Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

LOW DOSE BATH FROM IMPT VS. IMXT FOR THE PELVIC AREA WHEN TREATING ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER

M. Navrátil, V. Vondráček, M. Andrlík, J. Kubeš, J. Rosina, A. Grebenyuk,

. 2019 ; 186 (2-3) : 377-380. [pub] 2019Dec31

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

Twenty (10 intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and 10 intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) treatment plans for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma were compared in this study. All chosen patients were indicated for prostate and pelvic lymph nodes irradiation using simultaneous integrated boost technique. These patients represent typical specimen for this diagnose. IMPT irradiates just half of the tissue volume with a low dose (up to 10 cobalt gray equivalent) compared to IMXT without compromise in target volumes coverage and in this way reduces the risk of secondary cancer development or other possible complications.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025374
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240902110425.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/rpd/ncz235 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31711189
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Navrátil, Matěj $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic. Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sítná square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a LOW DOSE BATH FROM IMPT VS. IMXT FOR THE PELVIC AREA WHEN TREATING ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER / $c M. Navrátil, V. Vondráček, M. Andrlík, J. Kubeš, J. Rosina, A. Grebenyuk,
520    9_
$a Twenty (10 intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and 10 intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) treatment plans for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma were compared in this study. All chosen patients were indicated for prostate and pelvic lymph nodes irradiation using simultaneous integrated boost technique. These patients represent typical specimen for this diagnose. IMPT irradiates just half of the tissue volume with a low dose (up to 10 cobalt gray equivalent) compared to IMXT without compromise in target volumes coverage and in this way reduces the risk of secondary cancer development or other possible complications.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lymfatické uzliny $x účinky záření $7 D008198
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a kritické orgány $x účinky záření $7 D058958
650    _2
$a pánev $x účinky záření $7 D010388
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x radioterapie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a protonová terapie $x metody $7 D061766
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x metody $7 D050397
650    _2
$a rentgenová terapie $x metody $7 D014964
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vondráček, Vladimír $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic. Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sítná square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Andrlík, Michal $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic. Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sítná square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0322119
700    1_
$a Kubeš, Jiří $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic. Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sítná square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rosina, Jozef $u Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sítná square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Grebenyuk, Alexander $u Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo str. 6-8, 197022 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
773    0_
$w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 186, č. 2-3 (2019), s. 377-380
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711189 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240902110424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599519 $s 1116060
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 186 $c 2-3 $d 377-380 $e 2019Dec31 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...