-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers
M. Králík, L. Polcerová, M. Čuta,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1999-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1974
- MeSH
- dermatoglyfika * MeSH
- fenotyp * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pohlavní dimorfismus MeSH
- prsty ruky anatomie a histologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty.Aim: To compare sex differences in whorl frequencies between fingers.Subjects and methods: Using meta-analytical methods, the authors studied sex differences in frequencies of whorls (log Odd Ratios) for each finger separately, including their heterogeneities (between-samples variance). The dataset of 204 population samples was extracted from published dermatoglyphic studies.Results: Aggregated effects of sex differences were significant in all fingers, except for the left 1st finger. Sex differences were higher in the right hand and increased from radial to ulnar fingers. Apart from the right 1st and 3rd fingers, heterogeneities were small and literally zero in the right 4th finger.Conclusion: Higher sex differences in ulnar fingers and the lack of interpopulation differences all over the world in the 4th finger might be caused by a stronger influence of genetic and/or hormonal factors on dermatoglyphic development of the ulnar side of the hand. It is suggested that future studies, when applying dermatoglyphic traits as markers of prenatal environment, use traits by individual fingers or their relationships within the hand.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023956
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214131859.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31122075
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Králík, Miroslav $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers / $c M. Králík, L. Polcerová, M. Čuta,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty.Aim: To compare sex differences in whorl frequencies between fingers.Subjects and methods: Using meta-analytical methods, the authors studied sex differences in frequencies of whorls (log Odd Ratios) for each finger separately, including their heterogeneities (between-samples variance). The dataset of 204 population samples was extracted from published dermatoglyphic studies.Results: Aggregated effects of sex differences were significant in all fingers, except for the left 1st finger. Sex differences were higher in the right hand and increased from radial to ulnar fingers. Apart from the right 1st and 3rd fingers, heterogeneities were small and literally zero in the right 4th finger.Conclusion: Higher sex differences in ulnar fingers and the lack of interpopulation differences all over the world in the 4th finger might be caused by a stronger influence of genetic and/or hormonal factors on dermatoglyphic development of the ulnar side of the hand. It is suggested that future studies, when applying dermatoglyphic traits as markers of prenatal environment, use traits by individual fingers or their relationships within the hand.
- 650 12
- $a dermatoglyfika $7 D003878
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a prsty ruky $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005385
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Polcerová, Lenka $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Čuta, Martin $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006173 $t Annals of human biology $x 1464-5033 $g Roč. 46, č. 3 (2019), s. 231-245
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31122075 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214131859 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1596275 $s 1114632
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 46 $c 3 $d 231-245 $e 20190626 $i 1464-5033 $m Annals of human biology $n Ann Hum Biol $x MED00006173
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125