Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers

M. Králík, L. Polcerová, M. Čuta,

. 2019 ; 46 (3) : 231-245. [pub] 20190626

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023956

Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty.Aim: To compare sex differences in whorl frequencies between fingers.Subjects and methods: Using meta-analytical methods, the authors studied sex differences in frequencies of whorls (log Odd Ratios) for each finger separately, including their heterogeneities (between-samples variance). The dataset of 204 population samples was extracted from published dermatoglyphic studies.Results: Aggregated effects of sex differences were significant in all fingers, except for the left 1st finger. Sex differences were higher in the right hand and increased from radial to ulnar fingers. Apart from the right 1st and 3rd fingers, heterogeneities were small and literally zero in the right 4th finger.Conclusion: Higher sex differences in ulnar fingers and the lack of interpopulation differences all over the world in the 4th finger might be caused by a stronger influence of genetic and/or hormonal factors on dermatoglyphic development of the ulnar side of the hand. It is suggested that future studies, when applying dermatoglyphic traits as markers of prenatal environment, use traits by individual fingers or their relationships within the hand.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023956
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214131859.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31122075
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Králík, Miroslav $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers / $c M. Králík, L. Polcerová, M. Čuta,
520    9_
$a Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty.Aim: To compare sex differences in whorl frequencies between fingers.Subjects and methods: Using meta-analytical methods, the authors studied sex differences in frequencies of whorls (log Odd Ratios) for each finger separately, including their heterogeneities (between-samples variance). The dataset of 204 population samples was extracted from published dermatoglyphic studies.Results: Aggregated effects of sex differences were significant in all fingers, except for the left 1st finger. Sex differences were higher in the right hand and increased from radial to ulnar fingers. Apart from the right 1st and 3rd fingers, heterogeneities were small and literally zero in the right 4th finger.Conclusion: Higher sex differences in ulnar fingers and the lack of interpopulation differences all over the world in the 4th finger might be caused by a stronger influence of genetic and/or hormonal factors on dermatoglyphic development of the ulnar side of the hand. It is suggested that future studies, when applying dermatoglyphic traits as markers of prenatal environment, use traits by individual fingers or their relationships within the hand.
650    12
$a dermatoglyfika $7 D003878
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a prsty ruky $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005385
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a fenotyp $7 D010641
650    _2
$a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Polcerová, Lenka $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Čuta, Martin $u Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00006173 $t Annals of human biology $x 1464-5033 $g Roč. 46, č. 3 (2019), s. 231-245
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31122075 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214131859 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596275 $s 1114632
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 46 $c 3 $d 231-245 $e 20190626 $i 1464-5033 $m Annals of human biology $n Ann Hum Biol $x MED00006173
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...