• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan

TS. Meyhoff, PB. Hjortrup, MH. Møller, J. Wetterslev, T. Lange, MN. Kjaer, AB. Jonsson, CJS. Hjortsø, M. Cronhjort, JH. Laake, SM. Jakob, M. Nalos, V. Pettilä, I. van der Horst, M. Ostermann, P. Mouncey, K. Rowan, M. Cecconi, R. Ferrer, MLNG....

. 2019 ; 63 (9) : 1262-1271. [pub] 20190724

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025592

Grantová podpora
Sofus Friis' foundation - International
NNF17OC0028608 Novo Nordisk Foundation - International

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (IV) fluid is a key intervention in the management of septic shock. The benefits and harms of lower versus higher fluid volumes are unknown and thus clinical equipoise exists. We describe the protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan for the conservative versus liberal approach to fluid therapy of septic shock in the Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction versus standard care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. METHODS: CLASSIC trial is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, stratified, and analyst-blinded trial. We will allocate 1554 adult patients with septic shock, who are planned to be or are admitted to an ICU, to IV fluid restriction versus standard care. The primary outcome is mortality at day 90. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse reactions (SARs), days alive at day 90 without life support, days alive and out of the hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and cognitive function at 1 year. We will conduct the statistical analyses according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan, including three interim analyses. For the primary analysis, we will use logistic regression adjusted for the stratification variables comparing the two interventions in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. DISCUSSION: The CLASSIC trial results will provide important evidence to guide clinicians' choice regarding the IV fluid therapy in adults with septic shock.

Centre for Research in Intensive Care Copenhagen Denmark Copenhagen Trial Unit Centre for Clinical Intervention Research Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Herning Hospital Herning Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Lillebaelt Hospital Kolding Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Nordsjaellands Hospital University Hospital of Copenhagen Hillerød Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Randers Hospital Randers Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Viborg Hospital Viborg Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Anaesthesiology Division of Emergencies and Critical Care Rikshospitalet Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

Department of Clinical Science and Education Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden

Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Research in Intensive Care Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Intensive Care Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK

Department of Intensive Care Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain

Department of Intensive Care Medicine Humanitas Research Hospital Milan Italy

Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Bern University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Brussels Brussels Belgium

Department of Intensive Care University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm Sweden

Department of Public Health Section of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland

Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre London UK

Medical Intensive Care Unit Interni klinika Fakultni Nemocnice Plzen Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025592
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222154002.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/aas.13434 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31276193
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Meyhoff, Tine Sylvest $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
245    10
$a Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan / $c TS. Meyhoff, PB. Hjortrup, MH. Møller, J. Wetterslev, T. Lange, MN. Kjaer, AB. Jonsson, CJS. Hjortsø, M. Cronhjort, JH. Laake, SM. Jakob, M. Nalos, V. Pettilä, I. van der Horst, M. Ostermann, P. Mouncey, K. Rowan, M. Cecconi, R. Ferrer, MLNG. Malbrain, C. Ahlstedt, S. Hoffmann, MH. Bestle, L. Nebrich, L. Russell, M. Vang, ML. Rasmussen, C. Sølling, BS. Rasmussen, AC. Brøchner, A. Perner,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (IV) fluid is a key intervention in the management of septic shock. The benefits and harms of lower versus higher fluid volumes are unknown and thus clinical equipoise exists. We describe the protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan for the conservative versus liberal approach to fluid therapy of septic shock in the Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction versus standard care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. METHODS: CLASSIC trial is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, stratified, and analyst-blinded trial. We will allocate 1554 adult patients with septic shock, who are planned to be or are admitted to an ICU, to IV fluid restriction versus standard care. The primary outcome is mortality at day 90. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse reactions (SARs), days alive at day 90 without life support, days alive and out of the hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and cognitive function at 1 year. We will conduct the statistical analyses according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan, including three interim analyses. For the primary analysis, we will use logistic regression adjusted for the stratification variables comparing the two interventions in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. DISCUSSION: The CLASSIC trial results will provide important evidence to guide clinicians' choice regarding the IV fluid therapy in adults with septic shock.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
650    _2
$a kognice $7 D003071
650    _2
$a péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu $7 D003422
650    _2
$a interpretace statistických dat $7 D003627
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a tekutinová terapie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D005440
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a logistické modely $7 D016015
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pragmatické klinické studie jako téma $7 D064792
650    _2
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a septický šok $x mortalita $x psychologie $x terapie $7 D012772
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hjortrup, Peter Buhl $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Møller, Morten Hylander $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Wetterslev, Jørn $u Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Lange, Theis $u Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Kjaer, Maj-Brit Nørregaard $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Jonsson, Andreas Bender $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Hjortsø, Carl Johan Steensen $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Cronhjort, Maria $u Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Laake, Jon Henrik $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
700    1_
$a Jakob, Stephan M $u Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern (Inselspital), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Nalos, Marek $u Medical Intensive Care Unit, Interni klinika, Fakultni Nemocnice, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pettilä, Ville $u Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
700    1_
$a van der Horst, Iwan $u Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Ostermann, Marlies $u Department of Intensive Care, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Mouncey, Paul $u Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
700    1_
$a Rowan, Kathy $u Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
700    1_
$a Cecconi, Maurizio $u Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Ferrer, Ricard $u Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Malbrain, Manu L N G $u Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Jette, Belgium. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Ahlstedt, Christian $u Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Hoffmann, Søren $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Bestle, Morten Heiberg $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Nebrich, Lars $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Russell, Lene $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Vang, Marianne $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Rasmussen, Michael Lindhardt $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Sølling, Christoffer $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Rasmussen, Bodil Steen $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Brøchner, Anne Craveiro $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Perner, Anders $u Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
773    0_
$w MED00000016 $t Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica $x 1399-6576 $g Roč. 63, č. 9 (2019), s. 1262-1271
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31276193 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222153957 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599737 $s 1116278
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 63 $c 9 $d 1262-1271 $e 20190724 $i 1399-6576 $m Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica $n Acta Anaesthesiol Scand $x MED00000016
GRA    __
$p Sofus Friis' foundation $2 International
GRA    __
$a NNF17OC0028608 $p Novo Nordisk Foundation $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace