• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

T. Van den Broeck, RCN. van den Bergh, N. Arfi, T. Gross, L. Moris, E. Briers, M. Cumberbatch, M. De Santis, D. Tilki, S. Fanti, N. Fossati, S. Gillessen, JP. Grummet, AM. Henry, M. Lardas, M. Liew, O. Rouvière, J. Pecanka, MD. Mason, IG....

. 2019 ; 75 (6) : 967-987. [pub] 20181017

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025834

CONTEXT: In men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with curative intent, controversy exists regarding the impact of biochemical recurrence (BCR) on oncological outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature on BCR after treatment with curative intent for nonmetastatic PCa. Objective 1 is to investigate whether oncological outcomes differ between patients with or without BCR. Objective 2 is to study which clinical factors and tumor features in patients with BCR have an independent prognostic impact on oncological outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. For objective 1, prospective and retrospective studies comparing survival outcomes of patients with or without BCR following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radical radiotherapy (RT) were included. For objective 2, all studies with at least 100 participants and reporting on prognostic patient and tumor characteristics in patients with BCR were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Both a narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were undertaken. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 77 studies were included for analysis, of which 14 addressed objective 1, recruiting 20 406 patients. Objective 2 was addressed by 71 studies with 29 057, 11 301, and 4272 patients undergoing RP, RT, and a mixed population (mix of patients undergoing RP or RT as primary treatment), respectively. There was a low risk of bias for study participation, confounders, and statistical analysis. For most studies, attrition bias, and prognostic and outcome measurements were not clearly reported. BCR was associated with worse survival rates, mainly in patients with short prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) and a high final Gleason score after RP, or a short interval to biochemical failure (IBF) after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: BCR has an impact on survival, but this effect appears to be limited to a subgroup of patients with specific clinical risk factors. Short PSA-DT and a high final Gleason score after RP, and a short IBF after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score are the main factors that have a negative impact on survival. These factors may form the basis of new BCR risk stratification (European Association of Urology BCR Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review looks at the risk of death in men who shows rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood test performed after curative surgery or radiotherapy. For many men, rising PSA does not mean that they are at a high risk of death from prostate cancer in the longer term. Men with PSA that rises shortly after they were treated with radiotherapy or rapidly rising PSA after surgery and a high tumor grade for both treatment modalities are at the highest risk of death. These factors may form the basis of new risk stratification (European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally.

Academic Urology Unit University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

Academic Urology Unit University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

Department of Oncology and Haematology Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

Department of Pathology Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

Department of Surgery Central Clinical School Monash University Caulfield North Victoria Australia

Department of Urology Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK

Department of Urology Hospital Saint Luc Saint Joseph Lyon France

Department of Urology Leto Hospital Athens Greece

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University Hospital Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology University Hospital St Etienne France

Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Urology University of Bern Inselspital Bern Switzerland

Department of Urology Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust Wigan UK

Division of Cancer and Genetics School of Medicine Cardiff University Velindre Cancer Centre Cardiff UK

Division of Cancer Sciences University of Manchester and The Christie Manchester UK

Hasselt Belgium

Hospices Civils de Lyon Radiology Department Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon France

Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Leeds Cancer Centre St James's University Hospital and University of Leeds Leeds UK

Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Nuclear Medicine Division Policlinico S Orsola University of Bologna Italy

Pecanka Consulting Services Prague Czech Republic

Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust Liverpool UK

Unit of Urology Division of Oncology URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milan Italy

Università Vita Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025834
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222160412.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30342843
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Van den Broeck, Thomas $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: vandenbroeck.thomas@gmail.com.
245    10
$a Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review / $c T. Van den Broeck, RCN. van den Bergh, N. Arfi, T. Gross, L. Moris, E. Briers, M. Cumberbatch, M. De Santis, D. Tilki, S. Fanti, N. Fossati, S. Gillessen, JP. Grummet, AM. Henry, M. Lardas, M. Liew, O. Rouvière, J. Pecanka, MD. Mason, IG. Schoots, TH. van Der Kwast, HG. van Der Poel, T. Wiegel, PM. Willemse, Y. Yuan, TB. Lam, P. Cornford, N. Mottet,
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: In men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with curative intent, controversy exists regarding the impact of biochemical recurrence (BCR) on oncological outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature on BCR after treatment with curative intent for nonmetastatic PCa. Objective 1 is to investigate whether oncological outcomes differ between patients with or without BCR. Objective 2 is to study which clinical factors and tumor features in patients with BCR have an independent prognostic impact on oncological outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. For objective 1, prospective and retrospective studies comparing survival outcomes of patients with or without BCR following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radical radiotherapy (RT) were included. For objective 2, all studies with at least 100 participants and reporting on prognostic patient and tumor characteristics in patients with BCR were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Both a narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were undertaken. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 77 studies were included for analysis, of which 14 addressed objective 1, recruiting 20 406 patients. Objective 2 was addressed by 71 studies with 29 057, 11 301, and 4272 patients undergoing RP, RT, and a mixed population (mix of patients undergoing RP or RT as primary treatment), respectively. There was a low risk of bias for study participation, confounders, and statistical analysis. For most studies, attrition bias, and prognostic and outcome measurements were not clearly reported. BCR was associated with worse survival rates, mainly in patients with short prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) and a high final Gleason score after RP, or a short interval to biochemical failure (IBF) after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: BCR has an impact on survival, but this effect appears to be limited to a subgroup of patients with specific clinical risk factors. Short PSA-DT and a high final Gleason score after RP, and a short IBF after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score are the main factors that have a negative impact on survival. These factors may form the basis of new BCR risk stratification (European Association of Urology BCR Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review looks at the risk of death in men who shows rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood test performed after curative surgery or radiotherapy. For many men, rising PSA does not mean that they are at a high risk of death from prostate cancer in the longer term. Men with PSA that rises shortly after they were treated with radiotherapy or rapidly rising PSA after surgery and a high tumor grade for both treatment modalities are at the highest risk of death. These factors may form the basis of new risk stratification (European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kalikreiny $x krev $7 D007610
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x krev $x mortalita $7 D009364
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prostatický specifický antigen $x krev $7 D017430
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x krev $x mortalita $7 D011471
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a van den Bergh, Roderick C N $u Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Arfi, Nicolas $u Department of Urology, Hospital Saint Luc Saint Joseph, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Gross, Tobias $u Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Moris, Lisa $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Briers, Erik $u Hasselt, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Cumberbatch, Marcus $u Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
700    1_
$a De Santis, Maria $u Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Tilki, Derya $u Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Fanti, Stefano $u Nuclear Medicine Division, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Fossati, Nicola $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Gillessen, Silke $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie, Manchester, UK; Department of Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Grummet, Jeremy P $u Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Caulfield North, Victoria, Australia.
700    1_
$a Henry, Ann M $u Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
700    1_
$a Lardas, Michael $u Department of Urology, Leto Hospital, Athens, Greece.
700    1_
$a Liew, Matthew $u Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK.
700    1_
$a Rouvière, Olivier $u Hospices Civils de Lyon, Radiology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Pecanka, Jakub $u Pecanka Consulting Services, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Mason, Malcolm D $u Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
700    1_
$a Schoots, Ivo G $u Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van Der Kwast, Theo H $u Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van Der Poel, Henk G $u Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Wiegel, Thomas $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
700    1_
$a Willemse, Peter-Paul M $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Yuan, Yuhong $u Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
700    1_
$a Lam, Thomas B $u Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
700    1_
$a Cornford, Philip $u Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
700    1_
$a Mottet, Nicolas $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France.
773    0_
$w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 75, č. 6 (2019), s. 967-987
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30342843 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222160408 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599979 $s 1116520
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 75 $c 6 $d 967-987 $e 20181017 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...