• Something wrong with this record ?

Traditional sets versus rest-redistribution: a laboratory-controlled study of a specific cluster set configuration at fast and slow velocities

JJ. Tufano, D. Omcirk, J. Malecek, A. Pisz, M. Halaj, BR. Scott

. 2020 ; 45 (4) : 421-430. [pub] 20190925

Language English Country Canada

Document type Journal Article

This study investigated redistributing long inter-set rest intervals into shorter but more frequent intervals at 2 different concentric velocities. Resistance-trained men performed 4 randomised isokinetic unilateral knee extension protocols, 2 at 60°·s-1 and 2 at 360°·s-1. At each speed, subjects performed 40 repetitions with 285 s of rest using traditional sets (TS; 4 sets of 10 with 95 s of inter-set rest) and rest-redistribution (RR; 20 sets of 2 with 15 s inter-set rest). Before and at 2, 5, and 10 min after exercise, tensiomyography (TMG) and oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy; NIRS) were measured. NIRS was also measured during exercise, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded after every 10 repetitions. At both speeds, RR displayed greater peak torque, total work, and power output during latter repetitions, but there were no differences between TS or RR when averaging all 40 repetitions. The RPE was less during RR at both speeds (p < 0.05). RR increased select muscle oxygen saturation and blood flow at both speeds. There were no effects of protocol on TMG, but effect sizes favoured a quicker recovery after RR. RR was likely beneficial in maintaining performance compared with the latter parts of TS sets and limiting perceived and peripheral fatigue. Novelty Although effective at slow velocities, rest-redistribution was likely more effective during high-velocity movements in this study. Rest-redistribution maintained the ability to produce force throughout an entire range of motion. Rest-redistribution reduced RPE during both high-velocity and high-force movements.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012726
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507101606.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1139/apnm-2019-0584 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31553890
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Tufano, James J $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Traditional sets versus rest-redistribution: a laboratory-controlled study of a specific cluster set configuration at fast and slow velocities / $c JJ. Tufano, D. Omcirk, J. Malecek, A. Pisz, M. Halaj, BR. Scott
520    9_
$a This study investigated redistributing long inter-set rest intervals into shorter but more frequent intervals at 2 different concentric velocities. Resistance-trained men performed 4 randomised isokinetic unilateral knee extension protocols, 2 at 60°·s-1 and 2 at 360°·s-1. At each speed, subjects performed 40 repetitions with 285 s of rest using traditional sets (TS; 4 sets of 10 with 95 s of inter-set rest) and rest-redistribution (RR; 20 sets of 2 with 15 s inter-set rest). Before and at 2, 5, and 10 min after exercise, tensiomyography (TMG) and oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy; NIRS) were measured. NIRS was also measured during exercise, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded after every 10 repetitions. At both speeds, RR displayed greater peak torque, total work, and power output during latter repetitions, but there were no differences between TS or RR when averaging all 40 repetitions. The RPE was less during RR at both speeds (p < 0.05). RR increased select muscle oxygen saturation and blood flow at both speeds. There were no effects of protocol on TMG, but effect sizes favoured a quicker recovery after RR. RR was likely beneficial in maintaining performance compared with the latter parts of TS sets and limiting perceived and peripheral fatigue. Novelty Although effective at slow velocities, rest-redistribution was likely more effective during high-velocity movements in this study. Rest-redistribution maintained the ability to produce force throughout an entire range of motion. Rest-redistribution reduced RPE during both high-velocity and high-force movements.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a svalová únava $x fyziologie $7 D018763
650    _2
$a svalová síla $x fyziologie $7 D053580
650    _2
$a kondiční příprava $x metody $7 D064797
650    _2
$a tělesná námaha $x fyziologie $7 D005082
650    _2
$a odporový trénink $x metody $7 D055070
650    _2
$a odpočinek $x fyziologie $7 D012146
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Omcirk, Dan $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Malecek, Jan $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pisz, Anna $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Halaj, Matej $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Track and Field, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Comenius University in Bratislava, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Scott, Brendan R $u College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Discipline of Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia $u Murdoch Applied Sports Science Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia
773    0_
$w MED00172613 $t Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme $x 1715-5320 $g Roč. 45, č. 4 (2020), s. 421-430
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31553890 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507101606 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650981 $s 1133105
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 45 $c 4 $d 421-430 $e 20190925 $i 1715-5320 $m Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism $n Appl Physiol Nutr Metab $x MED00172613
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...