Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence

J. Fritz, J. Stochl, EI. Fried, IM. Goodyer, CD. van Borkulo, PO. Wilkinson, AL. van Harmelen,

. 2019 ; 17 (1) : 203. [pub] 20191114

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023485

Grantová podpora
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Childhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and their changes between early (age 14) and later adolescence (age 17). METHODS: We studied 10 empirically supported RFs in adolescents with (CA+; n = 631) and without CA (CA-; n = 499), using network psychometrics. RESULTS: All inter-personal RFs (e.g. friendships) showed stable mean levels between age 14 and 17, and three of seven intra-personal RFs (e.g. distress tolerance) changed in a similar manner in the two groups. The CA+ group had lower RFs and higher distress at both ages. Thus, CA does not seem to inhibit RF changes, but to increase the risk of persistently lower RFs. At age 14, but not 17, the RF network of the CA+ group was less positively connected, suggesting that RFs are less likely to enhance each other than in the CA- group. Those findings underpin the notion that CA has a predominantly strong proximal effect. RF-distress pathways did not differ in strength between the CA+ and the CA- group, which suggests that RFs have a similarly protective strength in the two groups. Yet, as RFs are lower and distress is higher, RF-distress pathways may overall be less advantageous in the CA+ group. Most RF interrelations and RF-distress pathways were stable between age 14 and 17, which may help explain why exposure to CA is frequently found to have a lasting impact on mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings not only shed light on the nature and changes of RFs between early and later adolescence, but also offer some accounts for why exposure to CA has stronger proximal effects and is often found to have a lasting impact on mental health.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023485
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214130149.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12916-019-1430-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31722707
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Fritz, J $u Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jf585@cam.ac.uk.
245    10
$a Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence / $c J. Fritz, J. Stochl, EI. Fried, IM. Goodyer, CD. van Borkulo, PO. Wilkinson, AL. van Harmelen,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Childhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and their changes between early (age 14) and later adolescence (age 17). METHODS: We studied 10 empirically supported RFs in adolescents with (CA+; n = 631) and without CA (CA-; n = 499), using network psychometrics. RESULTS: All inter-personal RFs (e.g. friendships) showed stable mean levels between age 14 and 17, and three of seven intra-personal RFs (e.g. distress tolerance) changed in a similar manner in the two groups. The CA+ group had lower RFs and higher distress at both ages. Thus, CA does not seem to inhibit RF changes, but to increase the risk of persistently lower RFs. At age 14, but not 17, the RF network of the CA+ group was less positively connected, suggesting that RFs are less likely to enhance each other than in the CA- group. Those findings underpin the notion that CA has a predominantly strong proximal effect. RF-distress pathways did not differ in strength between the CA+ and the CA- group, which suggests that RFs have a similarly protective strength in the two groups. Yet, as RFs are lower and distress is higher, RF-distress pathways may overall be less advantageous in the CA+ group. Most RF interrelations and RF-distress pathways were stable between age 14 and 17, which may help explain why exposure to CA is frequently found to have a lasting impact on mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings not only shed light on the nature and changes of RFs between early and later adolescence, but also offer some accounts for why exposure to CA has stronger proximal effects and is often found to have a lasting impact on mental health.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    12
$a vývoj mladistvých $7 D041923
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a psychická odolnost $7 D055500
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
650    _2
$a psychický stres $7 D013315
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Stochl, J $u Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Kinanthropology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fried, E I $u Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Goodyer, I M $u Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
700    1_
$a van Borkulo, C D $u Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Wilkinson, P O $u Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
700    1_
$a van Harmelen, A-L $u Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00008190 $t BMC medicine $x 1741-7015 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2019), s. 203
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31722707 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214130149 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595804 $s 1114161
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 17 $c 1 $d 203 $e 20191114 $i 1741-7015 $m BMC medicine $n BMC Med $x MED00008190
GRA    __
$p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace