-
Something wrong with this record ?
Determination of beta-defensin genomic copy number in different populations: a comparison of three methods
P. Fode, C. Jespersgaard, RJ. Hardwick, H. Bogle, M. Theisen, D. Dodoo, M. Lenicek, L. Vitek, A. Vieira, J. Freitas, PS. Andersen, EJ. Hollox,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
G0801123
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
087663
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
GO801123
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- beta-Defensins genetics MeSH
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease MeSH
- Genome, Human genetics MeSH
- Gene Dosage * MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Chromosome Mapping methods MeSH
- Molecular Sequence Data MeSH
- Population MeSH
- Genetics, Population methods MeSH
- Base Sequence MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Denmark MeSH
- Ghana MeSH
- Portugal MeSH
- United Kingdom MeSH
BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting reports in the literature on association of gene copy number with disease, including CCL3L1 and HIV susceptibility, and β-defensins and Crohn's disease. Quantification of precise gene copy numbers is important in order to define any association of gene copy number with disease. At present, real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR) is the most commonly used method to determine gene copy number, however the Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT) is being used in more and more laboratories. FINDINGS: In this study we compare a Pyrosequencing-based Paralogue Ratio Test (PPRT) for determining beta-defensin gene copy number with two currently used methods for gene copy number determination, QPCR and triplex PRT by typing five different cohorts (UK, Danish, Portuguese, Ghanaian and Czech) of DNA from a total of 576 healthy individuals. We found a systematic measurement bias between DNA cohorts revealed by QPCR, but not by the PRT-based methods. Using PRT, copy number ranged from 2 to 9 copies, with a modal copy number of 4 in all populations. CONCLUSIONS: QPCR is very sensitive to quality of the template DNA, generating systematic biases that could produce false-positive or negative disease associations. Both triplex PRT and PPRT do not show this systematic bias, and type copy number within the correct range, although triplex PRT appears to be a more precise and accurate method to type beta-defensin copy number.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20015002
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200929120608.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200922s2011 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0016768 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21364933
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Fode, Peder $u Department for Microbiological Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 245 10
- $a Determination of beta-defensin genomic copy number in different populations: a comparison of three methods / $c P. Fode, C. Jespersgaard, RJ. Hardwick, H. Bogle, M. Theisen, D. Dodoo, M. Lenicek, L. Vitek, A. Vieira, J. Freitas, PS. Andersen, EJ. Hollox,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting reports in the literature on association of gene copy number with disease, including CCL3L1 and HIV susceptibility, and β-defensins and Crohn's disease. Quantification of precise gene copy numbers is important in order to define any association of gene copy number with disease. At present, real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR) is the most commonly used method to determine gene copy number, however the Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT) is being used in more and more laboratories. FINDINGS: In this study we compare a Pyrosequencing-based Paralogue Ratio Test (PPRT) for determining beta-defensin gene copy number with two currently used methods for gene copy number determination, QPCR and triplex PRT by typing five different cohorts (UK, Danish, Portuguese, Ghanaian and Czech) of DNA from a total of 576 healthy individuals. We found a systematic measurement bias between DNA cohorts revealed by QPCR, but not by the PRT-based methods. Using PRT, copy number ranged from 2 to 9 copies, with a modal copy number of 4 in all populations. CONCLUSIONS: QPCR is very sensitive to quality of the template DNA, generating systematic biases that could produce false-positive or negative disease associations. Both triplex PRT and PPRT do not show this systematic bias, and type copy number within the correct range, although triplex PRT appears to be a more precise and accurate method to type beta-defensin copy number.
- 650 _2
- $a sekvence nukleotidů $7 D001483
- 650 _2
- $a mapování chromozomů $x metody $7 D002874
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 12
- $a genová dávka $7 D018628
- 650 _2
- $a genetická predispozice k nemoci $7 D020022
- 650 _2
- $a populační genetika $x metody $7 D005828
- 650 _2
- $a genom lidský $x genetika $7 D015894
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární sekvence - údaje $7 D008969
- 650 _2
- $a populace $7 D011153
- 650 _2
- $a beta-defensiny $x genetika $7 D023083
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Dánsko $7 D003718
- 651 _2
- $a Ghana $7 D005869
- 651 _2
- $a Portugalsko $7 D011174
- 651 _2
- $a Spojené království $7 D006113
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jespersgaard, Cathrine
- 700 1_
- $a Hardwick, Robert J
- 700 1_
- $a Bogle, Helen
- 700 1_
- $a Theisen, Michael
- 700 1_
- $a Dodoo, Daniel
- 700 1_
- $a Lenicek, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Vitek, Libor
- 700 1_
- $a Vieira, Ana
- 700 1_
- $a Freitas, Joao
- 700 1_
- $a Andersen, Paal Skytt
- 700 1_
- $a Hollox, Edward J
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 6, č. 2 (2011), s. e16768
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21364933 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200922 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200929120604 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1567849 $s 1105162
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 6 $c 2 $d e16768 $e 20110222 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- GRA __
- $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a G0801123 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 087663 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a GO801123 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200922