• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Safety of Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in De Novo Kidney Transplants: An Analysis From the Randomized TRANSFORM Study

H. Tedesco-Silva, J. Pascual, O. Viklicky, N. Basic-Jukic, E. Cassuto, DY. Kim, JM. Cruzado, C. Sommerer, M. Adel Bakr, VD. Garcia, HD. Uyen, G. Russ, M. Soo Kim, D. Kuypers, M. Buchler, F. Citterio, MP. Hernandez Gutierrez, P. Bernhardt, S....

. 2019 ; 103 (9) : 1953-1963. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023727

BACKGROUND: The safety profiles of standard therapy versus everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy using contemporary protocols in de novo kidney transplant recipients have not been compared in detail. METHODS: TRANSFORM was a randomized, international trial in which de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized to everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (N = 1014) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (N = 1012), both with induction and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Within the safety population (everolimus 1014, MPA 1012), adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 62.9% versus 59.2% of patients given everolimus or MPA, respectively (P = 0.085). Hyperlipidemia, interstitial lung disease, peripheral edema, proteinuria, stomatitis/mouth ulceration, thrombocytopenia, and wound healing complications were more frequent with everolimus, whereas diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, tremor, and insomnia were more frequent in the MPA group. The incidence of viral infections (17.2% versus 29.2%; P < 0.001), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (8.1% versus 20.1%; P < 0.001), CMV syndrome (13.6% versus 23.0%, P = 0.044), and BK virus (BKV) infections (4.3% versus 8.0%, P < 0.001) were less frequent with everolimus. CMV infection was less common with everolimus versus MPA after adjusting for prophylaxis therapy in the D+/R- subgroup (P < 0.001). Study drug was discontinued more frequently due to rejection or impaired healing with everolimus, and more often due to BKV infection or BKV nephropathy with MPA. CONCLUSIONS: De novo everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI yielded a comparable incidence, though a distinctly different pattern, of adverse events versus current standard of care. Both regimens are safe and effective, yet their distinct profiles may enable tailoring for individual kidney transplant recipients.

Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide Australia

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension Inselspital Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation CHRU de Tours Hôpital Bretonneau Tours France

Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Gasthuisberg University Hospital University of Leuven Leuven Belgium Department of Microbiology and Immunology University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Hôpital Pasteur Nice France

Department of Nephrology Arterial Hypertension Dialysis and Transplantation University Hospital Centre Zagreb School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

Department of Nephrology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Department of Nephrology Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain

Department of Nephrology Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Barcelona Spain

Department of Nephrology Transplant Centre Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Department of Renal Medicine Royal Prince Alfred Hospital University of Sydney Sydney Australia

Department of Renal Transplantation Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil

Department of Transplantation Surgery Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System Seoul Republic of Korea

Division of Nephrology Hospital do Rim Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery Henry Ford Hospital Detroit MI

Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center Mansoura Egypt

Policlinico Foundation A Gemelli University IRCCS Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome Italy

Research and Development Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023727
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214130955.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/TP.0000000000002626 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30801548
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tedesco-Silva, Helio $u Division of Nephrology, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
245    10
$a Safety of Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in De Novo Kidney Transplants: An Analysis From the Randomized TRANSFORM Study / $c H. Tedesco-Silva, J. Pascual, O. Viklicky, N. Basic-Jukic, E. Cassuto, DY. Kim, JM. Cruzado, C. Sommerer, M. Adel Bakr, VD. Garcia, HD. Uyen, G. Russ, M. Soo Kim, D. Kuypers, M. Buchler, F. Citterio, MP. Hernandez Gutierrez, P. Bernhardt, S. Chadban, TRANSFORM Investigators,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The safety profiles of standard therapy versus everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy using contemporary protocols in de novo kidney transplant recipients have not been compared in detail. METHODS: TRANSFORM was a randomized, international trial in which de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized to everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (N = 1014) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (N = 1012), both with induction and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Within the safety population (everolimus 1014, MPA 1012), adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 62.9% versus 59.2% of patients given everolimus or MPA, respectively (P = 0.085). Hyperlipidemia, interstitial lung disease, peripheral edema, proteinuria, stomatitis/mouth ulceration, thrombocytopenia, and wound healing complications were more frequent with everolimus, whereas diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, tremor, and insomnia were more frequent in the MPA group. The incidence of viral infections (17.2% versus 29.2%; P < 0.001), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (8.1% versus 20.1%; P < 0.001), CMV syndrome (13.6% versus 23.0%, P = 0.044), and BK virus (BKV) infections (4.3% versus 8.0%, P < 0.001) were less frequent with everolimus. CMV infection was less common with everolimus versus MPA after adjusting for prophylaxis therapy in the D+/R- subgroup (P < 0.001). Study drug was discontinued more frequently due to rejection or impaired healing with everolimus, and more often due to BKV infection or BKV nephropathy with MPA. CONCLUSIONS: De novo everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI yielded a comparable incidence, though a distinctly different pattern, of adverse events versus current standard of care. Both regimens are safe and effective, yet their distinct profiles may enable tailoring for individual kidney transplant recipients.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a inhibitory kalcineurinu $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D065095
650    _2
$a cyklosporin $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016572
650    _2
$a kombinovaná farmakoterapie $7 D004359
650    _2
$a everolimus $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000068338
650    _2
$a rejekce štěpu $x imunologie $x mortalita $x prevence a kontrola $7 D006084
650    _2
$a přežívání štěpu $x účinky léků $7 D006085
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunosupresiva $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007166
650    12
$a transplantace ledvin $x škodlivé účinky $x mortalita $7 D016030
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a kyselina mykofenolová $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D009173
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a takrolimus $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016559
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Pascual, Julio $u Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Viklicky, Ondrej $u Department of Nephrology, Transplant Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Basic-Jukic, Nikolina $u Department of Nephrology, Arterial Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
700    1_
$a Cassuto, Elisabeth $u Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France.
700    1_
$a Kim, Dean Y $u Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
700    1_
$a Cruzado, Josep M $u Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Sommerer, Claudia $u Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Adel Bakr, Mohamed $u Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt.
700    1_
$a Garcia, Valter D $u Department of Renal Transplantation, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Uyen, Huynh-Do $u Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Russ, Graeme $u Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
700    1_
$a Soo Kim, Myoung $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
700    1_
$a Kuypers, Dirk $u Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Buchler, Matthias $u Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, CHRU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France.
700    1_
$a Citterio, Franco $u Policlinico Foundation, A Gemelli University, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
700    1_
$a Hernandez Gutierrez, Maria Pilar $u Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Bernhardt, Peter $u Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Chadban, Steve $u Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
710    2_
$a TRANSFORM Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00010695 $t Transplantation $x 1534-6080 $g Roč. 103, č. 9 (2019), s. 1953-1963
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30801548 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214130953 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596046 $s 1114403
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 103 $c 9 $d 1953-1963 $e - $i 1534-6080 $m Transplantation $n Transplantation $x MED00010695
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...