Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Phase I/II study of pemetrexed with or without ABT-751 in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

CM. Rudin, A. Mauer, M. Smakal, R. Juergens, S. Spelda, M. Wertheim, A. Coates, E. McKeegan, P. Ansell, X. Zhou, J. Qian, R. Pradhan, B. Dowell, A. Krivoshik, G. Gordon,

. 2011 ; 29 (8) : 1075-1082. [pub] 20110207

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase I, Clinical Trial, Phase II, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
P30 CA006973 NCI NIH HHS - United States

PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an antimitotic and vascular disrupting agent with potent preclinical anticancer activity. We conducted a phase I and randomized double-blind phase II study of pemetrexed with ABT-751 or placebo in patients with recurrent advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients received intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 and oral ABT-751 or placebo days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end point included overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of ABT-751 with pemetrexed is 200 mg. Fatigue, constipation, anemia, nausea, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities in both study arms. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Median PFS in the ABT-751 arm was 2.3 months versus 1.9 for placebo (P = .819, log-rank) for the intention-to-treat population. However, differences in PFS (P = .112, log-rank) and OS (P = .034, log-rank; median 3.3 v 8.1 months) favoring ABT-751 were seen in the squamous NSCLC subgroup. Baseline circulating tumor cell concentrations were predictive of improved OS (P = .013). Changes from baseline of greater than 20% in plasma levels of placenta growth factor (P = .056), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (P = .03), and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (P = .01) were markers best associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: Addition of ABT-751 to pemetrexed is well-tolerated, but does not improve outcome in unselected patients with recurrent NSCLC. ABT-751 may have therapeutic potential in squamous NSCLC. Exploratory cellular and molecular analyses in this study identified biomarkers that may correlate with survival.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014996
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929120615.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2011 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5944 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21300929
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Rudin, Charles M $u The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, David H. Koch Cancer Research Building 2, 1550 Orleans St, Rm 544, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. rudin@jhmi.edu
245    10
$a Phase I/II study of pemetrexed with or without ABT-751 in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer / $c CM. Rudin, A. Mauer, M. Smakal, R. Juergens, S. Spelda, M. Wertheim, A. Coates, E. McKeegan, P. Ansell, X. Zhou, J. Qian, R. Pradhan, B. Dowell, A. Krivoshik, G. Gordon,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an antimitotic and vascular disrupting agent with potent preclinical anticancer activity. We conducted a phase I and randomized double-blind phase II study of pemetrexed with ABT-751 or placebo in patients with recurrent advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients received intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 and oral ABT-751 or placebo days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end point included overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of ABT-751 with pemetrexed is 200 mg. Fatigue, constipation, anemia, nausea, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities in both study arms. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Median PFS in the ABT-751 arm was 2.3 months versus 1.9 for placebo (P = .819, log-rank) for the intention-to-treat population. However, differences in PFS (P = .112, log-rank) and OS (P = .034, log-rank; median 3.3 v 8.1 months) favoring ABT-751 were seen in the squamous NSCLC subgroup. Baseline circulating tumor cell concentrations were predictive of improved OS (P = .013). Changes from baseline of greater than 20% in plasma levels of placenta growth factor (P = .056), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (P = .03), and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (P = .01) were markers best associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: Addition of ABT-751 to pemetrexed is well-tolerated, but does not improve outcome in unselected patients with recurrent NSCLC. ABT-751 may have therapeutic potential in squamous NSCLC. Exploratory cellular and molecular analyses in this study identified biomarkers that may correlate with survival.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $x farmakokinetika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $x krev $7 D014408
650    _2
$a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x krev $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $x sekundární $7 D002289
650    _2
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a glutamáty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D005971
650    _2
$a guanin $x aplikace a dávkování $x analogy a deriváty $7 D006147
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
650    _2
$a nádory plic $x krev $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $x patologie $7 D008175
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pemetrexed $7 D000068437
650    _2
$a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a sulfonamidy $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D013449
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze I $7 D017426
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mauer, Ann
700    1_
$a Smakal, Martin
700    1_
$a Juergens, Rosalyn
700    1_
$a Spelda, Stanislav
700    1_
$a Wertheim, Michael
700    1_
$a Coates, Andrew
700    1_
$a McKeegan, Evelyn
700    1_
$a Ansell, Peter
700    1_
$a Zhou, Xiangdong
700    1_
$a Qian, Jane
700    1_
$a Pradhan, Rajendra
700    1_
$a Dowell, Barry
700    1_
$a Krivoshik, Andrew
700    1_
$a Gordon, Gary
773    0_
$w MED00002596 $t Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology $x 1527-7755 $g Roč. 29, č. 8 (2011), s. 1075-1082
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21300929 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929120611 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567845 $s 1105156
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 29 $c 8 $d 1075-1082 $e 20110207 $i 1527-7755 $m Journal of clinical oncology $n J. clin. Oncol. $x MED00002596
GRA    __
$a P30 CA006973 $p NCI NIH HHS $2 United States
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...