-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Experimental and Computational Modeling of the Effects of Voice Therapy Using Tubes
J. Horáček, V. Radolf, AM. Laukkanen,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2010-02-01 do 2022-09-30
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 1997-02-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1997-02-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2010-02-01 do 2022-09-30
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2010-02-01 do 2022-09-30
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2010-02-01 do 2022-09-30
- MeSH
- akustika řeči MeSH
- anatomické modely MeSH
- fonace fyziologie MeSH
- glottis MeSH
- hlasový trénink MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- plíce fyziologie MeSH
- počítačová simulace MeSH
- řečová terapie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Purpose Phonations into a tube with the distal end either in the air or submerged in water are used for voice therapy. This study explores the effective mechanisms of these therapy methods. Method The study applied a physical model complemented by calculations from a computational model, and the results were compared to those that have been reported for humans. The effects of tube phonation on vocal tract resonances and oral pressure variation were studied. The relationships of transglottic pressure variation in time Ptrans ( t) versus glottal area variation in time GA( t) were constructed. Results The physical model revealed that, for the phonation on [u:] vowel through a glass resonance tube ending in the air, the 1st formant frequency ( F1 ) decreased by 67%, from 315 Hz to 105 Hz, thus slightly above the fundamental frequency ( F0 ) that was set to 90-94 Hz . For phonation through the tube into water, F1 decreased by 91%-92%, reaching 26-28 Hz, and the water bubbling frequency Fb ≅ 19-24 Hz was just below F1 . The relationships of Ptrans ( t) versus GA( t) clearly differentiate vowel phonation from both therapy methods, and show a physical background for voice therapy with tubes. It is shown that comparable results have been measured in humans during tube therapy. For the tube in air, F1 descends closer to F0 , whereas for the tube in water, the frequency Fb occurs close to the acoustic-mechanical resonance of the human vocal tract. Conclusion In both therapy methods, part of the airflow energy required for phonation is substituted by the acoustic energy utilizing the 1st acoustic resonance. Thus, less flow energy is needed for vocal fold vibration, which results in improved vocal efficiency. The effect can be stronger in water resistance therapy if the frequency Fb approaches the acoustic-mechanical resonance of the vocal tract, while simultaneously F0 is voluntarily changed close to F1.
Institute of Thermomechanics Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
Speech and Voice Research Laboratory Faculty of Education University of Tampere Finland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023825
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214131332.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-17-0490 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31251676
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Horáček, J $u Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Experimental and Computational Modeling of the Effects of Voice Therapy Using Tubes / $c J. Horáček, V. Radolf, AM. Laukkanen,
- 520 9_
- $a Purpose Phonations into a tube with the distal end either in the air or submerged in water are used for voice therapy. This study explores the effective mechanisms of these therapy methods. Method The study applied a physical model complemented by calculations from a computational model, and the results were compared to those that have been reported for humans. The effects of tube phonation on vocal tract resonances and oral pressure variation were studied. The relationships of transglottic pressure variation in time Ptrans ( t) versus glottal area variation in time GA( t) were constructed. Results The physical model revealed that, for the phonation on [u:] vowel through a glass resonance tube ending in the air, the 1st formant frequency ( F1 ) decreased by 67%, from 315 Hz to 105 Hz, thus slightly above the fundamental frequency ( F0 ) that was set to 90-94 Hz . For phonation through the tube into water, F1 decreased by 91%-92%, reaching 26-28 Hz, and the water bubbling frequency Fb ≅ 19-24 Hz was just below F1 . The relationships of Ptrans ( t) versus GA( t) clearly differentiate vowel phonation from both therapy methods, and show a physical background for voice therapy with tubes. It is shown that comparable results have been measured in humans during tube therapy. For the tube in air, F1 descends closer to F0 , whereas for the tube in water, the frequency Fb occurs close to the acoustic-mechanical resonance of the human vocal tract. Conclusion In both therapy methods, part of the airflow energy required for phonation is substituted by the acoustic energy utilizing the 1st acoustic resonance. Thus, less flow energy is needed for vocal fold vibration, which results in improved vocal efficiency. The effect can be stronger in water resistance therapy if the frequency Fb approaches the acoustic-mechanical resonance of the vocal tract, while simultaneously F0 is voluntarily changed close to F1.
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová simulace $7 D003198
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a glottis $7 D005931
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a plíce $x fyziologie $7 D008168
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a anatomické modely $7 D008953
- 650 _2
- $a fonace $x fyziologie $7 D010699
- 650 _2
- $a akustika řeči $7 D013061
- 650 _2
- $a řečová terapie $x metody $7 D013070
- 650 _2
- $a hlasový trénink $7 D014834
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Radolf, V $u Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Laukkanen, A-M $u Speech and Voice Research Laboratory, Faculty of Education, University of Tampere, Finland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005429 $t Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR $x 1558-9102 $g Roč. 62, č. 7 (2019), s. 2227-2244
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31251676 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214131331 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1596144 $s 1114501
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 62 $c 7 $d 2227-2244 $e 20190627 $i 1558-9102 $m Journal of speech, language, and hearing research $n J Speech Lang Hear Res $x MED00005429
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125