Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Enzymatic methods may underestimate the total serum bile acid concentration

K. Žížalová, M. Vecka, L. Vítek, M. Leníček,

. 2020 ; 15 (7) : e0236372. [pub] 20200724

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Enzymatic assays based on bacterial 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase are the method of choice for quantification of total bile acids (BAs) in serum. Although non-specific, it is generally considered precise and robust. The aim of this study was to investigate how changes in the BA spectrum might affect the reliability of the method. We measured standard solutions of twenty-three human and murine BAs using a commercial enzymatic assay and compared the measured vs. expected concentrations. Additionally, total BA concentrations in rat and human cholestatic samples with an abnormal BA spectrum were measured using an enzymatic assay, and a more specific LC-MS/MS method. We observed a great variability in the response of individual BAs in the enzymatic assay. Relative signal intensities ranged from 100% in glycocholic acid (reference) to only 20% in α-muricholic acid. The enzymatic assay markedly underestimated the BA concentrations in both human and rat cholestatic sera when compared to the LC-MS/MS assay. Our study indicated that the performance of an enzymatic assay largely depends on the BA spectrum, and the total concentration of BAs can be markedly underestimated. Samples with an atypical BA spectrum (viz. in rodents) should preferably be measured by other methods.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028003
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114152757.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0236372 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32706797
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Žížalová, Kateřina $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Enzymatic methods may underestimate the total serum bile acid concentration / $c K. Žížalová, M. Vecka, L. Vítek, M. Leníček,
520    9_
$a Enzymatic assays based on bacterial 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase are the method of choice for quantification of total bile acids (BAs) in serum. Although non-specific, it is generally considered precise and robust. The aim of this study was to investigate how changes in the BA spectrum might affect the reliability of the method. We measured standard solutions of twenty-three human and murine BAs using a commercial enzymatic assay and compared the measured vs. expected concentrations. Additionally, total BA concentrations in rat and human cholestatic samples with an abnormal BA spectrum were measured using an enzymatic assay, and a more specific LC-MS/MS method. We observed a great variability in the response of individual BAs in the enzymatic assay. Relative signal intensities ranged from 100% in glycocholic acid (reference) to only 20% in α-muricholic acid. The enzymatic assay markedly underestimated the BA concentrations in both human and rat cholestatic sera when compared to the LC-MS/MS assay. Our study indicated that the performance of an enzymatic assay largely depends on the BA spectrum, and the total concentration of BAs can be markedly underestimated. Samples with an atypical BA spectrum (viz. in rodents) should preferably be measured by other methods.
650    _2
$a 3-alfa-hydroxysteroiddehydrogenasa (B-specifická) $x chemie $7 D045002
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a žlučové kyseliny a soli $x krev $7 D001647
650    _2
$a cholestáza $x metabolismus $7 D002779
650    _2
$a enzymatické testy $x metody $7 D057075
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vecka, Marek $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vítek, Libor $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Leníček, Martin $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 7 (2020), s. e0236372
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32706797 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114152755 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608338 $s 1119183
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 15 $c 7 $d e0236372 $e 20200724 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...