• Something wrong with this record ?

Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping

S. Hussain, T. Liu, N. Iqbal, M. Brestic, T. Pang, M. Mumtaz, I. Shafiq, S. Li, L. Wang, Y. Gao, A. Khan, I. Ahmad, SI. Allakhverdiev, W. Liu, W. Yang,

. 2020 ; 19 (4) : 462-472. [pub] 2020Apr15

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Soybean (Glycine max L.) has been extensively cultivated in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems in southwest China. However, during the early co-growth period, soybean seedlings suffer from severe shading by maize resulting in lodging and significant yield reduction. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the reasons behind severe lodging and yield loss. Therefore, four different soybean genotypes (B3, B15, B23, and B24) having different agronomic characteristics were cultivated in intercropping and monocropping planting patterns. The results showed that under different planting patterns, the stem resistance varied among genotypes (P < 0.01). The lodging resistance index of B3, B15, B23, and B24 genotypes was 70.9%, 60.5%, 65.2%, and 57.4%, respectively, under intercropping, among which the B24 genotype was less affected by the shade environment as there was little decrease in the lodging resistance index of this genotype under intercropping. The lignin content of B23 and B24 was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15 under both planting patterns. Under intercropping, the hemicellulose content of B23 and B24 stems was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15. Compared to the monocropping, the content of mannose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was decreased in all genotypes except B23, but the difference was not significant. The content of xylose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was significantly higher than that in B3 and B15. Mannose content showed no significant difference among genotypes. The arabinose content of B24 was significantly higher than that of B3, B15, and B23. The effective pod number, seed number per plant, seed weight per plant and yield of soybean plants were significantly decreased under intercropping. Conclusively, manipulation of structural and nonstructural carbohydrate rich soybean genotypes in intercropping systems could alleviate the yield loss due to lodging.

College of Agronomy Sichuan Agricultural University 211 Huimin Road Wenjiang District Chengdu 611130 P R China

College of Agronomy Sichuan Agricultural University 211 Huimin Road Wenjiang District Chengdu 611130 P R China and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China Sichuan Agricultural University Chengdu P R China

Department of Plant Physiology Slovak University of Agriculture 94976 Nitra Slovakia and Department of Botany and Plant Physiology Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague 165 00 Prague Czech Republic

School of Agriculture Food and Wine The University of Adelaide PMB1 Glen Osmond Adelaide 5064 Australia

К A Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences Botanicheskaya St 35 Moscow 127276 Russia and Institute of Basic Biological Problems Russian Academy of Sciences Institutskaya St 2 Pushchino Moscow Region 142290 Russia and Department of Plant Physiology Faculty of Biology M 5 Lomonosov Moscow State University Leninskie Gory 1 12 Moscow 119991 Russia and Zoology Department College of Science King Saud University Saudi Arabia and Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Matbuat Avenue 2a Baku 1073 Azerbaijan and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Institutsky lane 9 Dolgoprudny Moscow region 141700 Russia

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028262
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114153348.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1039/c9pp00369j $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32154819
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Hussain, Sajad $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
245    10
$a Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping / $c S. Hussain, T. Liu, N. Iqbal, M. Brestic, T. Pang, M. Mumtaz, I. Shafiq, S. Li, L. Wang, Y. Gao, A. Khan, I. Ahmad, SI. Allakhverdiev, W. Liu, W. Yang,
520    9_
$a Soybean (Glycine max L.) has been extensively cultivated in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems in southwest China. However, during the early co-growth period, soybean seedlings suffer from severe shading by maize resulting in lodging and significant yield reduction. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the reasons behind severe lodging and yield loss. Therefore, four different soybean genotypes (B3, B15, B23, and B24) having different agronomic characteristics were cultivated in intercropping and monocropping planting patterns. The results showed that under different planting patterns, the stem resistance varied among genotypes (P < 0.01). The lodging resistance index of B3, B15, B23, and B24 genotypes was 70.9%, 60.5%, 65.2%, and 57.4%, respectively, under intercropping, among which the B24 genotype was less affected by the shade environment as there was little decrease in the lodging resistance index of this genotype under intercropping. The lignin content of B23 and B24 was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15 under both planting patterns. Under intercropping, the hemicellulose content of B23 and B24 stems was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15. Compared to the monocropping, the content of mannose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was decreased in all genotypes except B23, but the difference was not significant. The content of xylose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was significantly higher than that in B3 and B15. Mannose content showed no significant difference among genotypes. The arabinose content of B24 was significantly higher than that of B3, B15, and B23. The effective pod number, seed number per plant, seed weight per plant and yield of soybean plants were significantly decreased under intercropping. Conclusively, manipulation of structural and nonstructural carbohydrate rich soybean genotypes in intercropping systems could alleviate the yield loss due to lodging.
650    _2
$a celulosa $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D002482
650    _2
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    _2
$a lignin $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D008031
650    _2
$a monosacharidy $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D009005
650    _2
$a stonky rostlin $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D018547
650    _2
$a polysacharidy $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D011134
650    _2
$a Glycine max $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D013025
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D013312
650    _2
$a sacharosa $x metabolismus $7 D013395
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Liu, Ting $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Iqbal, Nasir $u School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, Australia.
700    1_
$a Brestic, Marian $u Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia and Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pang, Ting $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Mumtaz, Maryam $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn.
700    1_
$a Shafiq, Iram $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Li, Shuxian $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Wang, Li $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Gao, Yang $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Khan, Aaqil $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Ahmad, Irshan $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Allakhverdiev, Suleyman I $u К.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya St. 35, Moscow 127276, Russia and Institute of Basic Biological Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya St. 2, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1-12, Moscow 119991, Russia and Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia and Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Matbuat Avenue 2a, Baku 1073, Azerbaijan and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky lane 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region 141700, Russia.
700    1_
$a Liu, Weiguo $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
700    1_
$a Yang, Wenyu $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
773    0_
$w MED00169255 $t Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology $x 1474-9092 $g Roč. 19, č. 4 (2020), s. 462-472
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32154819 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114153345 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608597 $s 1119442
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 19 $c 4 $d 462-472 $e 2020Apr15 $i 1474-9092 $m Photochemical & photobiological sciences $n Protochem. photobiol. sci. $x MED00169255
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...