Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Outcome of Surgical and Conservative Treatment of Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study [Výsledky chirurgické a konzervativní léčby pacientů s ramenním impingement syndromem - prospektivní srovnávací klinická studie]

H. C. Köhler, T. Tischer, C. Hacke, A. Gutcke, C. Schulze

. 2020 ; 87 (5) : 340-345.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Subacromial impingement is one of the most common reasons for shoulder pain. The surgical management of this condition has recently become the focus of criticism because of the rising number of surgical procedures and the lack of superiority of surgical over conservative treatment. In this prospective comparative study, we compared standardised conservative care with surgical treatment and placed special emphasis on the patients' ability to work. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 106 patients (25 women, 81 men; mean age: 45.4 12.3 years) were included in this prospective comparative clinical study. Patients in the non-operative arm (n = 42) received standardised physiotherapy. Patients in the surgical arm (n = 38) underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression. All patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months. Shoulder function (Constant score), pain (Numerical Rating Scale), and the duration of inability to work were assessed. RESULTS Shoulder function and pain improved significantly with both kinds of treatment. At no time of follow up we detected significant differences between the two treatment options. An analysis of the patients' ability to work showed that conservative treatment was superior to surgical treatment at 3-month follow-up (0.3 versus 5.0 weeks; p < 0.001) and between 4 and 6-month after intervention (0.2 versus 1.6 weeks; p = 0.032). DISCUSSION In the study presented here, significant improvements in function (Constant score) and pain (NRS) were achieved in both the non-operative and the surgical arm. There were no significant differences between the two groups at any time point. These results are similar to those reported by other authors in recent studies. Unlike other research work, however, our study demonstrated a major difference in the development and duration of inability to work. CONCLUSIONS Conservative and surgical treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome led to similar outcomes for shoulder pain and function at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention. However, patients who were managed conservatively returned to work significantly earlier than patients who underwent surgery. Key words: subacromial impingement, shoulder, constant score, pain, ability to work.

Výsledky chirurgické a konzervativní léčby pacientů s ramenním impingement syndromem - prospektivní srovnávací klinická studie

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20017794
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210211140231.0
007      
ta
008      
201110s2020 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2020/051
035    __
$a (PubMed)33146602
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Köhler, H-C. $u Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany; Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Armed Forces Hospital of Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany
245    10
$a Outcome of Surgical and Conservative Treatment of Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study / $c H. C. Köhler, T. Tischer, C. Hacke, A. Gutcke, C. Schulze
246    31
$a Výsledky chirurgické a konzervativní léčby pacientů s ramenním impingement syndromem - prospektivní srovnávací klinická studie
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Subacromial impingement is one of the most common reasons for shoulder pain. The surgical management of this condition has recently become the focus of criticism because of the rising number of surgical procedures and the lack of superiority of surgical over conservative treatment. In this prospective comparative study, we compared standardised conservative care with surgical treatment and placed special emphasis on the patients' ability to work. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 106 patients (25 women, 81 men; mean age: 45.4 12.3 years) were included in this prospective comparative clinical study. Patients in the non-operative arm (n = 42) received standardised physiotherapy. Patients in the surgical arm (n = 38) underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression. All patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months. Shoulder function (Constant score), pain (Numerical Rating Scale), and the duration of inability to work were assessed. RESULTS Shoulder function and pain improved significantly with both kinds of treatment. At no time of follow up we detected significant differences between the two treatment options. An analysis of the patients' ability to work showed that conservative treatment was superior to surgical treatment at 3-month follow-up (0.3 versus 5.0 weeks; p < 0.001) and between 4 and 6-month after intervention (0.2 versus 1.6 weeks; p = 0.032). DISCUSSION In the study presented here, significant improvements in function (Constant score) and pain (NRS) were achieved in both the non-operative and the surgical arm. There were no significant differences between the two groups at any time point. These results are similar to those reported by other authors in recent studies. Unlike other research work, however, our study demonstrated a major difference in the development and duration of inability to work. CONCLUSIONS Conservative and surgical treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome led to similar outcomes for shoulder pain and function at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention. However, patients who were managed conservatively returned to work significantly earlier than patients who underwent surgery. Key words: subacromial impingement, shoulder, constant score, pain, ability to work.
650    _2
$a artroskopie $7 D001182
650    _2
$a konzervativní terapie $7 D000072700
650    _2
$a chirurgická dekomprese $7 D019299
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a syndrom zhmožděného ramene $x chirurgie $7 D019534
650    _2
$a bolest ramene $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D020069
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tischer, T. $u Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
700    1_
$a Hacke, C. $u Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Gutcke, A. $u Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Armed Forces Hospital of Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany
700    1_
$a Schulze, C. $u Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany; Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Armed Forces Hospital of Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 87, č. 5 (2020), s. 340-345
856    41
$u https://achot.cz/pdfs/ach/2020/05/06.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20201110 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210210104216 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1619866 $s 1107986
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 87 $c 5 $d 340-345 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20201110

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...