• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effect of Recanalization on Cerebral Edema in Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolysis and/or Endovascular Therapy

M. Thorén, A. Dixit, I. Escudero-Martínez, Z. Gdovinová, L. Klecka, VM. Rand, D. Toni, A. Vilionskis, N. Wahlgren, N. Ahmed,

. 2020 ; 51 (1) : 216-223. [pub] 20191210

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023299

Background and Purpose- A large infarct and expanding cerebral edema (CED) due to a middle cerebral artery occlusion confers a 70% mortality unless treated surgically. Reperfusion may cause blood-brain barrier disruption and a risk for cerebral edema and secondary parenchymal hemorrhage (PH). We aimed to investigate the effect of recanalization on development of early CED and PH after recanalization therapy. Methods- From the SITS-International Stroke Treatment Registry, we selected patients with signs of artery occlusion at baseline (either Hyperdense Artery Sign or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiographic occlusion). We defined recanalization as the disappearance of radiological signs of occlusion at 22 to 36 hours. Primary outcome was moderate to severe CED and secondary outcome was PH on 22- to 36-hour imaging scans. We used logistic regression with adjustment for baseline variables and PH. Results- Twenty two thousand one hundred eighty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (n=18 318 received intravenous thrombolysis, n=3071 received intravenous thrombolysis+thrombectomy, n=795 received thrombectomy). Recanalization occurred in 64.1%. Median age was 71 versus 71 years and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 versus 16 in the recanalized versus nonrecanalized patients respectively. Recanalized patients had a lower risk for CED (13.0% versus 23.6%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.52 (95% CI, 0.46-0.59), and a higher risk for PH (8.9% versus 6.5%), adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.22-1.55), than nonrecanalized patients. Conclusions- In patients with acute ischemic stroke, recanalization was associated with a lower risk for early CED even after adjustment for higher rate for PH in recanalized patients.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023299
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214125708.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026692 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31818228
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Thorén, Magnus $u From the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden (M.T., N.A.).
245    10
$a Effect of Recanalization on Cerebral Edema in Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolysis and/or Endovascular Therapy / $c M. Thorén, A. Dixit, I. Escudero-Martínez, Z. Gdovinová, L. Klecka, VM. Rand, D. Toni, A. Vilionskis, N. Wahlgren, N. Ahmed,
520    9_
$a Background and Purpose- A large infarct and expanding cerebral edema (CED) due to a middle cerebral artery occlusion confers a 70% mortality unless treated surgically. Reperfusion may cause blood-brain barrier disruption and a risk for cerebral edema and secondary parenchymal hemorrhage (PH). We aimed to investigate the effect of recanalization on development of early CED and PH after recanalization therapy. Methods- From the SITS-International Stroke Treatment Registry, we selected patients with signs of artery occlusion at baseline (either Hyperdense Artery Sign or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiographic occlusion). We defined recanalization as the disappearance of radiological signs of occlusion at 22 to 36 hours. Primary outcome was moderate to severe CED and secondary outcome was PH on 22- to 36-hour imaging scans. We used logistic regression with adjustment for baseline variables and PH. Results- Twenty two thousand one hundred eighty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (n=18 318 received intravenous thrombolysis, n=3071 received intravenous thrombolysis+thrombectomy, n=795 received thrombectomy). Recanalization occurred in 64.1%. Median age was 71 versus 71 years and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 versus 16 in the recanalized versus nonrecanalized patients respectively. Recanalized patients had a lower risk for CED (13.0% versus 23.6%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.52 (95% CI, 0.46-0.59), and a higher risk for PH (8.9% versus 6.5%), adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.22-1.55), than nonrecanalized patients. Conclusions- In patients with acute ischemic stroke, recanalization was associated with a lower risk for early CED even after adjustment for higher rate for PH in recanalized patients.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a edém mozku $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D001929
650    12
$a ischemie mozku $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D002545
650    _2
$a endovaskulární výkony $x škodlivé účinky $7 D057510
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mechanická trombolýza $x škodlivé účinky $7 D061185
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    12
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    12
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D020521
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dixit, Anand $u Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (A.D.).
700    1_
$a Escudero-Martínez, Irene $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla and Biomedicine Institute of Sevilla, Spain (I.E.-M.).
700    1_
$a Gdovinová, Zuzana $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, P.J. Safarik University Košice, Slovak republic (Z.G.).
700    1_
$a Klecka, Lukas $u Departement of Neurology, Municipal hospital of Ostrava, Czech Republic (L.K.).
700    1_
$a Rand, Viiu-Marika $u Department of Neurology, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn (V.-M.R.).
700    1_
$a Toni, Danilo $u Unità di Trattamento Neurovascolare, University La Sapienza Rome, Italy (D.T.).
700    1_
$a Vilionskis, Aleksandras $u Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Republican Vilnius University hospital, Lithuania (A.V.).
700    1_
$a Wahlgren, Nils $u Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden (N.W.).
700    1_
$a Ahmed, Niaz $u From the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden (M.T., N.A.).
773    0_
$w MED00010659 $t Stroke $x 1524-4628 $g Roč. 51, č. 1 (2020), s. 216-223
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31818228 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214125707 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595618 $s 1113975
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 51 $c 1 $d 216-223 $e 20191210 $i 1524-4628 $m Stroke $n Stroke $x MED00010659
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace