-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Composting versus mechanical-biological treatment: Does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity
MD. Vaverková, J. Elbl, S. Voběrková, E. Koda, D. Adamcová, Z. Mariusz Gusiatin, A. Al Rahman, M. Radziemska, Z. Mazur,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- biomasa MeSH
- kompostování * MeSH
- nakládání s odpady * MeSH
- půda MeSH
- tuhý odpad MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
One of crucial waste management problems is the management of organic waste. This activity employs the composting. In case of green waste, its application seems reasonable, whereas the use of selected mixed waste raises problems related to the compost quality. Across countries, the non-sterile organic fraction of municipal solid waste is being separated through the mechanical-biological treatment. The technology is a solution of waste treatment and meets objectives set out in the Landfill Directive. There are many problems associated with the use of output products. The use of compost as a fertilizer requires determination of its impact on the environment. Compost quality can be assessed using analytical methods and phytotoxicity tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe changes in physico-chemical, enzymatic, phytotoxicity and vegetation parameters occurring in composts from two systems - a prismatic installation for green waste, and a mechanical-biological treatment installation. The compost from green waste exhibited greater stability. Values of dehydrogenase activity were lower if compared with the mechanically and biologically treated compost, which indicates lower compost maturity. The biomass production of Brassica napus L. and Fetuca rubra L. was higher in the variant with the application of green compost. The influence on Hordeum vulgare L., Cannabis sativa L., and Sinapis alba L. depended on the plant type and the compost used. Nevertheless, the compost from green waste was less toxic. The evidence from this study suggests that the mechanical-biological treatment had problems associated with the maturation and quality of the final product.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023095
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214125249.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.030 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32222681
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vaverková, Magdalena Daria $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 776 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: magda.vaverkova@uake.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Composting versus mechanical-biological treatment: Does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity / $c MD. Vaverková, J. Elbl, S. Voběrková, E. Koda, D. Adamcová, Z. Mariusz Gusiatin, A. Al Rahman, M. Radziemska, Z. Mazur,
- 520 9_
- $a One of crucial waste management problems is the management of organic waste. This activity employs the composting. In case of green waste, its application seems reasonable, whereas the use of selected mixed waste raises problems related to the compost quality. Across countries, the non-sterile organic fraction of municipal solid waste is being separated through the mechanical-biological treatment. The technology is a solution of waste treatment and meets objectives set out in the Landfill Directive. There are many problems associated with the use of output products. The use of compost as a fertilizer requires determination of its impact on the environment. Compost quality can be assessed using analytical methods and phytotoxicity tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe changes in physico-chemical, enzymatic, phytotoxicity and vegetation parameters occurring in composts from two systems - a prismatic installation for green waste, and a mechanical-biological treatment installation. The compost from green waste exhibited greater stability. Values of dehydrogenase activity were lower if compared with the mechanically and biologically treated compost, which indicates lower compost maturity. The biomass production of Brassica napus L. and Fetuca rubra L. was higher in the variant with the application of green compost. The influence on Hordeum vulgare L., Cannabis sativa L., and Sinapis alba L. depended on the plant type and the compost used. Nevertheless, the compost from green waste was less toxic. The evidence from this study suggests that the mechanical-biological treatment had problems associated with the maturation and quality of the final product.
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 12
- $a kompostování $7 D000076282
- 650 _2
- $a půda $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a tuhý odpad $7 D062611
- 650 12
- $a nakládání s odpady $7 D018505
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Elbl, Jakub $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno, University of Technology, Purkynova 656/123, Brno CZ-616 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Voběrková, Stanislava $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelská 1, CZ-61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Koda, Eugeniusz $u Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 776 Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Adamcová, Dana $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mariusz Gusiatin, Zygmunt $u Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna St. 45G, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Al Rahman, Abd $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelská 1, CZ-61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Radziemska, Maja $u Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 776 Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Mazur, Zbigniew $u Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna St. 45G, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006459 $t Waste management (New York, N.Y.) $x 1879-2456 $g Roč. 106, č. - (2020), s. 173-183
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32222681 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214125249 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595414 $s 1113771
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 106 $c - $d 173-183 $e 20200326 $i 1879-2456 $m Waste management $n Waste Manag $x MED00006459
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125
