• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Biochemical and mesophyll diffusional limits to photosynthesis are determined by prey and root nutrient uptake in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes × ventrata

S. Capó-Bauçà, M. Font-Carrascosa, M. Ribas-Carbó, A. Pavlovič, J. Galmés,

. 2020 ; 126 (1) : 25-37. [pub] 20200619

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028085
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants can enhance photosynthetic efficiency in response to prey nutrient uptake, but the underlying mechanisms of increased photosynthesis are largely unknown. Here we investigated photosynthesis in the pitcher plant Nepenthes × ventrata in response to different prey-derived and root mineral nutrition to reveal photosynthetic constrains. METHODS: Nutrient-stressed plants were irrigated with full inorganic solution or fed with four different insects: wasps, ants, beetles or flies. Full dissection of photosynthetic traits was achieved by means of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and immunodetection of photosynthesis-related proteins. Leaf biochemical and anatomical parameters together with mineral composition, nitrogen and carbon isotopic discrimination of leaves and insects were also analysed. KEY RESULTS: Mesophyll diffusion was the major photosynthetic limitation for nutrient-stressed Nepenthes × ventrata, while biochemistry was the major photosynthetic limitation after nutrient application. The better nutrient status of insect-fed and root-fertilized treatments increased chlorophyll, pigment-protein complexes and Rubisco content. As a result, both photochemical and carboxylation potential were enhanced, increasing carbon assimilation. Different nutrient application affected growth, and root-fertilized treatment led to the investment of more biomass in leaves instead of pitchers. CONCLUSIONS: The study resolved a 35-year-old hypothesis that carnivorous plants increase photosynthetic assimilation via the investment of prey-derived nitrogen in the photosynthetic apparatus. The equilibrium between biochemical and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis is strongly affected by the nutrient treatment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028085
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114152939.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcaa041 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32173732
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Capó-Bauçà, Sebastià $u Research Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears-INAGEA, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
245    10
$a Biochemical and mesophyll diffusional limits to photosynthesis are determined by prey and root nutrient uptake in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes × ventrata / $c S. Capó-Bauçà, M. Font-Carrascosa, M. Ribas-Carbó, A. Pavlovič, J. Galmés,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants can enhance photosynthetic efficiency in response to prey nutrient uptake, but the underlying mechanisms of increased photosynthesis are largely unknown. Here we investigated photosynthesis in the pitcher plant Nepenthes × ventrata in response to different prey-derived and root mineral nutrition to reveal photosynthetic constrains. METHODS: Nutrient-stressed plants were irrigated with full inorganic solution or fed with four different insects: wasps, ants, beetles or flies. Full dissection of photosynthetic traits was achieved by means of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and immunodetection of photosynthesis-related proteins. Leaf biochemical and anatomical parameters together with mineral composition, nitrogen and carbon isotopic discrimination of leaves and insects were also analysed. KEY RESULTS: Mesophyll diffusion was the major photosynthetic limitation for nutrient-stressed Nepenthes × ventrata, while biochemistry was the major photosynthetic limitation after nutrient application. The better nutrient status of insect-fed and root-fertilized treatments increased chlorophyll, pigment-protein complexes and Rubisco content. As a result, both photochemical and carboxylation potential were enhanced, increasing carbon assimilation. Different nutrient application affected growth, and root-fertilized treatment led to the investment of more biomass in leaves instead of pitchers. CONCLUSIONS: The study resolved a 35-year-old hypothesis that carnivorous plants increase photosynthetic assimilation via the investment of prey-derived nitrogen in the photosynthetic apparatus. The equilibrium between biochemical and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis is strongly affected by the nutrient treatment.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a oxid uhličitý $7 D002245
650    12
$a masožravci $7 D060435
650    _2
$a chlorofyl $7 D002734
650    _2
$a živiny $7 D000078622
650    _2
$a organické látky $7 D009930
650    12
$a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $7 D018515
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Font-Carrascosa, Marcel $u Research Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears-INAGEA, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
700    1_
$a Ribas-Carbó, Miquel $u Research Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears-INAGEA, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
700    1_
$a Pavlovič, Andrej $u Department of Biophysics, Centre of Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů, CZ, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Galmés, Jeroni $u Research Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears-INAGEA, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 126, č. 1 (2020), s. 25-37
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32173732 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114152937 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608420 $s 1119265
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 126 $c 1 $d 25-37 $e 20200619 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...