• Something wrong with this record ?

Sentiment analysis as a measure of conservation culture in scientific literature

RJ. Lennox, D. Veríssimo, WM. Twardek, CR. Davis, I. Jarić,

. 2020 ; 34 (2) : 462-471. [pub] 20191001

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Culturomics is emerging as an important field within science, as a way to measure attitudes and beliefs and their dynamics across time and space via quantitative analysis of digitized data from literature, news, film, social media, and more. Sentiment analysis is a culturomics tool that, within the last decade, has provided a means to quantify the polarity of attitudes expressed within various media. Conservation science is a crisis discipline; therefore, accurate and effective communication are paramount. We investigated how conservation scientists communicate their findings through scientific journal articles. We analyzed 15,001 abstracts from articles published from 1998 to 2017 in 6 conservation-focused journals selected based on indexing in scientific databases. Articles were categorized by year, focal taxa, and the conservation status of the focal species. We calculated mean sentiment score for each abstract (mean adjusted z score) based on 4 lexicons (Jockers-Rinker, National Research Council, Bing, and AFINN). We found a significant positive annual trend in the sentiment scores of articles. We also observed a significant trend toward increasing negativity along the spectrum of conservation status categories (i.e., from least concern to extinct). There were some clear differences in the sentiments with which research on different taxa was reported, however. For example, abstracts mentioning lobe finned fishes tended to have high sentiment scores, which could be related to the rediscovery of the coelacanth driving a positive narrative. Contrastingly, abstracts mentioning elasmobranchs had low scores, possibly reflecting the negative sentiment score associated with the word shark. Sentiment analysis has applications in science, especially as it pertains to conservation psychology, and we suggest a new science-based lexicon be developed specifically for the field of conservation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025099
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155048.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/cobi.13404 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31379018
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lennox, Robert J $u NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Laboratory for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Nygårdsgaten 112, Bergen, 5008, Norway.
245    10
$a Sentiment analysis as a measure of conservation culture in scientific literature / $c RJ. Lennox, D. Veríssimo, WM. Twardek, CR. Davis, I. Jarić,
520    9_
$a Culturomics is emerging as an important field within science, as a way to measure attitudes and beliefs and their dynamics across time and space via quantitative analysis of digitized data from literature, news, film, social media, and more. Sentiment analysis is a culturomics tool that, within the last decade, has provided a means to quantify the polarity of attitudes expressed within various media. Conservation science is a crisis discipline; therefore, accurate and effective communication are paramount. We investigated how conservation scientists communicate their findings through scientific journal articles. We analyzed 15,001 abstracts from articles published from 1998 to 2017 in 6 conservation-focused journals selected based on indexing in scientific databases. Articles were categorized by year, focal taxa, and the conservation status of the focal species. We calculated mean sentiment score for each abstract (mean adjusted z score) based on 4 lexicons (Jockers-Rinker, National Research Council, Bing, and AFINN). We found a significant positive annual trend in the sentiment scores of articles. We also observed a significant trend toward increasing negativity along the spectrum of conservation status categories (i.e., from least concern to extinct). There were some clear differences in the sentiments with which research on different taxa was reported, however. For example, abstracts mentioning lobe finned fishes tended to have high sentiment scores, which could be related to the rediscovery of the coelacanth driving a positive narrative. Contrastingly, abstracts mentioning elasmobranchs had low scores, possibly reflecting the negative sentiment score associated with the word shark. Sentiment analysis has applications in science, especially as it pertains to conservation psychology, and we suggest a new science-based lexicon be developed specifically for the field of conservation.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a postoj $7 D001290
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a ryby $7 D005399
650    12
$a žraloci $7 D012754
650    12
$a sociální média $7 D061108
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Veríssimo, Diogo $u Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, U.K. Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, 34 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BD, U.K. Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA, 92027, U.S.A.
700    1_
$a Twardek, William M $u Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
700    1_
$a Davis, Colin R $u Insilicor Analytics, 98 Caroline Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 0S9, Canada.
700    1_
$a Jarić, Ivan $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 702/7, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Science, Department of Ecosystem Biology, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31a, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001224 $t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology $x 1523-1739 $g Roč. 34, č. 2 (2020), s. 462-471
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31379018 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155044 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599244 $s 1115785
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 34 $c 2 $d 462-471 $e 20191001 $i 1523-1739 $m Conservation biology $n Conserv. biol. $x MED00001224
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...