• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China

X. Long, H. Yu, M. Sun, XC. Wang, JJ. Klemeš, W. Xie, C. Wang, W. Li, Y. Wang,

. 2020 ; 265 (-) : 110509. [pub] 20200413

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20022992

Sustainable development emphasizes the sustainability of natural resources and the environment as well as the development of social welfare. Under the background of resource scarcity and environmental constraints, maximizing social welfare is an inevitable choice to achieve sustainable development. Ecological Wellbeing Performance (EWP) can comprehensively reflect the efficiency of natural capital conversion into social welfare, and improving EWP is a feasible measure to achieve sustainable development. Moreover, island areas are the extremely complicated ecological-social-economic systems due to the traits that are geographical isolation, scarce resources, and frequent natural disasters, so that emphasizing the sustainability of island systems is a key step for achieving sustainable development goals. This study developed the EWP model based on the improved Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint (EF) and urban-scale Human Development Index (HDI), to synthetically evaluate and analyze the sustainable development of four major island regions in China with the data in 2017. Results found that: (1) The four regions are all in ecological deficits, being in exchange for overdraft natural capital for economic development. The EFdepth is greater than the original length 1 indicating the excessive consumption of the natural capital stock. The EFsize reflects the abundance and liquidity of regional natural capital, all the four regions are with the generally low level of flow capital utilization. Hainan with highest EFsize 0.428 is due to its comparatively sparse population density, abundant resources, and strong ecological capacity, while the relatively large population density and more restricted natural capital flows make Taiwan in the lowest value. (2) Judging from the evaluation results of the HDI, Chongming (0.796) and Hainan (0.773) high development level are relatively behind Taiwan (0.912) and Zhoushan (0.827) very high development level, for the impact of income is greater, that is, economic development in Hainan and Chongming is slightly weak. (3) Taiwan, with the highest EWP 3.646, shows the excellent natural resource utilization efficiency and sustainability, followed by Zhoushan, Chongming, and Hainan. In general, increasing HDI while reducing EF can be an ideal way to improve the efficiency of ecological resources and achieve sustainable urban development.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20022992
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214125101.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110509 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32421554
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Long, Xinyi $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
245    10
$a Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China / $c X. Long, H. Yu, M. Sun, XC. Wang, JJ. Klemeš, W. Xie, C. Wang, W. Li, Y. Wang,
520    9_
$a Sustainable development emphasizes the sustainability of natural resources and the environment as well as the development of social welfare. Under the background of resource scarcity and environmental constraints, maximizing social welfare is an inevitable choice to achieve sustainable development. Ecological Wellbeing Performance (EWP) can comprehensively reflect the efficiency of natural capital conversion into social welfare, and improving EWP is a feasible measure to achieve sustainable development. Moreover, island areas are the extremely complicated ecological-social-economic systems due to the traits that are geographical isolation, scarce resources, and frequent natural disasters, so that emphasizing the sustainability of island systems is a key step for achieving sustainable development goals. This study developed the EWP model based on the improved Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint (EF) and urban-scale Human Development Index (HDI), to synthetically evaluate and analyze the sustainable development of four major island regions in China with the data in 2017. Results found that: (1) The four regions are all in ecological deficits, being in exchange for overdraft natural capital for economic development. The EFdepth is greater than the original length 1 indicating the excessive consumption of the natural capital stock. The EFsize reflects the abundance and liquidity of regional natural capital, all the four regions are with the generally low level of flow capital utilization. Hainan with highest EFsize 0.428 is due to its comparatively sparse population density, abundant resources, and strong ecological capacity, while the relatively large population density and more restricted natural capital flows make Taiwan in the lowest value. (2) Judging from the evaluation results of the HDI, Chongming (0.796) and Hainan (0.773) high development level are relatively behind Taiwan (0.912) and Zhoushan (0.827) very high development level, for the impact of income is greater, that is, economic development in Hainan and Chongming is slightly weak. (3) Taiwan, with the highest EWP 3.646, shows the excellent natural resource utilization efficiency and sustainability, followed by Zhoushan, Chongming, and Hainan. In general, increasing HDI while reducing EF can be an ideal way to improve the efficiency of ecological resources and achieve sustainable urban development.
650    12
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    12
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ostrovy $7 D062312
651    _2
$a Čína $7 D002681
651    _2
$a Taiwan $7 D013624
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Yu, Huajun $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
700    1_
$a Sun, Mingxing $u Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
700    1_
$a Wang, Xue-Chao $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Xie, Wei $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
700    1_
$a Wang, Chengdong $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
700    1_
$a Li, Wenqing $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
700    1_
$a Wang, Yutao $u Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China; Institute of Eco-Chongming (IEC), No.3663 Northern Zhongshan Road, Shanghai, 20006, China. Electronic address: yutaowang@fudan.edu.cn.
773    0_
$w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 265, č. - (2020), s. 110509
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32421554 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214125101 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595311 $s 1113668
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 265 $c - $d 110509 $e 20200413 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...