-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping
S. Hussain, T. Liu, N. Iqbal, M. Brestic, T. Pang, M. Mumtaz, I. Shafiq, S. Li, L. Wang, Y. Gao, A. Khan, I. Ahmad, SI. Allakhverdiev, W. Liu, W. Yang,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
32154819
DOI
10.1039/c9pp00369j
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cellulose genetics metabolism MeSH
- Stress, Physiological genetics physiology MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Glycine max genetics metabolism MeSH
- Lignin genetics metabolism MeSH
- Monosaccharides genetics metabolism MeSH
- Polysaccharides genetics metabolism MeSH
- Sucrose metabolism MeSH
- Plant Stems genetics physiology MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Soybean (Glycine max L.) has been extensively cultivated in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems in southwest China. However, during the early co-growth period, soybean seedlings suffer from severe shading by maize resulting in lodging and significant yield reduction. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the reasons behind severe lodging and yield loss. Therefore, four different soybean genotypes (B3, B15, B23, and B24) having different agronomic characteristics were cultivated in intercropping and monocropping planting patterns. The results showed that under different planting patterns, the stem resistance varied among genotypes (P < 0.01). The lodging resistance index of B3, B15, B23, and B24 genotypes was 70.9%, 60.5%, 65.2%, and 57.4%, respectively, under intercropping, among which the B24 genotype was less affected by the shade environment as there was little decrease in the lodging resistance index of this genotype under intercropping. The lignin content of B23 and B24 was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15 under both planting patterns. Under intercropping, the hemicellulose content of B23 and B24 stems was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15. Compared to the monocropping, the content of mannose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was decreased in all genotypes except B23, but the difference was not significant. The content of xylose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was significantly higher than that in B3 and B15. Mannose content showed no significant difference among genotypes. The arabinose content of B24 was significantly higher than that of B3, B15, and B23. The effective pod number, seed number per plant, seed weight per plant and yield of soybean plants were significantly decreased under intercropping. Conclusively, manipulation of structural and nonstructural carbohydrate rich soybean genotypes in intercropping systems could alleviate the yield loss due to lodging.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028262
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114153348.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1039/c9pp00369j $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32154819
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Hussain, Sajad $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 245 10
- $a Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping / $c S. Hussain, T. Liu, N. Iqbal, M. Brestic, T. Pang, M. Mumtaz, I. Shafiq, S. Li, L. Wang, Y. Gao, A. Khan, I. Ahmad, SI. Allakhverdiev, W. Liu, W. Yang,
- 520 9_
- $a Soybean (Glycine max L.) has been extensively cultivated in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems in southwest China. However, during the early co-growth period, soybean seedlings suffer from severe shading by maize resulting in lodging and significant yield reduction. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the reasons behind severe lodging and yield loss. Therefore, four different soybean genotypes (B3, B15, B23, and B24) having different agronomic characteristics were cultivated in intercropping and monocropping planting patterns. The results showed that under different planting patterns, the stem resistance varied among genotypes (P < 0.01). The lodging resistance index of B3, B15, B23, and B24 genotypes was 70.9%, 60.5%, 65.2%, and 57.4%, respectively, under intercropping, among which the B24 genotype was less affected by the shade environment as there was little decrease in the lodging resistance index of this genotype under intercropping. The lignin content of B23 and B24 was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15 under both planting patterns. Under intercropping, the hemicellulose content of B23 and B24 stems was significantly higher than that of B3 and B15. Compared to the monocropping, the content of mannose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was decreased in all genotypes except B23, but the difference was not significant. The content of xylose in the structural carbohydrate of soybean stems was significantly higher than that in B3 and B15. Mannose content showed no significant difference among genotypes. The arabinose content of B24 was significantly higher than that of B3, B15, and B23. The effective pod number, seed number per plant, seed weight per plant and yield of soybean plants were significantly decreased under intercropping. Conclusively, manipulation of structural and nonstructural carbohydrate rich soybean genotypes in intercropping systems could alleviate the yield loss due to lodging.
- 650 _2
- $a celulosa $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D002482
- 650 _2
- $a genotyp $7 D005838
- 650 _2
- $a lignin $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D008031
- 650 _2
- $a monosacharidy $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D009005
- 650 _2
- $a stonky rostlin $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D018547
- 650 _2
- $a polysacharidy $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D011134
- 650 _2
- $a Glycine max $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D013025
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologický stres $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D013312
- 650 _2
- $a sacharosa $x metabolismus $7 D013395
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Liu, Ting $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Iqbal, Nasir $u School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, Australia.
- 700 1_
- $a Brestic, Marian $u Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia and Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pang, Ting $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Mumtaz, Maryam $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn.
- 700 1_
- $a Shafiq, Iram $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Li, Shuxian $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Wang, Li $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Gao, Yang $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Khan, Aaqil $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Ahmad, Irshan $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Allakhverdiev, Suleyman I $u К.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya St. 35, Moscow 127276, Russia and Institute of Basic Biological Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya St. 2, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1-12, Moscow 119991, Russia and Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia and Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Matbuat Avenue 2a, Baku 1073, Azerbaijan and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky lane 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region 141700, Russia.
- 700 1_
- $a Liu, Weiguo $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 700 1_
- $a Yang, Wenyu $u College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China. lwgsy@126.com mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn and Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00169255 $t Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology $x 1474-9092 $g Roč. 19, č. 4 (2020), s. 462-472
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32154819 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114153345 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608597 $s 1119442
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 19 $c 4 $d 462-472 $e 2020Apr15 $i 1474-9092 $m Photochemical & photobiological sciences $n Protochem. photobiol. sci. $x MED00169255
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105