Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Mindfulness-Based Programs for Patients With Cancer via eHealth and Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Quantitative Research

J. Matis, M. Svetlak, A. Slezackova, M. Svoboda, R. Šumec

. 2020 ; 22 (11) : e20709. [pub] 20201116

Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21011868

BACKGROUND: eHealth mindfulness-based programs (eMBPs) are on the rise in complex oncology and palliative care. However, we are still at the beginning of answering the questions of how effective eMBPs are and for whom, and what kinds of delivery modes are the most efficient. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to examine the feasibility and efficacy of eMBPs in improving the mental health and well-being of patients with cancer, to describe intervention characteristics and delivery modes of these programs, and to summarize the results of the included studies in terms of moderators, mediators, and predictors of efficacy, adherence, and attrition. METHODS: In total, 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge) were searched using relevant search terms (eg, mindfulness, program, eHealth, neoplasm) and their variations. No restrictions were imposed on language or publication type. The results of the efficacy of eMBPs were synthesized through the summarizing effect estimates method. RESULTS: A total of 29 published papers describing 24 original studies were included in this review. In general, the results indicate that eMBPs have the potential to reduce the levels of stress, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep problems, and pain, and improve the levels of mindfulness, posttraumatic growth, and some parameters of general health. The largest median of Cohen d effect sizes were observed in reducing anxiety and depression (within-subject: median -0.38, IQR -0.62 to -0.27; between-group: median -0.42, IQR -0.58 to -0.22) and facilitating posttraumatic growth (within-subject: median 0.42, IQR 0.35 to 0.48; between-group: median 0.32, IQR 0.22 to 0.39). The efficacy of eMBP may be comparable with that of parallel, face-to-face MBPs in some cases. All studies that evaluated the feasibility of eMBPs reported that they are feasible for patients with cancer. Potential moderators, mediators, and predictors of the efficacy, attrition, and adherence of eMBPs are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of the reviewed studies were highly heterogeneous, the review provides evidence that eMBPs are an appropriate way for mindfulness practice to be delivered to patients with cancer. Thus far, existing eMBPs have mostly attempted to convert proven face-to-face mindfulness programs to the eHealth mode. They have not yet fully exploited the potential of eHealth technology.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21011868
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425145749.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2196/20709 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33196452
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Matis, Juraj $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0300699
245    10
$a Mindfulness-Based Programs for Patients With Cancer via eHealth and Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Quantitative Research / $c J. Matis, M. Svetlak, A. Slezackova, M. Svoboda, R. Šumec
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: eHealth mindfulness-based programs (eMBPs) are on the rise in complex oncology and palliative care. However, we are still at the beginning of answering the questions of how effective eMBPs are and for whom, and what kinds of delivery modes are the most efficient. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to examine the feasibility and efficacy of eMBPs in improving the mental health and well-being of patients with cancer, to describe intervention characteristics and delivery modes of these programs, and to summarize the results of the included studies in terms of moderators, mediators, and predictors of efficacy, adherence, and attrition. METHODS: In total, 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge) were searched using relevant search terms (eg, mindfulness, program, eHealth, neoplasm) and their variations. No restrictions were imposed on language or publication type. The results of the efficacy of eMBPs were synthesized through the summarizing effect estimates method. RESULTS: A total of 29 published papers describing 24 original studies were included in this review. In general, the results indicate that eMBPs have the potential to reduce the levels of stress, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep problems, and pain, and improve the levels of mindfulness, posttraumatic growth, and some parameters of general health. The largest median of Cohen d effect sizes were observed in reducing anxiety and depression (within-subject: median -0.38, IQR -0.62 to -0.27; between-group: median -0.42, IQR -0.58 to -0.22) and facilitating posttraumatic growth (within-subject: median 0.42, IQR 0.35 to 0.48; between-group: median 0.32, IQR 0.22 to 0.39). The efficacy of eMBP may be comparable with that of parallel, face-to-face MBPs in some cases. All studies that evaluated the feasibility of eMBPs reported that they are feasible for patients with cancer. Potential moderators, mediators, and predictors of the efficacy, attrition, and adherence of eMBPs are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of the reviewed studies were highly heterogeneous, the review provides evidence that eMBPs are an appropriate way for mindfulness practice to be delivered to patients with cancer. Thus far, existing eMBPs have mostly attempted to convert proven face-to-face mindfulness programs to the eHealth mode. They have not yet fully exploited the potential of eHealth technology.
650    _2
$a hodnotící studie jako téma $7 D005069
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a všímavost $x metody $7 D064866
650    _2
$a nádory $x psychologie $7 D009369
650    _2
$a telemedicína $x metody $7 D017216
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Svetlak, Miroslav $u Department of Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Slezackova, Alena $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Marek $u Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šumec, Rastislav, $u Department of Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1990- $7 xx0264187
773    0_
$w MED00007388 $t JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $x 1438-8871 $g Roč. 22, č. 11 (2020), s. e20709
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33196452 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425145746 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650287 $s 1132247
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 22 $c 11 $d e20709 $e 20201116 $i 1438-8871 $m JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $n J Med Internat Res $x MED00007388
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...