-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Privacy Is Dead - Solutions for Privacy-Enabled Collections and Use of Personal Health Information in Digital Era
P. Ruotsalainen, B. Blobel,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33087593
DOI
10.3233/shti200616
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- důvěra MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- soukromí * MeSH
- zdravotní záznamy osobní * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Today's digital information systems and applications collect every day a huge amount of personal health information (PHI) from sensor and surveillance systems, and every time we use personal computers or mobile phones. Collected data is processed in clouds, platforms and ecosystems by digital algorithms and machine learning. Pervasive technology, insufficient and ineffective privacy legislation, strong ICT industry and low political will to protect data subject's privacy have together made it almost impossible for a user to know what PHI is collected, how it is used and to whom it is disclosed. Service providers' and organizations' privacy policy documents are cumbersome and they do not guarantee that PHI is not misused. Instead, service users are expected to blindly trust in privacy promises made. In spite of that, majority of individuals are concerned of their privacy, and governments' assurance that they meet the responsibility to protect citizens in real life privacy is actually dead. Because PHI is probably the most sensitive data we have, and the authors claim it cannot be a commodity or public good, they have studied novel privacy approaches to find a way out from the current unsatisfactory situation. Based on findings got, the authors have developed a promising solution for privacy-enabled use of PHI. It is a combination of the concept of information fiduciary duty, Privacy as Trust approach, and privacy by smart contract. This approach shifts the onus of privacy protection onto data collectors and service providers. A specific information fiduciary duty law is needed to harmonize privacy requirements and force the acceptance of proposed solutions. Furthermore, the authors have studied strengths and weaknesses of existing or emerging solutions.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027851
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152504.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3233/SHTI200616 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33087593
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Ruotsalainen, Pekka $u Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences (ITC), Tampere University, Finland.
- 245 10
- $a Privacy Is Dead - Solutions for Privacy-Enabled Collections and Use of Personal Health Information in Digital Era / $c P. Ruotsalainen, B. Blobel,
- 520 9_
- $a Today's digital information systems and applications collect every day a huge amount of personal health information (PHI) from sensor and surveillance systems, and every time we use personal computers or mobile phones. Collected data is processed in clouds, platforms and ecosystems by digital algorithms and machine learning. Pervasive technology, insufficient and ineffective privacy legislation, strong ICT industry and low political will to protect data subject's privacy have together made it almost impossible for a user to know what PHI is collected, how it is used and to whom it is disclosed. Service providers' and organizations' privacy policy documents are cumbersome and they do not guarantee that PHI is not misused. Instead, service users are expected to blindly trust in privacy promises made. In spite of that, majority of individuals are concerned of their privacy, and governments' assurance that they meet the responsibility to protect citizens in real life privacy is actually dead. Because PHI is probably the most sensitive data we have, and the authors claim it cannot be a commodity or public good, they have studied novel privacy approaches to find a way out from the current unsatisfactory situation. Based on findings got, the authors have developed a promising solution for privacy-enabled use of PHI. It is a combination of the concept of information fiduciary duty, Privacy as Trust approach, and privacy by smart contract. This approach shifts the onus of privacy protection onto data collectors and service providers. A specific information fiduciary duty law is needed to harmonize privacy requirements and force the acceptance of proposed solutions. Furthermore, the authors have studied strengths and weaknesses of existing or emerging solutions.
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 12
- $a zdravotní záznamy osobní $7 D055991
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a soukromí $7 D018907
- 650 _2
- $a důvěra $7 D035502
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Blobel, Bernd $u Medical Faculty, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. eHealth Competence Center Bavaria,Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180836 $t Studies in health technology and informatics $x 1879-8365 $g Roč. 273, č. - (2020), s. 63-74
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33087593 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152502 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608186 $s 1119031
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 273 $c - $d 63-74 $e 2020Sep04 $i 1879-8365 $m Studies in health technology and informatics $n Stud Health Technol Inform $x MED00180836
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105