-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Differential effects of habitat loss on occupancy patterns of the eastern green lizard Lacerta viridis at the core and periphery of its distribution range
AM. Prieto-Ramirez, L. Röhler, AF. Cord, G. Pe'er, D. Rödder, K. Henle,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Free Medical Journals od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS) od 2006
PubMed Central od 2006
Europe PubMed Central od 2006
ProQuest Central od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources od 2006
Odkazy
PubMed
32134932
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0229600
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ekologie metody MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- ještěři růst a vývoj MeSH
- pravděpodobnost MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Bulharsko MeSH
- Česká republika MeSH
The effects of habitat loss on the distribution of populations are often linked with species specialization degree. Specialist species can be more affected by changes in landscape structure and local patch characteristics compared to generalist species. Moreover, the spatial scale at which different land covers (eg. habitat, cropland, urban areas) affect specialist species can be smaller. Specialization is usually assumed as a constant trait along the distribution range of species. However, for several taxa, there is evidence of higher specialization degree in peripheral populations compared with populations in the core. Hence, peripheral populations should have a higher sensitivity to habitat loss, and strongest effects should be found at a smaller spatial scale. To test these expectations, we implemented a patch-landscape approach at different spatial scales, and compared effects of landscape structure and patch characteristics on occupancy probability among northern peripheral, more specialized populations (Czech Republic) and core populations (Bulgaria) of the eastern green lizard Lacerta viridis. We found that landscape structure and patch characteristics affect differently the occupancy probability of Lacerta viridis in each region. Strongest effects of habitat loss were found at a spatial scale of 150m around patches in the periphery, but at a scale of 500m in the core. In the periphery occupancy probability of populations was principally affected by landscape composition, and the effect of habitat quality was stronger compared to core populations. In the core, persistence of populations was mainly explained by characteristics of the spatial configuration of habitat patches. We discuss possible ecological mechanisms behind the relationship between sensitivity to habitat loss, populations' specialization degree and position in the distribution range, and suggest conservation measures for L. viridis.
Department of Conservation Biology Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig Germany
Department of Herpetology Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig ZFMK Bonn Germany
Department of Landscape Ecology Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig Germany
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023112
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214125312.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0229600 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32134932
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Prieto-Ramirez, Ana María $u Department of Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Differential effects of habitat loss on occupancy patterns of the eastern green lizard Lacerta viridis at the core and periphery of its distribution range / $c AM. Prieto-Ramirez, L. Röhler, AF. Cord, G. Pe'er, D. Rödder, K. Henle,
- 520 9_
- $a The effects of habitat loss on the distribution of populations are often linked with species specialization degree. Specialist species can be more affected by changes in landscape structure and local patch characteristics compared to generalist species. Moreover, the spatial scale at which different land covers (eg. habitat, cropland, urban areas) affect specialist species can be smaller. Specialization is usually assumed as a constant trait along the distribution range of species. However, for several taxa, there is evidence of higher specialization degree in peripheral populations compared with populations in the core. Hence, peripheral populations should have a higher sensitivity to habitat loss, and strongest effects should be found at a smaller spatial scale. To test these expectations, we implemented a patch-landscape approach at different spatial scales, and compared effects of landscape structure and patch characteristics on occupancy probability among northern peripheral, more specialized populations (Czech Republic) and core populations (Bulgaria) of the eastern green lizard Lacerta viridis. We found that landscape structure and patch characteristics affect differently the occupancy probability of Lacerta viridis in each region. Strongest effects of habitat loss were found at a spatial scale of 150m around patches in the periphery, but at a scale of 500m in the core. In the periphery occupancy probability of populations was principally affected by landscape composition, and the effect of habitat quality was stronger compared to core populations. In the core, persistence of populations was mainly explained by characteristics of the spatial configuration of habitat patches. We discuss possible ecological mechanisms behind the relationship between sensitivity to habitat loss, populations' specialization degree and position in the distribution range, and suggest conservation measures for L. viridis.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ekologie $x metody $7 D004463
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a ještěři $x růst a vývoj $7 D008116
- 650 _2
- $a pravděpodobnost $7 D011336
- 651 _2
- $a Bulharsko $7 D002031
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Röhler, Leonie $u Department of Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Cord, Anna F $u Department of Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Pe'er, Guy $u German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Jena-Halle-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Department of Economics and Department Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany. University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Rödder, Dennis $u Department of Herpetology, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig ZFMK, Bonn, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Henle, Klaus $u Department of Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 3 (2020), s. e0229600
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32134932 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214125311 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595431 $s 1113788
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 15 $c 3 $d e0229600 $e 20200305 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125