-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Arteriovenous Grafts' Types of Indications and Their Infection Rate
J. Janeckova, P. Bachleda, P. Utikal, J. Jarosciakova, J. Orsag,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- arteriovenózní zkrat škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- cévní protézy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- cévy - implantace protéz škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- dialýza ledvin MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- infekce spojené s protézou diagnóza etiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průchodnost cév MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous graft infection is a well-known and frequent complication. The objective of this study was to compare infection rates of primary and secondary indicated arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we evaluated the indications for AVGs created at our institution which became infected. One hundred forty AVGs were evaluated. Of these AVGs, 33 (23.6%) were primary and 107 (76.4%) secondary indicated. RESULTS: Infection of a primary AVG was detected in 5 patients (15.2 %). Infection of a secondary AVG was detected in 30 patients (28.0%). Primary and secondary patency were significantly lower in patients with infected AVG (P = 0.006; P = 0.0001). The effect of diabetes mellitus and age on development of infection was not confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for AVG creation clearly influence the future risk of infection. If the indication to use the AVG is to correct a complicated arteriovenous fistula, the risk of infection is 2 times higher.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027660
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152213.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32561242
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Janeckova, Jana $u Department of Surgery II, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jana.fialova@email.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Arteriovenous Grafts' Types of Indications and Their Infection Rate / $c J. Janeckova, P. Bachleda, P. Utikal, J. Jarosciakova, J. Orsag,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous graft infection is a well-known and frequent complication. The objective of this study was to compare infection rates of primary and secondary indicated arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we evaluated the indications for AVGs created at our institution which became infected. One hundred forty AVGs were evaluated. Of these AVGs, 33 (23.6%) were primary and 107 (76.4%) secondary indicated. RESULTS: Infection of a primary AVG was detected in 5 patients (15.2 %). Infection of a secondary AVG was detected in 30 patients (28.0%). Primary and secondary patency were significantly lower in patients with infected AVG (P = 0.006; P = 0.0001). The effect of diabetes mellitus and age on development of infection was not confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for AVG creation clearly influence the future risk of infection. If the indication to use the AVG is to correct a complicated arteriovenous fistula, the risk of infection is 2 times higher.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a arteriovenózní zkrat $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D001166
- 650 _2
- $a cévní protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001807
- 650 _2
- $a cévy - implantace protéz $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D019917
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a infekce spojené s protézou $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D016459
- 650 _2
- $a dialýza ledvin $7 D006435
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a průchodnost cév $7 D014654
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bachleda, Petr $u Department of Surgery II, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Utikal, Petr $u Department of Surgery II, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jarosciakova, Julia $u Department of Surgery II, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Orsag, Jiri $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Internal Medicine III, Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005646 $t Annals of vascular surgery $x 1615-5947 $g Roč. 69, č. - (2020), s. 232-236
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32561242 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152211 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1607995 $s 1118840
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 69 $c - $d 232-236 $e 20200616 $i 1615-5947 $m Annals of vascular surgery $n Ann Vasc Surg $x MED00005646
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105
