-
Something wrong with this record ?
Enzymatic methods may underestimate the total serum bile acid concentration
K. Žížalová, M. Vecka, L. Vítek, M. Leníček,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- 3-alpha-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase (B-Specific) chemistry MeSH
- Cholestasis metabolism MeSH
- Enzyme Assays methods MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Bile Acids and Salts blood MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Enzymatic assays based on bacterial 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase are the method of choice for quantification of total bile acids (BAs) in serum. Although non-specific, it is generally considered precise and robust. The aim of this study was to investigate how changes in the BA spectrum might affect the reliability of the method. We measured standard solutions of twenty-three human and murine BAs using a commercial enzymatic assay and compared the measured vs. expected concentrations. Additionally, total BA concentrations in rat and human cholestatic samples with an abnormal BA spectrum were measured using an enzymatic assay, and a more specific LC-MS/MS method. We observed a great variability in the response of individual BAs in the enzymatic assay. Relative signal intensities ranged from 100% in glycocholic acid (reference) to only 20% in α-muricholic acid. The enzymatic assay markedly underestimated the BA concentrations in both human and rat cholestatic sera when compared to the LC-MS/MS assay. Our study indicated that the performance of an enzymatic assay largely depends on the BA spectrum, and the total concentration of BAs can be markedly underestimated. Samples with an atypical BA spectrum (viz. in rodents) should preferably be measured by other methods.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028003
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152757.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0236372 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32706797
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Žížalová, Kateřina $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Enzymatic methods may underestimate the total serum bile acid concentration / $c K. Žížalová, M. Vecka, L. Vítek, M. Leníček,
- 520 9_
- $a Enzymatic assays based on bacterial 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase are the method of choice for quantification of total bile acids (BAs) in serum. Although non-specific, it is generally considered precise and robust. The aim of this study was to investigate how changes in the BA spectrum might affect the reliability of the method. We measured standard solutions of twenty-three human and murine BAs using a commercial enzymatic assay and compared the measured vs. expected concentrations. Additionally, total BA concentrations in rat and human cholestatic samples with an abnormal BA spectrum were measured using an enzymatic assay, and a more specific LC-MS/MS method. We observed a great variability in the response of individual BAs in the enzymatic assay. Relative signal intensities ranged from 100% in glycocholic acid (reference) to only 20% in α-muricholic acid. The enzymatic assay markedly underestimated the BA concentrations in both human and rat cholestatic sera when compared to the LC-MS/MS assay. Our study indicated that the performance of an enzymatic assay largely depends on the BA spectrum, and the total concentration of BAs can be markedly underestimated. Samples with an atypical BA spectrum (viz. in rodents) should preferably be measured by other methods.
- 650 _2
- $a 3-alfa-hydroxysteroiddehydrogenasa (B-specifická) $x chemie $7 D045002
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a žlučové kyseliny a soli $x krev $7 D001647
- 650 _2
- $a cholestáza $x metabolismus $7 D002779
- 650 _2
- $a enzymatické testy $x metody $7 D057075
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vecka, Marek $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vítek, Libor $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Leníček, Martin $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 7 (2020), s. e0236372
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32706797 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152755 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608338 $s 1119183
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 15 $c 7 $d e0236372 $e 20200724 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105