Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Provision of Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak Psychotherapists

E. Humer, C. Pieh, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, R. Trnka, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, T. Probst,

. 2020 ; 17 (13) : . [pub] 20200704

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Psychotherapists around the world are facing an unprecedented situation with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To combat the rapid spread of the virus, direct contact with others has to be avoided when possible. Therefore, remote psychotherapy provides a valuable option to continue mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study investigated the fear of psychotherapists to become infected with COVID-19 during psychotherapy in personal contact and assessed how the provision of psychotherapy changed due to the COVID-19 situation and whether there were differences with regard to country and gender. Psychotherapists from three European countries: Czech Republic (CZ, n = 112), Germany (DE, n = 130) and Slovakia (SK, n = 96), with on average 77.8% female participants, completed an online survey. Participants rated the fear of COVID-19 infection during face-to-face psychotherapy and reported the number of patients treated on average per week (in personal contact, via telephone, via internet) during the COVID-19 situation as well as (retrospectively) in the months before. Fear of COVID-19 infection was highest in SK and lowest in DE (p < 0.001) and was higher in female compared to male psychotherapists (p = 0.021). In all countries, the number of patients treated on average per week in personal contact decreased (p < 0.001) and remote psychotherapies increased (p < 0.001), with more patients being treated via internet than via telephone during the COVID-19 situation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, female psychotherapists treated less patients in personal contact (p = 0.036), while they treated more patients via telephone than their male colleagues (p = 0.015). Overall, the total number of patients treated did not differ during COVID-19 from the months before (p = 0.133) and psychotherapy in personal contact remained the most common treatment modality. Results imply that the supply of mental health care could be maintained during COVID-19 and that changes in the provision of psychotherapy vary among countries and gender.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20024903
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210329091255.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijerph17134811 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32635422
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Humer, Elke $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
245    10
$a Provision of Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak Psychotherapists / $c E. Humer, C. Pieh, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, R. Trnka, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, T. Probst,
520    9_
$a Psychotherapists around the world are facing an unprecedented situation with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To combat the rapid spread of the virus, direct contact with others has to be avoided when possible. Therefore, remote psychotherapy provides a valuable option to continue mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study investigated the fear of psychotherapists to become infected with COVID-19 during psychotherapy in personal contact and assessed how the provision of psychotherapy changed due to the COVID-19 situation and whether there were differences with regard to country and gender. Psychotherapists from three European countries: Czech Republic (CZ, n = 112), Germany (DE, n = 130) and Slovakia (SK, n = 96), with on average 77.8% female participants, completed an online survey. Participants rated the fear of COVID-19 infection during face-to-face psychotherapy and reported the number of patients treated on average per week (in personal contact, via telephone, via internet) during the COVID-19 situation as well as (retrospectively) in the months before. Fear of COVID-19 infection was highest in SK and lowest in DE (p < 0.001) and was higher in female compared to male psychotherapists (p = 0.021). In all countries, the number of patients treated on average per week in personal contact decreased (p < 0.001) and remote psychotherapies increased (p < 0.001), with more patients being treated via internet than via telephone during the COVID-19 situation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, female psychotherapists treated less patients in personal contact (p = 0.036), while they treated more patients via telephone than their male colleagues (p = 0.015). Overall, the total number of patients treated did not differ during COVID-19 from the months before (p = 0.133) and psychotherapy in personal contact remained the most common treatment modality. Results imply that the supply of mental health care could be maintained during COVID-19 and that changes in the provision of psychotherapy vary among countries and gender.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a Betacoronavirus $7 D000073640
650    _2
$a Coronavirus $7 D017934
650    _2
$a koronavirové infekce $x psychologie $7 D018352
650    _2
$a strach $7 D005239
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pandemie $7 D058873
650    _2
$a virová pneumonie $x psychologie $7 D011024
650    _2
$a psychoterapie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011613
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a telemedicína $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017216
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
651    _2
$a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pieh, Christoph $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
700    1_
$a Kuska, Martin $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
700    1_
$a Barke, Antonia $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Doering, Bettina K $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Gossmann, Katharina $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Trnka, Radek $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, 14900 Prague, Czech Republic. Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Meier, Zdeněk $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic. $7 xx0258416
700    1_
$a Kascakova, Natalia $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic. Psychiatric-Psychotherapeutic Outpatient Clinic, Pro mente sana, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Probst, Thomas $u Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
773    0_
$w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 17, č. 13 (2020)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32635422 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210329091206 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599048 $s 1115589
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 17 $c 13 $e 20200704 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...