-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial ablation in swine versus canine models
G. Caluori, A. Wojtaszczyk, O. Yasin, M. Pesl, J. Wolf, S. Belaskova, M. Crha, A. Sugrue, VR. Vaidya, N. Naksuk, CV. DeSimone, AM. Killu, D. Padmanabhan, SJ. Asirvatham, Z. Stárek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 1978-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1978-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
30989679
DOI
10.1111/pace.13698
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- katetrizační ablace metody MeSH
- komorová tachykardie etiologie MeSH
- modely nemocí na zvířatech * MeSH
- perikard chirurgie MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- psi MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- psi MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Choosing the appropriate animal model for development of novel technologies requires an understanding of anatomy and physiology of these different models. There are little data about the characteristics of different animal models for the study of technologies used for epicardial ablation. We aimed to compare the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial radiofrequency ablation between swine and canine models using novel epicardial ablation catheters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data obtained from epicardial ablation experiments performed on swine (Sus Scrofa) and canine (Canis familiaris) models. We compared the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during ablation between swine and canine using multivariate regression analysis. Six swine and six canine animals underwent successful epicardial radiofrequency ablation. A total of 103 ablation applications were recorded. RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardioversion occurred in 13.11% of radiofrequency ablation applications in swine and 9.75% in canine (relative risk: 117.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.97-164.69, animal-based odds ratio [OR]: .55, 95% CI: .23-61.33; P = .184). When adjusting for application position, duration of ablation and power, the odds of developing potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia in swine increased significantly compared to canine (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.35-9.55; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: The swine myocardium is more susceptible to developing ventricular arrhythmias compared to canine model during epicardial ablation. This issue should be carefully considered in future studies.
Division of Cardiovascular Disease Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025811
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155440.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/pace.13698 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30989679
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Caluori, Guido $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Comparing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial ablation in swine versus canine models / $c G. Caluori, A. Wojtaszczyk, O. Yasin, M. Pesl, J. Wolf, S. Belaskova, M. Crha, A. Sugrue, VR. Vaidya, N. Naksuk, CV. DeSimone, AM. Killu, D. Padmanabhan, SJ. Asirvatham, Z. Stárek,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Choosing the appropriate animal model for development of novel technologies requires an understanding of anatomy and physiology of these different models. There are little data about the characteristics of different animal models for the study of technologies used for epicardial ablation. We aimed to compare the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial radiofrequency ablation between swine and canine models using novel epicardial ablation catheters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data obtained from epicardial ablation experiments performed on swine (Sus Scrofa) and canine (Canis familiaris) models. We compared the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during ablation between swine and canine using multivariate regression analysis. Six swine and six canine animals underwent successful epicardial radiofrequency ablation. A total of 103 ablation applications were recorded. RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardioversion occurred in 13.11% of radiofrequency ablation applications in swine and 9.75% in canine (relative risk: 117.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.97-164.69, animal-based odds ratio [OR]: .55, 95% CI: .23-61.33; P = .184). When adjusting for application position, duration of ablation and power, the odds of developing potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia in swine increased significantly compared to canine (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.35-9.55; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: The swine myocardium is more susceptible to developing ventricular arrhythmias compared to canine model during epicardial ablation. This issue should be carefully considered in future studies.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
- 650 12
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 _2
- $a psi $7 D004285
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a perikard $x chirurgie $7 D010496
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 _2
- $a komorová tachykardie $x etiologie $7 D017180
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Wojtaszczyk, Adam $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. 3rd Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Yasin, Omar $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Pesl, Martin $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St. Anne´s Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wolf, Jiří $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Belaskova, Silvie $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Crha, Michal $u University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sugrue, Alan $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Vaidya, Vaibhav R $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Naksuk, Niyada $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a DeSimone, Christopher V $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Killu, Ammar M $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Padmanabhan, Deepak $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Asirvatham, Samuel J $u Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- 700 1_
- $a Stárek, Zdeněk $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St. Anne´s Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003671 $t Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE $x 1540-8159 $g Roč. 42, č. 7 (2019), s. 862-867
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30989679 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155436 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599956 $s 1116497
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 42 $c 7 $d 862-867 $e 20190429 $i 1540-8159 $m Pacing and clinical electrophysiology $n Pacing Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00003671
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125