• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

J. Silvain, B. Lattuca, F. Beygui, G. Rangé, Z. Motovska, JG. Dillinger, Z. Boueri, P. Brunel, T. Lhermusier, C. Pouillot, E. Larrieu-Ardilouze, F. Boccara, JN. Labeque, P. Guedeney, M. El Kasty, M. Laredo, R. Dumaine, G. Ducrocq, JP. Collet, G....

. 2020 ; 396 (10264) : 1737-1744. [pub] 20201114

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21011836
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Family Health Database (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 1992-01-04 do Před 3 měsíci

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related myonecrosis is frequent and can affect the long-term prognosis of patients. To our knowledge, ticagrelor has not been evaluated in elective PCI and could reduce periprocedural ischaemic complications compared with clopidogrel, the currently recommended treatment. The aim of the ALPHEUS study was to examine if ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis in stable coronary patients undergoing high-risk elective PCI. METHODS: The ALPHEUS study, a phase 3b, randomised, open-label trial, was done at 49 hospitals in France and Czech Republic. Patients with stable coronary artery disease were eligible for the study if they had an indication for PCI and at least one high-risk characteristic. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter for 30 days) or clopidogrel (300-600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter for 30 days) by use of an interactive web response system, and stratified by centre. The primary outcome was a composite of PCI-related type 4 (a or b) myocardial infarction or major myocardial injury and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, both of which were evaluated within 48 h of PCI (or at hospital discharge if earlier). The primary analysis was based on all events that occurred in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617290. FINDINGS: Between Jan 9, 2017, and May 28, 2020, 1910 patients were randomly assigned at 49 sites, 956 to the ticagrelor group and 954 to the clopidogrel group. 15 patients were excluded from the ticagrelor group and 12 from the clopidogrel group. At 48 h, the primary outcome was observed in 334 (35%) of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group and 341 (36%) of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio [OR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·17; p=0·75). The primary safety outcome did not differ between the two groups, but minor bleeding events were more frequently observed with ticagrelor than clopidogrel at 30 days (105 [11%] of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group vs 71 [8%] of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group; OR 1·54, 95% CI 1·12-2·11; p=0·0070). INTERPRETATION: Ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis after elective PCI and did not cause an increase in major bleeding, but did increase the rate of minor bleeding at 30 days. These results support the use of clopidogrel as the standard of care for elective PCI. FUNDING: ACTION Study Group and AstraZeneca.

3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Cardiocentre Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

ACTION Study Group Cardiology Department Nîmes University Hospital Montpellier University Nîmes France

ACTION Study Group Département de Cardiologie CH de Bastia Bastia France

ACTION Study Group Département de Cardiologie CHU de Caen Caen France

ACTION Study Group Unité de Recherche Clinique Hôpital Fernand Widal Paris France

AP HP Hôpitaux de l'Est Parisien Hôpital Saint Antoine Department of Cardiology Sorbonne Université INSERM UMR S_938 Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine Paris France

Département de Cardiologie CH de Chartres Chartres France

Département de Cardiologie CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

Département de Cardiologie Clinique Sainte Clotilde La Réunion France

Département de Cardiologie Grand Hôpital de l'Est Francilien site Marne La Vallée Marne la Vallée France

GCS de Cardiologie de la Côte Basque CH Bayonne Bayonne France

Hôpital Privé Dijon Bourgogne Cardiologie Interventionelle GCIDB VALMY Dijon France

Les Grands Prés Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre Villeneuve St Denis France

Service de Cardiologie CHU de Poitiers Poitiers France

Sorbonne Université ACTION Study Group INSERM UMRS1166 Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France

Statistique Analyse et Modélisation Multidisciplinaire EA 4543 Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Paris France

Université de Paris Department of Cardiology Lariboisière Hospital Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris INSERM U942 Paris France

Université de Paris Hôpital Bichat AP HP French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials INSERM U1148 Paris France

University Hospital Brno Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21011836
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507103412.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32236-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33202219
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Silvain, Johanne $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
245    10
$a Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial / $c J. Silvain, B. Lattuca, F. Beygui, G. Rangé, Z. Motovska, JG. Dillinger, Z. Boueri, P. Brunel, T. Lhermusier, C. Pouillot, E. Larrieu-Ardilouze, F. Boccara, JN. Labeque, P. Guedeney, M. El Kasty, M. Laredo, R. Dumaine, G. Ducrocq, JP. Collet, G. Cayla, K. Blanchart, P. Kala, E. Vicaut, G. Montalescot, ALPHEUS investigators
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related myonecrosis is frequent and can affect the long-term prognosis of patients. To our knowledge, ticagrelor has not been evaluated in elective PCI and could reduce periprocedural ischaemic complications compared with clopidogrel, the currently recommended treatment. The aim of the ALPHEUS study was to examine if ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis in stable coronary patients undergoing high-risk elective PCI. METHODS: The ALPHEUS study, a phase 3b, randomised, open-label trial, was done at 49 hospitals in France and Czech Republic. Patients with stable coronary artery disease were eligible for the study if they had an indication for PCI and at least one high-risk characteristic. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter for 30 days) or clopidogrel (300-600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter for 30 days) by use of an interactive web response system, and stratified by centre. The primary outcome was a composite of PCI-related type 4 (a or b) myocardial infarction or major myocardial injury and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, both of which were evaluated within 48 h of PCI (or at hospital discharge if earlier). The primary analysis was based on all events that occurred in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617290. FINDINGS: Between Jan 9, 2017, and May 28, 2020, 1910 patients were randomly assigned at 49 sites, 956 to the ticagrelor group and 954 to the clopidogrel group. 15 patients were excluded from the ticagrelor group and 12 from the clopidogrel group. At 48 h, the primary outcome was observed in 334 (35%) of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group and 341 (36%) of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio [OR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·17; p=0·75). The primary safety outcome did not differ between the two groups, but minor bleeding events were more frequently observed with ticagrelor than clopidogrel at 30 days (105 [11%] of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group vs 71 [8%] of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group; OR 1·54, 95% CI 1·12-2·11; p=0·0070). INTERPRETATION: Ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis after elective PCI and did not cause an increase in major bleeding, but did increase the rate of minor bleeding at 30 days. These results support the use of clopidogrel as the standard of care for elective PCI. FUNDING: ACTION Study Group and AstraZeneca.
650    _2
$a klopidogrel $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077144
650    _2
$a elektivní chirurgické výkony $7 D017558
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a koronární angioplastika $x škodlivé účinky $7 D062645
650    12
$a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D010975
650    _2
$a purinergní receptory P2Y - antagonisté $x terapeutické užití $7 D058921
650    _2
$a ticagrelor $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077486
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Lattuca, Benoit $u ACTION Study Group, Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, Nîmes, France
700    1_
$a Beygui, Farzin $u ACTION Study Group, Département de Cardiologie, CHU de Caen, Caen, France
700    1_
$a Rangé, Grégoire $u Département de Cardiologie, CH de Chartres, Chartres, France
700    1_
$a Motovska, Zuzana $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Cardiocentre Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dillinger, Jean-Guillaume $u Université de Paris, Department of Cardiology, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM U942, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Boueri, Ziad $u ACTION Study Group, Département de Cardiologie, CH de Bastia, Bastia, France
700    1_
$a Brunel, Philippe $u Hôpital Privé Dijon Bourgogne-Cardiologie Interventionelle GCIDB VALMY, Dijon, France
700    1_
$a Lhermusier, Thibault $u Département de Cardiologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
700    1_
$a Pouillot, Christophe $u Département de Cardiologie, Clinique Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France
700    1_
$a Larrieu-Ardilouze, Elisa $u Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
700    1_
$a Boccara, Franck $u AP-HP, Hôpitaux de l'Est Parisien, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Department of Cardiology, Sorbonne Université-INSERM UMR S_938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Labeque, Jean-Noël $u GCS de Cardiologie de la Côte Basque, CH Bayonne, Bayonne, France
700    1_
$a Guedeney, Paul $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a El Kasty, Mohamad $u Département de Cardiologie, Grand Hôpital de l'Est Francilien site Marne-La-Vallée, Marne-la-Vallée, France
700    1_
$a Laredo, Mikael $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a Dumaine, Raphaëlle $u Les Grands Prés Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre, Villeneuve St Denis, France
700    1_
$a Ducrocq, Grégory $u Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT), INSERM U1148, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Collet, Jean-Philippe $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a Cayla, Guillaume $u ACTION Study Group, Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, Nîmes, France
700    1_
$a Blanchart, Katrien $u ACTION Study Group, Département de Cardiologie, CHU de Caen, Caen, France
700    1_
$a Kala, Petr $u University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vicaut, Eric $u ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Fernand Widal (AP-HP), Paris, France; Statistique, Analyse et Modélisation Multidisciplinaire EA 4543, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Montalescot, Gilles $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France. Electronic address: gilles.montalescot@aphp.fr
710    2_
$a ALPHEUS investigators
773    0_
$w MED00010161 $t Lancet (London, England) $x 1474-547X $g Roč. 396, č. 10264 (2020), s. 1737-1744
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33202219 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507103410 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650264 $s 1132215
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 396 $c 10264 $d 1737-1744 $e 20201114 $i 1474-547X $m Lancet $n Lancet $x MED00010161
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...