• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparing generalized and customized spread models for nonnative forest pests

EJ. Hudgins, AM. Liebhold, B. Leung,

. 2020 ; 30 (1) : e01988. [pub] 20191115

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025302

While generality is often desirable in ecology, customized models for individual species are thought to be more predictive by accounting for context specificity. However, fully customized models require more information for focal species. We focus on pest spread and ask: How much does predictive power differ between generalized and customized models? Further, we examine whether an intermediate "semi-generalized" model, combining elements of a general model with species-specific modifications, could yield predictive advantages. We compared predictive power of a generalized model applied to all forest pest species (the generalized dispersal kernel or GDK) to customized spread models for three invasive forest pests (beech bark disease [Cryptococcus fagisuga], gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar], and hemlock woolly adelgid [Adelges tsugae]), for which time-series data exist. We generated semi-generalized dispersal kernel models (SDK) through GDK correction factors based on additional species-specific information. We found that customized models were more predictive than the GDK by an average of 17% for the three species examined, although the GDK still had strong predictive ability (57% spatial variation explained). However, by combining the GDK with simple corrections into the SDK model, we attained a mean of 91% of the spatial variation explained, compared to 74% for the customized models. This is, to our knowledge, the first comparison of general and species-specific ecological spread models' predictive abilities. Our strong predictive results suggest that general models can be effectively synthesized with context-specific information for single species to respond quickly to invasions. We provided SDK forecasts to 2030 for all 63 United States pests in our data set.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025302
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155142.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/eap.1988 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31361929
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hudgins, Emma J $u Biology Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada.
245    10
$a Comparing generalized and customized spread models for nonnative forest pests / $c EJ. Hudgins, AM. Liebhold, B. Leung,
520    9_
$a While generality is often desirable in ecology, customized models for individual species are thought to be more predictive by accounting for context specificity. However, fully customized models require more information for focal species. We focus on pest spread and ask: How much does predictive power differ between generalized and customized models? Further, we examine whether an intermediate "semi-generalized" model, combining elements of a general model with species-specific modifications, could yield predictive advantages. We compared predictive power of a generalized model applied to all forest pest species (the generalized dispersal kernel or GDK) to customized spread models for three invasive forest pests (beech bark disease [Cryptococcus fagisuga], gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar], and hemlock woolly adelgid [Adelges tsugae]), for which time-series data exist. We generated semi-generalized dispersal kernel models (SDK) through GDK correction factors based on additional species-specific information. We found that customized models were more predictive than the GDK by an average of 17% for the three species examined, although the GDK still had strong predictive ability (57% spatial variation explained). However, by combining the GDK with simple corrections into the SDK model, we attained a mean of 91% of the spatial variation explained, compared to 74% for the customized models. This is, to our knowledge, the first comparison of general and species-specific ecological spread models' predictive abilities. Our strong predictive results suggest that general models can be effectively synthesized with context-specific information for single species to respond quickly to invasions. We provided SDK forecasts to 2030 for all 63 United States pests in our data set.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a lesy $7 D065928
650    12
$a Hemiptera $7 D006430
650    12
$a můry $7 D009036
650    _2
$a Tsuga $7 D028225
651    _2
$a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Liebhold, Andrew M $u Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, USA. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Leung, Brian $u Biology Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada. School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2A7, Canada.
773    0_
$w MED00158588 $t Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America $x 1051-0761 $g Roč. 30, č. 1 (2020), s. e01988
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31361929 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155139 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599447 $s 1115988
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 30 $c 1 $d e01988 $e 20191115 $i 1051-0761 $m Ecological applications $n Ecol Appl $x MED00158588
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...