• Something wrong with this record ?

Monitoring of pesticides in drinking water: finding the right balance between under- and over-monitoring - experience from the Czech Republic

F. Kotal, F. KoŽíšek, H. Jeligová, A. Vavrouš, L. Mayerová, DW. Gari, A. Moulisová

. 2021 ; 23 (2) : 311-322. [pub] 2021Mar04

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

The modern, risk-based approach requires that only those pollutants which are likely to be present in a given water supply should be monitored in drinking water. From this perspective, defining an adequate approach to the monitoring of pesticides in areas with intensive agriculture is currently one of the greatest issues of regulation. This article shows the development and detailed results of pesticide monitoring in drinking water in the Czech Republic (CR). More than 4000 water supply zones serving around a 9.5 million population are routinely monitored, with nearly 250 thousand analyses of over 200 different pesticides and their metabolites being performed every year, with a non-compliance rate of ca. 0.3%. In 2017, pesticides accounted for most derogations in the CR, concerning a total of 64 water supply systems serving more than a 250 thousand population. A representative survey targeting 21 selected chemicals showed that 75% of water supply systems contained up to 11 pesticides per sample. The most commonly found were metabolites of the herbicides used to protect oilseed rape, maize, and sugar beet: acetochlor ESA, alachlor ESA, metazachlor OA, and chloridazon-desphenyl. The health risk assessment did not reveal any risks from these chemicals, even at the highest levels detected or in the most abundant mixtures, to the most vulnerable population (infants). Nevertheless, the increased presence of pesticides undermines the public's trust in drinking water safety.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21011439
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507102108.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1039/d0em00389a $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33459735
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kotal, Filip $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
245    10
$a Monitoring of pesticides in drinking water: finding the right balance between under- and over-monitoring - experience from the Czech Republic / $c F. Kotal, F. KoŽíšek, H. Jeligová, A. Vavrouš, L. Mayerová, DW. Gari, A. Moulisová
520    9_
$a The modern, risk-based approach requires that only those pollutants which are likely to be present in a given water supply should be monitored in drinking water. From this perspective, defining an adequate approach to the monitoring of pesticides in areas with intensive agriculture is currently one of the greatest issues of regulation. This article shows the development and detailed results of pesticide monitoring in drinking water in the Czech Republic (CR). More than 4000 water supply zones serving around a 9.5 million population are routinely monitored, with nearly 250 thousand analyses of over 200 different pesticides and their metabolites being performed every year, with a non-compliance rate of ca. 0.3%. In 2017, pesticides accounted for most derogations in the CR, concerning a total of 64 water supply systems serving more than a 250 thousand population. A representative survey targeting 21 selected chemicals showed that 75% of water supply systems contained up to 11 pesticides per sample. The most commonly found were metabolites of the herbicides used to protect oilseed rape, maize, and sugar beet: acetochlor ESA, alachlor ESA, metazachlor OA, and chloridazon-desphenyl. The health risk assessment did not reveal any risks from these chemicals, even at the highest levels detected or in the most abundant mixtures, to the most vulnerable population (infants). Nevertheless, the increased presence of pesticides undermines the public's trust in drinking water safety.
650    12
$a pitná voda $x analýza $7 D060766
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a pesticidy $x analýza $7 D010575
650    12
$a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $7 D014874
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a KoŽíšek, František $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
700    1_
$a Jeligová, Hana $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
700    1_
$a Vavrouš, Adam $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
700    1_
$a Mayerová, Lenka $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
700    1_
$a Gari, Daniel W $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
700    1_
$a Moulisová, Alena $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. filip.kotal@szu.cz
773    0_
$w MED00184537 $t Environmental science. Processes & impacts $x 2050-7895 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2021), s. 311-322
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33459735 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507102108 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1649965 $s 1131818
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 23 $c 2 $d 311-322 $e 2021Mar04 $i 2050-7895 $m Environmental science. Processes & impacts $n Environ Sci Process Impacts $x MED00184537
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...