-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Porcine Study
J. Horak, L. Nalos, V. Martinkova, V. Tegl, L. Vistejnova, J. Kuncova, M. Kohoutova, D. Jarkovska, M. Dolejsova, J. Benes, M. Stengl, M. Matejovic
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2010
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2010
PubMed
32117276
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2020.00126
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- modely nemocí na zvířatech MeSH
- náhodné rozdělení MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- sepse terapie MeSH
- transplantace mezenchymálních kmenových buněk metody MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Background: Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has elicited considerable interest as an adjunctive therapy in sepsis. However, the encouraging effects of experiments with MSC in rodents have not been adequately studied in large-animal models with better relevance to human sepsis. Objectives: Here, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs in a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive peritonitis-induced sepsis. Methods: Thirty-two anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 8 per group): (1) sham-operated group (CONTROL); (2) sham-operated group treated with MSCs (MSC-CONTROL); (3) sepsis group with standard supportive care (SEPSIS); and (4) sepsis group treated with MSCs (MSC-SEPSIS). Peritoneal sepsis was induced by inoculating cultivated autologous feces. MSCs (1 × 106/kg) were administered intravenously at 6 h after sepsis induction. Results: Before, 12, 18, and 24 h after the induction of peritonitis, we measured systemic, regional, and microvascular hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, mitochondrial energy metabolism, systemic immune-inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. Administration of MSCs in the MSC-CONTROL group did not elicit any measurable acute effects. Treatment of septic animals with MSCs failed to mitigate sepsis-induced hemodynamic alterations or the gradual rise in Sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores. MSCs did not confer any protection against sepsis-mediated cellular myocardial depression and mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs also failed to modulate the deregulated immune-inflammatory response. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs to healthy animals was well-tolerated. However, in this large-animal, clinically relevant peritonitis-induced sepsis model, MSCs were not capable of reversing any of the sepsis-induced disturbances in multiple biological, organ, and cellular systems.
1st Medical Department Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czechia
Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czechia
Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Biomedical Center Charles University Pilsen Czechia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21012866
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210507102247.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210420s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00126 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32117276
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Horak, Jan $u First Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Porcine Study / $c J. Horak, L. Nalos, V. Martinkova, V. Tegl, L. Vistejnova, J. Kuncova, M. Kohoutova, D. Jarkovska, M. Dolejsova, J. Benes, M. Stengl, M. Matejovic
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has elicited considerable interest as an adjunctive therapy in sepsis. However, the encouraging effects of experiments with MSC in rodents have not been adequately studied in large-animal models with better relevance to human sepsis. Objectives: Here, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs in a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive peritonitis-induced sepsis. Methods: Thirty-two anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 8 per group): (1) sham-operated group (CONTROL); (2) sham-operated group treated with MSCs (MSC-CONTROL); (3) sepsis group with standard supportive care (SEPSIS); and (4) sepsis group treated with MSCs (MSC-SEPSIS). Peritoneal sepsis was induced by inoculating cultivated autologous feces. MSCs (1 × 106/kg) were administered intravenously at 6 h after sepsis induction. Results: Before, 12, 18, and 24 h after the induction of peritonitis, we measured systemic, regional, and microvascular hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, mitochondrial energy metabolism, systemic immune-inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. Administration of MSCs in the MSC-CONTROL group did not elicit any measurable acute effects. Treatment of septic animals with MSCs failed to mitigate sepsis-induced hemodynamic alterations or the gradual rise in Sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores. MSCs did not confer any protection against sepsis-mediated cellular myocardial depression and mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs also failed to modulate the deregulated immune-inflammatory response. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs to healthy animals was well-tolerated. However, in this large-animal, clinically relevant peritonitis-induced sepsis model, MSCs were not capable of reversing any of the sepsis-induced disturbances in multiple biological, organ, and cellular systems.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace mezenchymálních kmenových buněk $x metody $7 D045164
- 650 _2
- $a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
- 650 _2
- $a sepse $x terapie $7 D018805
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Nalos, Lukas $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Martinkova, Vendula $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Third Department of Surgery, University Hospital Motol and First Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Tegl, Vaclav $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Vistejnova, Lucie $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kuncova, Jitka $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kohoutova, Michaela $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovska, Dagmar $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Dolejsova, Martina $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Benes, Jan $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Stengl, Milan $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Matejovic, Martin $u First Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Biomedical Center, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181405 $t Frontiers in immunology $x 1664-3224 $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 126
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32117276 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210420 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210507102246 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1651109 $s 1133245
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 126 $e 20200207 $i 1664-3224 $m Frontiers in immunology $n Front Immunol $x MED00181405
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210420