• Something wrong with this record ?

One-year follow-up after urethroplasty, with the focus on both lower urinary tract and erectile function

D. Míka, J. Krhut, K. Ryšánková, R. Sýkora, L. Luňáček, P. Zvara

. 2020 ; 54 (2) : 150-154. [pub] 20200312

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21012767

Background: Urethral stricture disease (USD) represents a complex urological problem. Urethroplasty is considered the gold standard for the treatment of USD. Most available studies report outcome data obtained from retrograde urethrography and uroflowmetry. Only a limited number of papers describe the effect of urethroplasty on erectile function and their results are inconsistent. The goal of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of urethroplasty on both lower urinary tract and erectile function using objective parameters and standardized patient-reported outcome measurement tools.Materials and Methods: A total of 55 consecutive patients with USD were enrolled into the study. Patients underwent ventral onlay urethroplasty, urethroplasty according to the Asopa technique, dorsal onlay urethroplasty, cutaneous flap urethroplasty using the Orandi technique or anastomotic repair. All patients were evaluated using uroflowmetry, urethrography, the PROM-USS questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire (IIEF-5) pre-operatively and consequently post-op, in 3-month intervals. This study presents the comparison of baseline pre-op parameters and parameters 12 months after the surgery using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance.Results: A significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters, all domains of the PROM-USS questionnaire, as well as the overall score of the IIEF-5 was observed. No statistically significant differences between sub-groups were found when comparing treatment results in patients with short versus long strictures and patients with penile urethra stricture versus bulbar or membranous urethra stricture.Conclusions: Urethroplasty yielded very good functional results with respect to both lower urinary tract and erectile functions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012767
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507104323.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/21681805.2020.1734077 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32162569
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Míka, David $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
245    10
$a One-year follow-up after urethroplasty, with the focus on both lower urinary tract and erectile function / $c D. Míka, J. Krhut, K. Ryšánková, R. Sýkora, L. Luňáček, P. Zvara
520    9_
$a Background: Urethral stricture disease (USD) represents a complex urological problem. Urethroplasty is considered the gold standard for the treatment of USD. Most available studies report outcome data obtained from retrograde urethrography and uroflowmetry. Only a limited number of papers describe the effect of urethroplasty on erectile function and their results are inconsistent. The goal of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of urethroplasty on both lower urinary tract and erectile function using objective parameters and standardized patient-reported outcome measurement tools.Materials and Methods: A total of 55 consecutive patients with USD were enrolled into the study. Patients underwent ventral onlay urethroplasty, urethroplasty according to the Asopa technique, dorsal onlay urethroplasty, cutaneous flap urethroplasty using the Orandi technique or anastomotic repair. All patients were evaluated using uroflowmetry, urethrography, the PROM-USS questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire (IIEF-5) pre-operatively and consequently post-op, in 3-month intervals. This study presents the comparison of baseline pre-op parameters and parameters 12 months after the surgery using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance.Results: A significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters, all domains of the PROM-USS questionnaire, as well as the overall score of the IIEF-5 was observed. No statistically significant differences between sub-groups were found when comparing treatment results in patients with short versus long strictures and patients with penile urethra stricture versus bulbar or membranous urethra stricture.Conclusions: Urethroplasty yielded very good functional results with respect to both lower urinary tract and erectile functions.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a erekce penisu $7 D010410
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a uretra $x fyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D014521
650    _2
$a striktura uretry $x chirurgie $7 D014525
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $x fyziologie $7 D001743
650    _2
$a urologické chirurgické výkony u mužů $x metody $7 D013521
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Krhut, Jan $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ryšánková, Kateřina $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sýkora, Radek $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Luňáček, Libor $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zvara, Peter $u Biomedical Laboratory and Research Unit of Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark $u Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
773    0_
$w MED00193240 $t Scandinavian journal of urology $x 2168-1813 $g Roč. 54, č. 2 (2020), s. 150-154
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32162569 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507104322 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1651014 $s 1133146
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 54 $c 2 $d 150-154 $e 20200312 $i 2168-1813 $m Scandinavian journal of urology $n Scand J Urol $x MED00193240
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options