 men and 4082 women aged 45-69 years in the Czech HAPIEE Study. 220 small areas were characterized by the proportion of university educated persons and the proportion of unemployed from the economically active population in the 2001 Census. Multilevel logistic regression was used for the analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for individual-level variables, the effects of area-based characteristics were largely eliminated. The strongest area-based effect was that of the proportion of university educated persons; the ORs for 2(nd), 3(rd) and 4(th) quartile, compared with the 1(st) quartile, were 1.02, 0.93, and 0.82, respectively (p-value for trend 0.06). There were no cross-level interactions between socioeconomic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of neighbourhood characteristics in this study were largely explained by individual socioeconomic variables.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20014365
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200921152948.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200918s2009 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00038-009-8029-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19396398
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Pikhartova, Jitka $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. h.pikhart@ucl.ac.uk
- 245 10
- $a Neighbourhood socioeconomic indicators and depressive symptoms in the Czech Republic: a population based study / $c J. Pikhartova, T. Chandola, R. Kubinova, M. Bobak, A. Nicholson, H. Pikhart,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Previous research shows only limited evidence on the contextual (neighbourhood-based) socioeconomic influences on mental health and depression. We investigated the association between individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic characteristics and depressive symptoms in the Czech Republic. METHODS: Dichotomized CESD score of depressive symptoms was used as the outcome in a random sample of 3534 men and 4082 women aged 45-69 years in the Czech HAPIEE Study. 220 small areas were characterized by the proportion of university educated persons and the proportion of unemployed from the economically active population in the 2001 Census. Multilevel logistic regression was used for the analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for individual-level variables, the effects of area-based characteristics were largely eliminated. The strongest area-based effect was that of the proportion of university educated persons; the ORs for 2(nd), 3(rd) and 4(th) quartile, compared with the 1(st) quartile, were 1.02, 0.93, and 0.82, respectively (p-value for trend 0.06). There were no cross-level interactions between socioeconomic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of neighbourhood characteristics in this study were largely explained by individual socioeconomic variables.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x ekonomika $x epidemiologie $x psychologie $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň vzdělání $7 D004522
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotnické přehledy $7 D006306
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a logistické modely $7 D016015
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a surveillance populace $7 D011159
- 650 12
- $a chudoba $7 D011203
- 650 12
- $a charakteristiky bydlení $7 D012111
- 650 _2
- $a nezaměstnanost $7 D014478
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Chandola, Tarani
- 700 1_
- $a Kubinova, Ruzena
- 700 1_
- $a Bobak, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Nicholson, Amanda
- 700 1_
- $a Pikhart, Hynek
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188766 $t International journal of public health $x 1661-8564 $g Roč. 54, č. 4 (2009), s. 283-293
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19396398 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200918 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200921152947 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1565217 $s 1104523
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 54 $c 4 $d 283-293 $e - $i 1661-8564 $m International journal of public health $n Int J Public Health $x MED00188766
- GRA __
- $a 064947/Z/01/Z $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 081081/Z/06/Z $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 1R01 AG23522-01 $p NIA NIH HHS $2 United States
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200918