-
Something wrong with this record ?
Estimation of trophic niches in myrmecophagous spider predators
LP. Dušátková, S. Pekár, O. Michálek, E. Líznarová, WOC. Symondson,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Nature Open Access
from 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- DNA chemistry metabolism MeSH
- Ants genetics MeSH
- Spiders genetics physiology MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Predatory Behavior MeSH
- Cluster Analysis MeSH
- Body Size MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Among spiders, taxonomically the most diversified group of terrestrial predators, only a few species are stenophagous and feed on ants. The levels of stenophagy and ant-specialisation vary among such species. To investigate whether stenophagy is only a result of a local specialisation both fundamental and realised trophic niches need to be estimated. Here we investigated trophic niches in three closely-related spider species from the family Gnaphosidae (Callilepis nocturna, C. schuszteri, Nomisia exornata) with different levels of myrmecophagy. Acceptance experiments were used to estimate fundamental trophic niches and molecular methods to estimate realised trophic niches. For the latter two PCR primer sets were used as these can affect the niche breadth estimates. The general invertebrate ZBJ primers were not appropriate for detecting ant DNA as they revealed very few prey types, therefore ant-specific primers were used. The cut-off threshold for erroneous MOTUs was identified as 0.005% of the total number of valid sequences, at individual predator level it was 0.05%. The fundamental trophic niche of Callilepis species included mainly ants, while that of N. exornata included many different prey types. The realised trophic niche in Callilepis species was similar to its fundamental niche but in N. exornata the fundamental niche was wider than realised niche. The results show that Callilepis species are ant-eating (specialised) stenophagous predators, catching mainly Formicinae ants, while N. exornata is an ant-eating euryphagous predator catching mainly Myrmicinae ants.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028155
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210216145949.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-020-65623-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32457437
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Dušátková, Lenka Petráková $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Estimation of trophic niches in myrmecophagous spider predators / $c LP. Dušátková, S. Pekár, O. Michálek, E. Líznarová, WOC. Symondson,
- 520 9_
- $a Among spiders, taxonomically the most diversified group of terrestrial predators, only a few species are stenophagous and feed on ants. The levels of stenophagy and ant-specialisation vary among such species. To investigate whether stenophagy is only a result of a local specialisation both fundamental and realised trophic niches need to be estimated. Here we investigated trophic niches in three closely-related spider species from the family Gnaphosidae (Callilepis nocturna, C. schuszteri, Nomisia exornata) with different levels of myrmecophagy. Acceptance experiments were used to estimate fundamental trophic niches and molecular methods to estimate realised trophic niches. For the latter two PCR primer sets were used as these can affect the niche breadth estimates. The general invertebrate ZBJ primers were not appropriate for detecting ant DNA as they revealed very few prey types, therefore ant-specific primers were used. The cut-off threshold for erroneous MOTUs was identified as 0.005% of the total number of valid sequences, at individual predator level it was 0.05%. The fundamental trophic niche of Callilepis species included mainly ants, while that of N. exornata included many different prey types. The realised trophic niche in Callilepis species was similar to its fundamental niche but in N. exornata the fundamental niche was wider than realised niche. The results show that Callilepis species are ant-eating (specialised) stenophagous predators, catching mainly Formicinae ants, while N. exornata is an ant-eating euryphagous predator catching mainly Myrmicinae ants.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Formicidae $x genetika $7 D001000
- 650 _2
- $a velikost těla $7 D049628
- 650 _2
- $a shluková analýza $7 D016000
- 650 _2
- $a DNA $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D004247
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a predátorské chování $7 D011235
- 650 _2
- $a pavouci $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D013112
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Pekár, Stano, $d 1970- $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic. pekar@sci.muni.cz. $7 mzk2004237034
- 700 1_
- $a Michálek, Ondřej $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Líznarová, Eva $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Symondson, William O C $u Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, CF10 3AX, Cardiff, UK.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2020), s. 8683
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32457437 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210216145945 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608490 $s 1119335
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 10 $c 1 $d 8683 $e 20200526 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105