-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?
O. Mayer, J. Seidlerová, M. Mateřánková, J. Gelžinský, Š. Mareš, M. Rychecká, V. Svobodová, J. Bruthans, J. Filipovský,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
PubMed Central
od 2015
ProQuest Central
od 2019-01-01 do 2021-04-30
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2019-01-01 do 2021-04-30
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2012
PubMed
31475585
DOI
10.2217/cer-2018-0149
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- klinické protokoly MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku metody MeSH
- oscilometrie MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025750
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222154056.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2217/cer-2018-0149 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31475585
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Mayer, Otto $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey? / $c O. Mayer, J. Seidlerová, M. Mateřánková, J. Gelžinský, Š. Mareš, M. Rychecká, V. Svobodová, J. Bruthans, J. Filipovský,
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a krevní tlak $7 D001794
- 650 _2
- $a měření krevního tlaku $x metody $7 D001795
- 650 _2
- $a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a oscilometrie $7 D009991
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Seidlerová, Jitka $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mateřánková, Markéta $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gelžinský, Julius $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mareš, Štěpán $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rychecká, Martina $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodová, Veronika $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bruthans, Jan $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention of the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University & Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Filipovský, Jan $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University & University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195023 $t Journal of comparative effectiveness research $x 2042-6313 $g Roč. 8, č. 11 (2019), s. 841-852
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475585 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222154051 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599895 $s 1116436
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 8 $c 11 $d 841-852 $e 20190902 $i 2042-6313 $m Journal of comparative effectiveness research $n J Comp Eff Res $x MED00195023
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125