Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Validation of lipidomic analysis of human plasma and serum by supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

D. Wolrab, M. Chocholoušková, R. Jirásko, O. Peterka, M. Holčapek,

. 2020 ; 412 (10) : 2375-2388. [pub] 20200220

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028290

Grantová podpora
18-12204S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2011-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2011-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

Ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPSFC/MS) has a great potential for the high-throughput lipidomic quantitation of biological samples; therefore, the full optimization and method validation of UHPSFC/MS is compared here with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS) in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) mode as the second powerful technique for the lipid class separation. First, the performance of six common extraction protocols is investigated, where the Folch procedure yields the best results with regard to recovery rate, matrix effect, and precision. Then, the full optimization and analytical validation for eight lipid classes using UHPSFC/MS and HILIC-UHPLC/MS methods are performed for the same sample set and applied for the lipidomic characterization of pooled samples of human plasma, human serum, and NIST SRM 1950 human plasma. The choice of appropriate internal standards (IS) for individual lipid classes has a key importance for reliable quantitative workflows illustrated by the selectivity while validation and the calculation of the quantitation error using multiple internal standards per lipid class. Validation results confirm the applicability of both methods, but UHPSFC/MS provides some distinct advantages, such as the successful separation of both non-polar and polar lipid classes unlike to HILIC-UHPLC/MS, shorter total run times (8 vs. 10.5 min), and slightly higher robustness. Various types of correlations between methods (UHPSFC/MS and HILIC-UHPLC/MS), biological material (plasma and serum), IS (laboratory and commercially mixtures), and literature data on the standard reference material show the intra- and inter-laboratory comparison in the quantitation of lipid species from eight lipid classes, the concentration differences in serum and plasma as well as the applicability of non-commercially available internal standard mixtures for lipid quantitation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028290
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114153433.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00216-020-02473-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32078000
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Wolrab, Denise $u Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Validation of lipidomic analysis of human plasma and serum by supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry / $c D. Wolrab, M. Chocholoušková, R. Jirásko, O. Peterka, M. Holčapek,
520    9_
$a Ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPSFC/MS) has a great potential for the high-throughput lipidomic quantitation of biological samples; therefore, the full optimization and method validation of UHPSFC/MS is compared here with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS) in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) mode as the second powerful technique for the lipid class separation. First, the performance of six common extraction protocols is investigated, where the Folch procedure yields the best results with regard to recovery rate, matrix effect, and precision. Then, the full optimization and analytical validation for eight lipid classes using UHPSFC/MS and HILIC-UHPLC/MS methods are performed for the same sample set and applied for the lipidomic characterization of pooled samples of human plasma, human serum, and NIST SRM 1950 human plasma. The choice of appropriate internal standards (IS) for individual lipid classes has a key importance for reliable quantitative workflows illustrated by the selectivity while validation and the calculation of the quantitation error using multiple internal standards per lipid class. Validation results confirm the applicability of both methods, but UHPSFC/MS provides some distinct advantages, such as the successful separation of both non-polar and polar lipid classes unlike to HILIC-UHPLC/MS, shorter total run times (8 vs. 10.5 min), and slightly higher robustness. Various types of correlations between methods (UHPSFC/MS and HILIC-UHPLC/MS), biological material (plasma and serum), IS (laboratory and commercially mixtures), and literature data on the standard reference material show the intra- and inter-laboratory comparison in the quantitation of lipid species from eight lipid classes, the concentration differences in serum and plasma as well as the applicability of non-commercially available internal standard mixtures for lipid quantitation.
650    _2
$a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $x metody $7 D002851
650    _2
$a superkritická fluidní chromatografie $x metody $7 D025924
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lipidomika $x metody $7 D000081362
650    _2
$a lipidy $x krev $x chemie $7 D008055
650    _2
$a hmotnostní spektrometrie $x metody $7 D013058
650    _2
$a krevní plazma $x chemie $7 D010949
650    _2
$a sérum $x chemie $7 D044967
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Chocholoušková, Michaela $u Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jirásko, Robert $u Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Peterka, Ondřej $u Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Holčapek, Michal $u Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic. Michal.Holcapek@upce.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00006638 $t Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $x 1618-2650 $g Roč. 412, č. 10 (2020), s. 2375-2388
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32078000 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114153431 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608625 $s 1119470
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 412 $c 10 $d 2375-2388 $e 20200220 $i 1618-2650 $m Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $n Anal Bioanal Chem $x MED00006638
GRA    __
$a 18-12204S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...