Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Differences and commonalities in plasma membrane recruitment of the two morphogenetically distinct retroviruses HIV-1 and MMTV

P. Junková, R. Pleskot, J. Prchal, J. Sýs, T. Ruml

. 2020 ; 295 (26) : 8819-8833. [pub] 20200508

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Retroviral Gag polyproteins are targeted to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane through their N-terminal matrix (MA) domain. Because retroviruses of different morphogenetic types assemble their immature particles in distinct regions of the host cell, the mechanism of MA-mediated plasma membrane targeting differs among distinct retroviral morphogenetic types. Here, we focused on possible mechanistic differences of the MA-mediated plasma membrane targeting of the B-type mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) and C-type HIV-1, which assemble in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane, respectively. Molecular dynamics simulations, together with surface mapping, indicated that, similarly to HIV-1, MMTV uses a myristic switch to anchor the MA to the membrane and electrostatically interacts with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to stabilize MA orientation. We observed that the affinity of MMTV MA to the membrane is lower than that of HIV-1 MA, possibly related to their different topologies and the number of basic residues in the highly basic MA region. The latter probably reflects the requirement of C-type retroviruses for tighter membrane binding, essential for assembly, unlike for D/B-type retroviruses, which assemble in the cytoplasm. A comparison of the membrane topology of the HIV-1 MA, using the surface-mapping method and molecular dynamics simulations, revealed that the residues at the HIV-1 MA C terminus help stabilize protein-protein interactions within the HIV-1 MA lattice at the plasma membrane. In summary, HIV-1 and MMTV share common features such as membrane binding of the MA via hydrophobic interactions and exhibit several differences, including lower membrane affinity of MMTV MA.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012446
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507104631.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011991 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32385109
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Junková, Petra $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Differences and commonalities in plasma membrane recruitment of the two morphogenetically distinct retroviruses HIV-1 and MMTV / $c P. Junková, R. Pleskot, J. Prchal, J. Sýs, T. Ruml
520    9_
$a Retroviral Gag polyproteins are targeted to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane through their N-terminal matrix (MA) domain. Because retroviruses of different morphogenetic types assemble their immature particles in distinct regions of the host cell, the mechanism of MA-mediated plasma membrane targeting differs among distinct retroviral morphogenetic types. Here, we focused on possible mechanistic differences of the MA-mediated plasma membrane targeting of the B-type mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) and C-type HIV-1, which assemble in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane, respectively. Molecular dynamics simulations, together with surface mapping, indicated that, similarly to HIV-1, MMTV uses a myristic switch to anchor the MA to the membrane and electrostatically interacts with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to stabilize MA orientation. We observed that the affinity of MMTV MA to the membrane is lower than that of HIV-1 MA, possibly related to their different topologies and the number of basic residues in the highly basic MA region. The latter probably reflects the requirement of C-type retroviruses for tighter membrane binding, essential for assembly, unlike for D/B-type retroviruses, which assemble in the cytoplasm. A comparison of the membrane topology of the HIV-1 MA, using the surface-mapping method and molecular dynamics simulations, revealed that the residues at the HIV-1 MA C terminus help stabilize protein-protein interactions within the HIV-1 MA lattice at the plasma membrane. In summary, HIV-1 and MMTV share common features such as membrane binding of the MA via hydrophobic interactions and exhibit several differences, including lower membrane affinity of MMTV MA.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a buněčná membrána $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D002462
650    _2
$a HIV infekce $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D015658
650    _2
$a HIV-1 $x fyziologie $7 D015497
650    _2
$a interakce hostitele a patogenu $7 D054884
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a virus myšího tumoru prsní žlázy $x fyziologie $7 D008324
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a molekulární modely $7 D008958
650    _2
$a retrovirové infekce $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D012192
650    _2
$a infekce onkogenními viry $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D014412
650    _2
$a sestavení viru $7 D019065
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Pleskot, Roman $u Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Prchal, Jan $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sýs, Jakub $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ruml, Tomáš $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.ruml@vscht.cz
773    0_
$w MED00002546 $t The Journal of biological chemistry $x 1083-351X $g Roč. 295, č. 26 (2020), s. 8819-8833
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32385109 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507104629 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650752 $s 1132825
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 295 $c 26 $d 8819-8833 $e 20200508 $i 1083-351X $m The Journal of biological chemistry $n J Biol Chem $x MED00002546
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...