Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Genetic diversity of a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania

V. Bartáková, B. Nagy, M. Polačik, R. Blažek, H. Lamtane, M. Reichard,

. 2020 ; 20 (1) : 1. [pub] 20200106

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: African annual killifishes (Nothobranchius spp.) are adapted to seasonally desiccating habitats (ephemeral pools), surviving dry periods as dormant eggs. Given their peculiar life history, geographic aspects of their diversity uniquely combine patterns typical for freshwater taxa (river basin structure and elevation gradient) and terrestrial animals (rivers acting as major dispersal barriers). However, our current knowledge on fine-scale inter-specific and intra-specific genetic diversity of African annual fish is limited to a single, particularly dry region of their distribution (subtropical Mozambique). Using a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania and Kenya, we tested whether the same pattern of genetic divergence pertains to a wet equatorial region in the centre of Nothobranchius distribution. RESULTS: In populations of Nothobranchius melanospilus species group across its range, we genotyped a part of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene (83 individuals from 22 populations) and 10 nuclear microsatellite markers (251 individuals from 16 populations). We found five lineages with a clear phylogeographic structure but frequent secondary contact. Mitochondrial lineages were largely congruent with main population genetic clusters identified on microsatellite markers. In the upper Wami basin, populations are isolated as a putative Nothobranchius prognathus, but include also a population from a periphery of the middle Ruvu basin. Other four lineages (including putative Nothobranchius kwalensis) coexisted in secondary contact zones, but possessed clear spatial pattern. Main river channels did not form apparent barriers to dispersal. The most widespread lineage had strong signal of recent population expansion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that dispersal of a Nothobranchius species from a wet part of the genus distribution (tropical lowland) is not constrained by main river channels and closely related lineages frequently coexist in secondary contact zones. We also demonstrate contemporary connection between the Ruvu and Rufiji river basins. Our data do not provide genetic support for existence of recently described cryptic species from N. melanospilus complex, but cannot resolve this issue.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023241
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214125549.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12862-019-1549-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31906845
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Bartáková, Veronika $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, 603 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Genetic diversity of a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania / $c V. Bartáková, B. Nagy, M. Polačik, R. Blažek, H. Lamtane, M. Reichard,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: African annual killifishes (Nothobranchius spp.) are adapted to seasonally desiccating habitats (ephemeral pools), surviving dry periods as dormant eggs. Given their peculiar life history, geographic aspects of their diversity uniquely combine patterns typical for freshwater taxa (river basin structure and elevation gradient) and terrestrial animals (rivers acting as major dispersal barriers). However, our current knowledge on fine-scale inter-specific and intra-specific genetic diversity of African annual fish is limited to a single, particularly dry region of their distribution (subtropical Mozambique). Using a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania and Kenya, we tested whether the same pattern of genetic divergence pertains to a wet equatorial region in the centre of Nothobranchius distribution. RESULTS: In populations of Nothobranchius melanospilus species group across its range, we genotyped a part of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene (83 individuals from 22 populations) and 10 nuclear microsatellite markers (251 individuals from 16 populations). We found five lineages with a clear phylogeographic structure but frequent secondary contact. Mitochondrial lineages were largely congruent with main population genetic clusters identified on microsatellite markers. In the upper Wami basin, populations are isolated as a putative Nothobranchius prognathus, but include also a population from a periphery of the middle Ruvu basin. Other four lineages (including putative Nothobranchius kwalensis) coexisted in secondary contact zones, but possessed clear spatial pattern. Main river channels did not form apparent barriers to dispersal. The most widespread lineage had strong signal of recent population expansion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that dispersal of a Nothobranchius species from a wet part of the genus distribution (tropical lowland) is not constrained by main river channels and closely related lineages frequently coexist in secondary contact zones. We also demonstrate contemporary connection between the Ruvu and Rufiji river basins. Our data do not provide genetic support for existence of recently described cryptic species from N. melanospilus complex, but cannot resolve this issue.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a mitochondriální DNA $x genetika $7 D004272
650    12
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a respirační komplex IV $x genetika $7 D003576
650    _2
$a sladká voda $7 D005618
650    _2
$a genetický drift $7 D040961
650    12
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    _2
$a populační genetika $7 D005828
650    _2
$a Cyprinodontidae $x genetika $7 D007695
650    _2
$a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a fylogeografie $7 D058974
650    _2
$a řeky $7 D045483
651    _2
$a Tanzanie $7 D013636
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Nagy, Béla $u , Fontainebleau, France.
700    1_
$a Polačik, Matej $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, 603 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Blažek, Radim $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, 603 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lamtane, Hieromin $u Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3004, Morogoro, Tanzania.
700    1_
$a Reichard, Martin $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, 603 65, Brno, Czech Republic. reichard@ivb.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00006797 $t BMC evolutionary biology $x 1471-2148 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2020), s. 1
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31906845 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214125548 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595560 $s 1113917
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 20 $c 1 $d 1 $e 20200106 $i 1471-2148 $m BMC evolutionary biology $n BMC Evol Biol $x MED00006797
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...