Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cavernous Sinus Versus Noncavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Outcomes and Outcome Predictors

YC. Hung, N. Mohammed, KN. Kearns, CJ. Chen, RM. Starke, H. Kano, J. Lee, D. Mathieu, AM. Kaufmann, WG. Wang, IS. Grills, CP. Cifarelli, J. Vargo, T. Chytka, L. Janouskova, CE. Feliciano, R. Rodriguez-Mercado, LD. Lunsford, JP. Sheehan,

. 2020 ; 86 (5) : 676-684. [pub] 20200501

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028220

Grantová podpora
U54 GM104942 NIGMS NIH HHS - United States

E-zdroje NLK Online Plný text

ProQuest Central od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) can be categorized based on location. OBJECTIVE: To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes between cavernous sinus (CS) and non-CS DAVFs and to identify respective outcome predictors. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of DAVFs treated with SRS between 1988 and 2016 at 10 institutions. Patients' variables, DAVF characters, and SRS parameters were included for analyses. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as angiography-confirmed obliteration without radiological radiation-induced changes (RIC) or post-SRS hemorrhage. Other outcomes were DAVFs obliteration and adverse events (including RIC, symptomatic RIC, and post-SRS hemorrhage). RESULTS: The overall study cohort comprised 131 patients, including 20 patients with CS DAVFs (15%) and 111 patients with non-CS DAVFs (85%). Rates of favorable clinical outcome were comparable between the 2 groups (45% vs 37%, P = .824). Obliteration rate after SRS was higher in the CS DAVFs group, even adjusted for baseline difference (OR = 4.189, P = .044). Predictors of favorable clinical outcome included higher maximum dose (P = .014) for CS DAVFs. Symptomatic improvement was associated with obliteration in non-CS DAVFs (P = .005), but symptoms improved regardless of whether obliteration was confirmed in CS DAVFs. Non-CS DAVFs patients with adverse events after SRS were more likely to be male (P = .020), multiple arterial feeding fistulas (P = .018), and lower maximum dose (P = .041). CONCLUSION: After SRS, CS DAVFs are more likely to obliterate than non-CS ones. Because these 2 groups have different total predictors for clinical and radiologic outcomes after SRS, they should be considered as different entities.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028220
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114153245.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/neuros/nyz260 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31384943
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hung, Yi-Chieh $u Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan. Department of Recreation and Healthcare Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
245    10
$a Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cavernous Sinus Versus Noncavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Outcomes and Outcome Predictors / $c YC. Hung, N. Mohammed, KN. Kearns, CJ. Chen, RM. Starke, H. Kano, J. Lee, D. Mathieu, AM. Kaufmann, WG. Wang, IS. Grills, CP. Cifarelli, J. Vargo, T. Chytka, L. Janouskova, CE. Feliciano, R. Rodriguez-Mercado, LD. Lunsford, JP. Sheehan,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) can be categorized based on location. OBJECTIVE: To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes between cavernous sinus (CS) and non-CS DAVFs and to identify respective outcome predictors. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of DAVFs treated with SRS between 1988 and 2016 at 10 institutions. Patients' variables, DAVF characters, and SRS parameters were included for analyses. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as angiography-confirmed obliteration without radiological radiation-induced changes (RIC) or post-SRS hemorrhage. Other outcomes were DAVFs obliteration and adverse events (including RIC, symptomatic RIC, and post-SRS hemorrhage). RESULTS: The overall study cohort comprised 131 patients, including 20 patients with CS DAVFs (15%) and 111 patients with non-CS DAVFs (85%). Rates of favorable clinical outcome were comparable between the 2 groups (45% vs 37%, P = .824). Obliteration rate after SRS was higher in the CS DAVFs group, even adjusted for baseline difference (OR = 4.189, P = .044). Predictors of favorable clinical outcome included higher maximum dose (P = .014) for CS DAVFs. Symptomatic improvement was associated with obliteration in non-CS DAVFs (P = .005), but symptoms improved regardless of whether obliteration was confirmed in CS DAVFs. Non-CS DAVFs patients with adverse events after SRS were more likely to be male (P = .020), multiple arterial feeding fistulas (P = .018), and lower maximum dose (P = .041). CONCLUSION: After SRS, CS DAVFs are more likely to obliterate than non-CS ones. Because these 2 groups have different total predictors for clinical and radiologic outcomes after SRS, they should be considered as different entities.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a sinus cavernosus $x patologie $7 D002426
650    _2
$a cévní malformace centrálního nervového systému $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D020785
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a radiochirurgie $x metody $7 D016634
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mohammed, Nasser $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
700    1_
$a Kearns, Kathryn N $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
700    1_
$a Chen, Ching-Jen $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
700    1_
$a Starke, Robert M $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
700    1_
$a Kano, Hideyuki $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
700    1_
$a Lee, John $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
700    1_
$a Mathieu, David $u Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
700    1_
$a Kaufmann, Anthony M $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
700    1_
$a Wang, Wei Gang $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
700    1_
$a Grills, Inga S $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
700    1_
$a Cifarelli, Christopher P $u Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
700    1_
$a Vargo, John $u Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
700    1_
$a Chytka, Tomas $u Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Janouskova, Ladislava $u Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Feliciano, Caleb E $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
700    1_
$a Rodriguez-Mercado, Rafael $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
700    1_
$a Lunsford, L Dade $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
700    1_
$a Sheehan, Jason P $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
773    0_
$w MED00003511 $t Neurosurgery $x 1524-4040 $g Roč. 86, č. 5 (2020), s. 676-684
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31384943 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114153242 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608555 $s 1119400
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 86 $c 5 $d 676-684 $e 20200501 $i 1524-4040 $m Neurosurgery $n Neurosurgery $x MED00003511
GRA    __
$a U54 GM104942 $p NIGMS NIH HHS $2 United States
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...