Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results

K. Jiří, V. Vladimír, A. Michal, N. Matěj, S. Silvia, V. Pavel, D. Kateřina, P. Jana, O. Barbora, R. Eliška, L. Petr, P. Matěj, G. Alexander, R. Jozef

. 2021 ; 278 (3) : 763-769. [pub] 20200704

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21011459

Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000766 European Regional Development Fund

OBJECTIVES: Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer are candidates for proton radiotherapy due to large and comprehensive target volumes, and the necessity for sparing of healthy tissues. The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment outcome and toxicity profile of patients treated with proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Jan 2013 and June 2018, 40 patients were treated for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) with IMPT (proton radiotherapy with modulated intensity). Median age was 47 years and the majority of patients had locally advanced tumors (stage 2-8 patients. (20%); stage 3-18 patients (45%); stage 4A-10 patients. (25%); stage 4B-4 patients. (10%). Median of total dose was 74 GyE (70-76 GyE) in 37 fractions (35-38). Bilateral neck irradiation was used in all cases. Concomitant chemotherapy was applied in 34 cases. (85%). Median follow-up time was 24 (1.5-62) months. RESULTS: Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were 80%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. Acute toxicity was generally mild despite large target volumes and concurrent application of chemotherapy with skin toxicity and dysphagia reported as the most frequent acute side effects. The insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrectomy (PEG) was necessary in four cases (10%). Serious late toxicity (G > 3. RTOG) was observed in two patients (5%) (dysphagia and brain necrosis). CONCLUSION: IMPT for nasopharyngeal cancer patients is feasible with mild acute toxicity. Treatment outcomes are promising despite the high percentage of advanced disease in this group.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21011459
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240902110316.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00405-020-06175-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32623508
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kubeš, Jiří $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic ; Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic ; Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic ; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results / $c K. Jiří, V. Vladimír, A. Michal, N. Matěj, S. Silvia, V. Pavel, D. Kateřina, P. Jana, O. Barbora, R. Eliška, L. Petr, P. Matěj, G. Alexander, R. Jozef
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer are candidates for proton radiotherapy due to large and comprehensive target volumes, and the necessity for sparing of healthy tissues. The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment outcome and toxicity profile of patients treated with proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Jan 2013 and June 2018, 40 patients were treated for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) with IMPT (proton radiotherapy with modulated intensity). Median age was 47 years and the majority of patients had locally advanced tumors (stage 2-8 patients. (20%); stage 3-18 patients (45%); stage 4A-10 patients. (25%); stage 4B-4 patients. (10%). Median of total dose was 74 GyE (70-76 GyE) in 37 fractions (35-38). Bilateral neck irradiation was used in all cases. Concomitant chemotherapy was applied in 34 cases. (85%). Median follow-up time was 24 (1.5-62) months. RESULTS: Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were 80%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. Acute toxicity was generally mild despite large target volumes and concurrent application of chemotherapy with skin toxicity and dysphagia reported as the most frequent acute side effects. The insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrectomy (PEG) was necessary in four cases (10%). Serious late toxicity (G > 3. RTOG) was observed in two patients (5%) (dysphagia and brain necrosis). CONCLUSION: IMPT for nasopharyngeal cancer patients is feasible with mild acute toxicity. Treatment outcomes are promising despite the high percentage of advanced disease in this group.
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a nasofaryngeální karcinom $x radioterapie $7 D000077274
650    12
$a nádory nosohltanu $x radioterapie $7 D009303
650    12
$a protonová terapie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D061766
650    _2
$a protony $7 D011522
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x škodlivé účinky $7 D050397
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vondráček, Vladimír $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic ; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Andrlík, Michal $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic. michal.andrlik@ptc.cz ; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. michal.andrlik@ptc.cz $7 xx0322119
700    1_
$a Navrátil, Matěj $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic ; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sláviková, Silvia $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vítek, Pavel $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic ; Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic ; Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dědečková, Kateřina $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prausová, Jana $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ondrová, Barbora $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rotnáglová, Eliška $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lukeš, Petr $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Patzelt, Matěj $u Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic ; Department of Plastic Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00, Praha 10, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grebenyuk, Alexander $u Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Lva Tolstogo 6-8, 197020, Saint Petersburg, Russia
700    1_
$a Rosina, Jozef $u Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic ; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009617 $t European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology $x 1434-4726 $g Roč. 278, č. 3 (2021), s. 763-769
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32623508 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240902110314 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1649983 $s 1131838
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 278 $c 3 $d 763-769 $e 20200704 $i 1434-4726 $m European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology $n Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00009617
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000766 $p European Regional Development Fund
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...