Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effect of impaired cardiac conduction after alcohol septal ablation on clinical outcomes: insights from the Euro-ASA registry

MK. Jensen, L. Faber, M. Liebregts, J. Januska, J. Krejci, T. Bartel, RM. Cooper, M. Dabrowski, PR. Hansen, VM. Almaas, H. Seggewiss, D. Horstkotte, R. Adlova, JT. Berg, H. Bundgaard, J. Veselka,

. 2019 ; 5 (3) : 252-258. [pub] 20190701

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025796

E-zdroje NLK Online Plný text

ProQuest Central od 2016-10-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2016-10-01 do Před 1 rokem

AIMS: We analysed the impact of bundle branch block (BBB) and pacemaker (PM) implantation on symptoms and survival after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 1416 HCM patients from the Euro-ASA registry, 58 (4%) patients had a PM and 64 (5%) patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) before ASA. At latest follow-up (5.0 ± 4.0 years) after ASA, 118 (8%) patients had an ICD and 229 (16%) patients had a PM. In patients without an implantable device prior to ASA 13% had a PM and 5% had an ICD implanted following ASA. New onset BBB was present in 44% (right BBB in 31%) of patients without previous BBB. At latest follow-up, we found no associations between BBB and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 3-4 [odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.51; P = 0.91] or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Class 3-4 (OR 1.5, CI 0.32-6.7; P = 0.62), respectively, and no associations between PM and NYHA Class 3-4 (OR 1.2, CI 0.70-2.0; P = 0.52) or CCS 3-4 (OR 1.3, CI 0.24-6.6; P = 0.79), respectively. The survival after ASA was not reduced in patients with BBB [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, CI 0.53-1.01; P = 0.06] or PM (HR 0.78, CI 0.52-1.17; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Development of BBB or need for a PM after ASA in patients with obstructive HCM was not associated with inferior symptomatic outcome or reduced survival, thus concerns for the negative impact of impaired cardiac conduction on the clinical outcome after ASA were not confirmed.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025796
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222154110.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy049 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30304395
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Jensen, Morten Kvistholm $u Unit for Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Department of cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
245    10
$a Effect of impaired cardiac conduction after alcohol septal ablation on clinical outcomes: insights from the Euro-ASA registry / $c MK. Jensen, L. Faber, M. Liebregts, J. Januska, J. Krejci, T. Bartel, RM. Cooper, M. Dabrowski, PR. Hansen, VM. Almaas, H. Seggewiss, D. Horstkotte, R. Adlova, JT. Berg, H. Bundgaard, J. Veselka,
520    9_
$a AIMS: We analysed the impact of bundle branch block (BBB) and pacemaker (PM) implantation on symptoms and survival after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 1416 HCM patients from the Euro-ASA registry, 58 (4%) patients had a PM and 64 (5%) patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) before ASA. At latest follow-up (5.0 ± 4.0 years) after ASA, 118 (8%) patients had an ICD and 229 (16%) patients had a PM. In patients without an implantable device prior to ASA 13% had a PM and 5% had an ICD implanted following ASA. New onset BBB was present in 44% (right BBB in 31%) of patients without previous BBB. At latest follow-up, we found no associations between BBB and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 3-4 [odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.51; P = 0.91] or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Class 3-4 (OR 1.5, CI 0.32-6.7; P = 0.62), respectively, and no associations between PM and NYHA Class 3-4 (OR 1.2, CI 0.70-2.0; P = 0.52) or CCS 3-4 (OR 1.3, CI 0.24-6.6; P = 0.79), respectively. The survival after ASA was not reduced in patients with BBB [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, CI 0.53-1.01; P = 0.06] or PM (HR 0.78, CI 0.52-1.17; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Development of BBB or need for a PM after ASA in patients with obstructive HCM was not associated with inferior symptomatic outcome or reduced survival, thus concerns for the negative impact of impaired cardiac conduction on the clinical outcome after ASA were not confirmed.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a blokáda Tawarova raménka $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D002037
650    _2
$a hypertrofická kardiomyopatie $x terapie $7 D002312
650    12
$a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
650    _2
$a ethanol $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000431
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a kardiostimulátor $7 D010138
650    _2
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Faber, Lothar $u Clinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Liebregts, Max $u Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Januska, Jaroslav $u Cardiocentre Podlesí, Třinec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krejci, Jan $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bartel, Thomas $u Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
700    1_
$a Cooper, Robert M $u Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, England.
700    1_
$a Dabrowski, Maciej $u Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Hansen, Peter Riis $u Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Almaas, Vibeke Marie $u Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
700    1_
$a Seggewiss, Hubert $u Klinikum Würzburg-Mitte, Juliusspital, Würzburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Horstkotte, Dieter $u Clinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Adlova, Radka $u Department of Cardiology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Berg, Jurriën Ten $u Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Bundgaard, Henning $u Unit for Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Veselka, Josef $u Department of Cardiology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00200141 $t European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes $x 2058-1742 $g Roč. 5, č. 3 (2019), s. 252-258
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30304395 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222154105 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599941 $s 1116482
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 5 $c 3 $d 252-258 $e 20190701 $i 2058-1742 $m European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes $n Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes $x MED00200141
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...