Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Oral and vaginal microbiota in selected field mice of the genus Apodemus: a wild population study

T. Matějková, P. Hájková, R. Stopková, M. Stanko, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger, P. Stopka,

. 2020 ; 10 (1) : 13246. [pub] 20200806

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Animal-associated microbiota is expected to impose crucial effects on the host's fitness-related performance, including reproduction. Most research to date has focused on interactions between the host with its gut microbiota; however, there remain considerable gaps in knowledge regarding microbial consortia in other organs, including interspecific divergence, temporal stability, variation drivers, and their effects on the host. To fill these gaps, we examined oral and vaginal microbiota composition in four free-living mouse species of the genus Apodemus, each varying in the degree of female promiscuity. To assess temporal stability and microbiota resistance to environmental change, we exposed one of the species, Apodemus uralensis, to standardized captive conditions and analyzed longitudinal changes in its microbiota structure. Our results revealed the existence of a "core" oral microbiota that was not only shared among all four species but also persisted almost unchanged in captivity. On the other hand, vaginal microbiota appears to be more plastic in captive conditions and less species-specific in comparison with oral microbiota. This study is amongst the first to describe oral microbiota dynamics. Furthermore, the vaginal microbiota results are especially surprising in light of the well-known role of stable vaginal microbiota as a defense against pathogens. The results indicate the existence of diverse mechanisms that shape each microbiota. On the other hand, our data provides somewhat ambiguous support for the systematic effect of phylogeny and social system on both oral and vaginal microbiota structures.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20027946
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114152648.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-020-70249-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32764739
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Matějková, Tereza $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Oral and vaginal microbiota in selected field mice of the genus Apodemus: a wild population study / $c T. Matějková, P. Hájková, R. Stopková, M. Stanko, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger, P. Stopka,
520    9_
$a Animal-associated microbiota is expected to impose crucial effects on the host's fitness-related performance, including reproduction. Most research to date has focused on interactions between the host with its gut microbiota; however, there remain considerable gaps in knowledge regarding microbial consortia in other organs, including interspecific divergence, temporal stability, variation drivers, and their effects on the host. To fill these gaps, we examined oral and vaginal microbiota composition in four free-living mouse species of the genus Apodemus, each varying in the degree of female promiscuity. To assess temporal stability and microbiota resistance to environmental change, we exposed one of the species, Apodemus uralensis, to standardized captive conditions and analyzed longitudinal changes in its microbiota structure. Our results revealed the existence of a "core" oral microbiota that was not only shared among all four species but also persisted almost unchanged in captivity. On the other hand, vaginal microbiota appears to be more plastic in captive conditions and less species-specific in comparison with oral microbiota. This study is amongst the first to describe oral microbiota dynamics. Furthermore, the vaginal microbiota results are especially surprising in light of the well-known role of stable vaginal microbiota as a defense against pathogens. The results indicate the existence of diverse mechanisms that shape each microbiota. On the other hand, our data provides somewhat ambiguous support for the systematic effect of phylogeny and social system on both oral and vaginal microbiota structures.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a ústa $x mikrobiologie $7 D009055
650    _2
$a orgánová specificita $7 D009928
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $x metody $7 D017422
650    _2
$a vagina $x mikrobiologie $7 D014621
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hájková, Petra $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stopková, Romana $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stanko, Michal $u Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Martin, Jean-François $u Montpellier-SupAgro, UMR Centre de Biologie Pour La Gestion Des Populations, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
700    1_
$a Kreisinger, Jakub $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. jakubkreisinger@seznam.cz.
700    1_
$a Stopka, Pavel $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. pstopka@natur.cuni.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2020), s. 13246
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32764739 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114152646 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608281 $s 1119126
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 10 $c 1 $d 13246 $e 20200806 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...