Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Different Bacteroides Species Colonise Human and Chicken Intestinal Tract

M. Kollarcikova, M. Faldynova, J. Matiasovicova, E. Jahodarova, T. Kubasova, Z. Seidlerova, V. Babak, P. Videnska, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,

. 2020 ; 8 (10) : . [pub] 20200927

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21002052

Grantová podpora
RVO0518 Ministerstvo Zemědělství
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007404 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

Bacteroidaceae are common gut microbiota members in all warm-blooded animals. However, if Bacteroidaceae are to be used as probiotics, the species selected for different hosts should reflect the natural distribution. In this study, we therefore evaluated host adaptation of bacterial species belonging to the family Bacteroidaceae. B. dorei, B. uniformis, B. xylanisolvens, B. ovatus, B. clarus, B. thetaiotaomicron and B. vulgatus represented human-adapted species while B. gallinaceum, B. caecigallinarum, B. mediterraneensis, B. caecicola, M. massiliensis, B. plebeius and B. coprocola were commonly detected in chicken but not human gut microbiota. There were 29 genes which were present in all human-adapted Bacteroides but absent from the genomes of all chicken isolates, and these included genes required for the pentose cycle and glutamate or histidine metabolism. These genes were expressed during an in vitro competitive assay, in which human-adapted Bacteroides species overgrew the chicken-adapted isolates. Not a single gene specific for the chicken-adapted species was found. Instead, chicken-adapted species exhibited signs of frequent horizontal gene transfer, of KUP, linA and sugE genes in particular. The differences in host adaptation should be considered when the new generation of probiotics for humans or chickens is designed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21002052
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210126092702.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/microorganisms8101483 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32992519
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kollarcikova, Miloslava $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Different Bacteroides Species Colonise Human and Chicken Intestinal Tract. / $c M. Kollarcikova, M. Faldynova, J. Matiasovicova, E. Jahodarova, T. Kubasova, Z. Seidlerova, V. Babak, P. Videnska, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
520    9_
$a Bacteroidaceae are common gut microbiota members in all warm-blooded animals. However, if Bacteroidaceae are to be used as probiotics, the species selected for different hosts should reflect the natural distribution. In this study, we therefore evaluated host adaptation of bacterial species belonging to the family Bacteroidaceae. B. dorei, B. uniformis, B. xylanisolvens, B. ovatus, B. clarus, B. thetaiotaomicron and B. vulgatus represented human-adapted species while B. gallinaceum, B. caecigallinarum, B. mediterraneensis, B. caecicola, M. massiliensis, B. plebeius and B. coprocola were commonly detected in chicken but not human gut microbiota. There were 29 genes which were present in all human-adapted Bacteroides but absent from the genomes of all chicken isolates, and these included genes required for the pentose cycle and glutamate or histidine metabolism. These genes were expressed during an in vitro competitive assay, in which human-adapted Bacteroides species overgrew the chicken-adapted isolates. Not a single gene specific for the chicken-adapted species was found. Instead, chicken-adapted species exhibited signs of frequent horizontal gene transfer, of KUP, linA and sugE genes in particular. The differences in host adaptation should be considered when the new generation of probiotics for humans or chickens is designed.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Faldynova, Marcela $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matiasovicova, Jitka $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jahodarova, Eva $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kubasova, Tereza $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Seidlerova, Zuzana $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Babak, Vladimir $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Videnska, Petra $u Faculty of Science, Masaryk's University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cizek, Alois $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00198767 $t Microorganisms $x 2076-2607 $g Roč. 8, č. 10 (2020)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32992519 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210126092658 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1614132 $s 1122336
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 8 $c 10 $e 20200927 $i 2076-2607 $m Microorganisms $n Microorganisms $x MED00198767
GRA    __
$a RVO0518 $p Ministerstvo Zemědělství
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007404 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...