-
Something wrong with this record ?
Late open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: experience of three-high volume centers
LB. Davidovic, D. Palombo, V. Treska, M. Sladojevic, IB. Koncar, K. Houdek, G. Spinella, P. Zlatanovic, B. Pane,
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
- MeSH
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal diagnostic imaging mortality surgery MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects methods MeSH
- Databases, Factual MeSH
- Endoleak surgery MeSH
- Endovascular Procedures adverse effects methods MeSH
- Conversion to Open Surgery methods mortality MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Hospital Mortality MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Cause of Death * MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Reoperation methods MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Hospitals, High-Volume MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Accumulated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures will increase number of patients requiring conversion to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). In most cases, patients undergo late open surgical conversion (LOSC), many months, or years, after initial EVAR. The aim of this study is to analyze results of LOSC after EVAR in elective and urgent setting, including presenting features, surgical techniques, as well as to review the clinical outcomes and their predictors. METHODS: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing LOSC after EVAR was performed at three distinct, high volume, vascular centers. Patients that required primary conversion within 30 days after EVAR have not been included in this study. Between January 1st 2010 and January 1st 2017 total of 31 consecutive patients were treated. LOSC were performed either in elective or in urgent setting, thus dividing patients in two groups. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary postoperative complications. RESULTS: LOSC rate after EVAR was 4.51%. Most common indication for LOSC was type I endoleak (N.=20, 64.51%). All patients that presented with ruptured AAA had some form of endoleak (type I endoleak was present in five from six cases). Most common site for aortic cross-clamping was infrarenal (51.61%). Stent-graft was removed completely in 18 patients (58.06%) and partially in 13 (41.93%). 30-day mortality rate was 16.12% (5 patients) and most common cause of death was myocardial infarction (60%). Following univariate factors were isolated as predictors for 30-day mortality: preoperative coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urgent LOSC, prolonged time until LOSC, ruptured AAA, supraceliac clamp, higher number of red blood cell transfusion, postoperative myocardial infarction, and prolonged intubation (more than 48 hours). CONCLUSIONS: LOSC seems to be safe and effective procedure when preformed in elective manner. On the other side, urgent LOSC after EVAR is associated with very high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Endoleak remains the main indication for open conversion. Further studies are necessary to standardize timing and treatment options for failing EVAR.
Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia
Department of Surgery University Hospital School of Medicine Pilsen Czech Republic
Department of Vascular Surgery University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023087
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214125243.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10972-X $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31755677
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Davidovic, Lazar B $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
- 245 10
- $a Late open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: experience of three-high volume centers / $c LB. Davidovic, D. Palombo, V. Treska, M. Sladojevic, IB. Koncar, K. Houdek, G. Spinella, P. Zlatanovic, B. Pane,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Accumulated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures will increase number of patients requiring conversion to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). In most cases, patients undergo late open surgical conversion (LOSC), many months, or years, after initial EVAR. The aim of this study is to analyze results of LOSC after EVAR in elective and urgent setting, including presenting features, surgical techniques, as well as to review the clinical outcomes and their predictors. METHODS: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing LOSC after EVAR was performed at three distinct, high volume, vascular centers. Patients that required primary conversion within 30 days after EVAR have not been included in this study. Between January 1st 2010 and January 1st 2017 total of 31 consecutive patients were treated. LOSC were performed either in elective or in urgent setting, thus dividing patients in two groups. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary postoperative complications. RESULTS: LOSC rate after EVAR was 4.51%. Most common indication for LOSC was type I endoleak (N.=20, 64.51%). All patients that presented with ruptured AAA had some form of endoleak (type I endoleak was present in five from six cases). Most common site for aortic cross-clamping was infrarenal (51.61%). Stent-graft was removed completely in 18 patients (58.06%) and partially in 13 (41.93%). 30-day mortality rate was 16.12% (5 patients) and most common cause of death was myocardial infarction (60%). Following univariate factors were isolated as predictors for 30-day mortality: preoperative coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urgent LOSC, prolonged time until LOSC, ruptured AAA, supraceliac clamp, higher number of red blood cell transfusion, postoperative myocardial infarction, and prolonged intubation (more than 48 hours). CONCLUSIONS: LOSC seems to be safe and effective procedure when preformed in elective manner. On the other side, urgent LOSC after EVAR is associated with very high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Endoleak remains the main indication for open conversion. Further studies are necessary to standardize timing and treatment options for failing EVAR.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a aneurysma břišní aorty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D017544
- 650 _2
- $a cévy - implantace protéz $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019917
- 650 12
- $a příčina smrti $7 D002423
- 650 _2
- $a konverze na otevřenou operaci $x metody $x mortalita $7 D061887
- 650 _2
- $a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
- 650 _2
- $a endoleak $x chirurgie $7 D057867
- 650 _2
- $a endovaskulární výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D057510
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mortalita v nemocnicích $7 D017052
- 650 _2
- $a specializovaná centra se zvyšujícím se počtem výkonů a tím zvyšující se kvalitou léčby $7 D061847
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $x metody $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Palombo, Domenico $u Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, San Martino University Hospital IRCCS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Treska, Vladislav $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sladojevic, Milos $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia - sladojevic@gmail.com. Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
- 700 1_
- $a Koncar, Igor B $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
- 700 1_
- $a Houdek, Karel $u Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Spinella, Giovanni $u Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, San Martino University Hospital IRCCS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Zlatanovic, Petar $u Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
- 700 1_
- $a Pane, Bianca $u Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, San Martino University Hospital IRCCS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002572 $t The Journal of cardiovascular surgery $x 1827-191X $g Roč. 61, č. 2 (2020), s. 183-190
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755677 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214125242 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595406 $s 1113763
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 61 $c 2 $d 183-190 $e 20191118 $i 1827-191X $m Journal of cardiovascular surgery $n J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) $x MED00002572
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125