-
Something wrong with this record ?
Provision of Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak Psychotherapists
E. Humer, C. Pieh, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, R. Trnka, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, T. Probst,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
PubMed Central
from 2005
Europe PubMed Central
from 2005
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2004
- MeSH
- Betacoronavirus MeSH
- Coronavirus MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Coronavirus Infections psychology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pandemics MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Psychotherapy methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Fear MeSH
- Telemedicine statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Pneumonia, Viral psychology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Germany MeSH
- Slovakia MeSH
Psychotherapists around the world are facing an unprecedented situation with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To combat the rapid spread of the virus, direct contact with others has to be avoided when possible. Therefore, remote psychotherapy provides a valuable option to continue mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study investigated the fear of psychotherapists to become infected with COVID-19 during psychotherapy in personal contact and assessed how the provision of psychotherapy changed due to the COVID-19 situation and whether there were differences with regard to country and gender. Psychotherapists from three European countries: Czech Republic (CZ, n = 112), Germany (DE, n = 130) and Slovakia (SK, n = 96), with on average 77.8% female participants, completed an online survey. Participants rated the fear of COVID-19 infection during face-to-face psychotherapy and reported the number of patients treated on average per week (in personal contact, via telephone, via internet) during the COVID-19 situation as well as (retrospectively) in the months before. Fear of COVID-19 infection was highest in SK and lowest in DE (p < 0.001) and was higher in female compared to male psychotherapists (p = 0.021). In all countries, the number of patients treated on average per week in personal contact decreased (p < 0.001) and remote psychotherapies increased (p < 0.001), with more patients being treated via internet than via telephone during the COVID-19 situation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, female psychotherapists treated less patients in personal contact (p = 0.036), while they treated more patients via telephone than their male colleagues (p = 0.015). Overall, the total number of patients treated did not differ during COVID-19 from the months before (p = 0.133) and psychotherapy in personal contact remained the most common treatment modality. Results imply that the supply of mental health care could be maintained during COVID-19 and that changes in the provision of psychotherapy vary among countries and gender.
Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health Danube University Krems 3500 Krems Austria
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University Olomouc 77111 Olomouc Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20024903
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210329091255.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph17134811 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32635422
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Humer, Elke $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
- 245 10
- $a Provision of Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak Psychotherapists / $c E. Humer, C. Pieh, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, R. Trnka, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, T. Probst,
- 520 9_
- $a Psychotherapists around the world are facing an unprecedented situation with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To combat the rapid spread of the virus, direct contact with others has to be avoided when possible. Therefore, remote psychotherapy provides a valuable option to continue mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study investigated the fear of psychotherapists to become infected with COVID-19 during psychotherapy in personal contact and assessed how the provision of psychotherapy changed due to the COVID-19 situation and whether there were differences with regard to country and gender. Psychotherapists from three European countries: Czech Republic (CZ, n = 112), Germany (DE, n = 130) and Slovakia (SK, n = 96), with on average 77.8% female participants, completed an online survey. Participants rated the fear of COVID-19 infection during face-to-face psychotherapy and reported the number of patients treated on average per week (in personal contact, via telephone, via internet) during the COVID-19 situation as well as (retrospectively) in the months before. Fear of COVID-19 infection was highest in SK and lowest in DE (p < 0.001) and was higher in female compared to male psychotherapists (p = 0.021). In all countries, the number of patients treated on average per week in personal contact decreased (p < 0.001) and remote psychotherapies increased (p < 0.001), with more patients being treated via internet than via telephone during the COVID-19 situation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, female psychotherapists treated less patients in personal contact (p = 0.036), while they treated more patients via telephone than their male colleagues (p = 0.015). Overall, the total number of patients treated did not differ during COVID-19 from the months before (p = 0.133) and psychotherapy in personal contact remained the most common treatment modality. Results imply that the supply of mental health care could be maintained during COVID-19 and that changes in the provision of psychotherapy vary among countries and gender.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a Betacoronavirus $7 D000073640
- 650 _2
- $a Coronavirus $7 D017934
- 650 _2
- $a koronavirové infekce $x psychologie $7 D018352
- 650 _2
- $a strach $7 D005239
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pandemie $7 D058873
- 650 _2
- $a virová pneumonie $x psychologie $7 D011024
- 650 _2
- $a psychoterapie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011613
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a telemedicína $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017216
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Německo $7 D005858
- 651 _2
- $a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pieh, Christoph $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Kuska, Martin $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Barke, Antonia $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Doering, Bettina K $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Gossmann, Katharina $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Trnka, Radek $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, 14900 Prague, Czech Republic. Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Meier, Zdeněk $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic. $7 xx0258416
- 700 1_
- $a Kascakova, Natalia $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic. Psychiatric-Psychotherapeutic Outpatient Clinic, Pro mente sana, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Probst, Thomas $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 17, č. 13 (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32635422 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210329091206 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599048 $s 1115589
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 17 $c 13 $e 20200704 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125