-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
An examination of the quality and performance of the Alda scale for classifying lithium response phenotypes
J. Scott, B. Etain, M. Manchia, C. Brichant-Petitjean, PA. Geoffroy, T. Schulze, M. Alda, F. Bellivier, ConLiGen collaborators,
Jazyk angličtina Země Dánsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31466131
DOI
10.1111/bdi.12829
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bipolární porucha MeSH
- fenotyp * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lithium MeSH
- psychometrie normy MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sloučeniny lithia farmakologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The Retrospective Assessment of the Lithium Response Phenotype Scale (Alda scale) is the most widely used clinical measure of lithium response phenotypes. We assess its performance against recommended psychometric and clinimetric standards. METHODS: We used data from the Consortium for Lithium Genetics and a French study of lithium response phenotypes (combined sample >2500) to assess reproducibility, responsiveness, validity, and interpretability of the A scale (assessing change in illness activity), the B scale, and its items (assessing confounders of response) and the previously established response categories derived from the Total Score for the Alda scale. RESULTS: The key findings are that the B scale is vulnerable to error measurement. For example, some items contribute little to overall performance of the Alda scale (eg, B2) and that the B scale does not reliably assess a single construct (uncertainty in response). Machine learning models indicate that it may be more useful to employ an algorithm for combining the ratings of individual B items in a sequence that clarifies the noise to signal ratio instead of using a composite score. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights three important topics. First, empirical approaches can help determine which aspects of the performance of any scale can be improved. Second, the B scale of the Alda is best applied as a multidimensional index (identifying several independent confounders of the assessment of response). Third, an integrated science approach to precision psychiatry is vital, otherwise phenotypic misclassifications will undermine the reliability and validity of findings from genetics and biomarker studies.
Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany
Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144 Paris France
Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144 Paris France EPS Maison Blanche Paris France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028195
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114153210.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 dk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/bdi.12829 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31466131
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a dk
- 100 1_
- $a Scott, Jan $u Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144, Paris, France.
- 245 13
- $a An examination of the quality and performance of the Alda scale for classifying lithium response phenotypes / $c J. Scott, B. Etain, M. Manchia, C. Brichant-Petitjean, PA. Geoffroy, T. Schulze, M. Alda, F. Bellivier, ConLiGen collaborators,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The Retrospective Assessment of the Lithium Response Phenotype Scale (Alda scale) is the most widely used clinical measure of lithium response phenotypes. We assess its performance against recommended psychometric and clinimetric standards. METHODS: We used data from the Consortium for Lithium Genetics and a French study of lithium response phenotypes (combined sample >2500) to assess reproducibility, responsiveness, validity, and interpretability of the A scale (assessing change in illness activity), the B scale, and its items (assessing confounders of response) and the previously established response categories derived from the Total Score for the Alda scale. RESULTS: The key findings are that the B scale is vulnerable to error measurement. For example, some items contribute little to overall performance of the Alda scale (eg, B2) and that the B scale does not reliably assess a single construct (uncertainty in response). Machine learning models indicate that it may be more useful to employ an algorithm for combining the ratings of individual B items in a sequence that clarifies the noise to signal ratio instead of using a composite score. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights three important topics. First, empirical approaches can help determine which aspects of the performance of any scale can be improved. Second, the B scale of the Alda is best applied as a multidimensional index (identifying several independent confounders of the assessment of response). Third, an integrated science approach to precision psychiatry is vital, otherwise phenotypic misclassifications will undermine the reliability and validity of findings from genetics and biomarker studies.
- 650 _2
- $a bipolární porucha $7 D001714
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lithium $7 D008094
- 650 _2
- $a sloučeniny lithia $x farmakologie $7 D018020
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $x normy $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Etain, Bruno $u Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144, Paris, France. Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, AP-HP, GH Saint-Louis-Lariboisière-F. Widal, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Manchia, Mirko $u Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Brichant-Petitjean, Clara $u Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144, Paris, France. EPS Maison Blanche, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Geoffroy, Pierre A $u Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Schulze, Thomas $u Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Alda, Martin $u Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bellivier, Frank $u Université Paris Diderot and INSERM UMRS1144, Paris, France. Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, AP-HP, GH Saint-Louis-Lariboisière-F. Widal, Paris, France.
- 710 2_
- $a ConLiGen collaborators
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007648 $t Bipolar disorders $x 1399-5618 $g Roč. 22, č. 3 (2020), s. 255-265
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31466131 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114153207 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608530 $s 1119375
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 22 $c 3 $d 255-265 $e 20190923 $i 1399-5618 $m Bipolar disorders $n Bipolar Disord $x MED00007648
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105