Higher survival following transplantation with a mismatched unrelated donor with posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis than with double unit umbilical cord blood in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

. 2024 Dec ; 99 (12) : 2296-2305. [epub] 20240831

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39215605

Grantová podpora
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS

The best donor option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients lacking an HLA-matched donor has remained intensively debated. We herein report the results of a large retrospective registry study comparing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes between double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (dCBT, n = 209) versus 9/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (UD) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (UD 9/10, n = 270) in patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1). Inclusion criteria consisted of adult patient, AML in CR1 at transplantation, either peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from UD 9/10 with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis or dCBT without PTCy, transplantation between 2013 and 2021, and no in vivo T-cell depletion. The 180-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 29% in UD 9/10 versus 44% in dCBT recipients (p = .001). After adjustment for covariates, dCBT recipients had a higher non-relapse mortality (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48; p = .01), comparable relapse incidence (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.67-1.86; p = .66), lower leukemia-free survival (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.01-2.23; p = .047), and lower overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.08-2.55; p = .02) compared with patients receiving UD 9/10 HCT. In summary, our results suggest that transplantation outcomes are better with UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis than with dCBT for AML patients in CR1. These data might support the use of UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis over dCBT in AML patients lacking an HLA-matched donor.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Baron F, Efficace F, Cannella L, et al. Impact of the type of anthracycline and of stem cell transplantation in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: long‐term follow up of a phase III study. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:749‐758. doi:10.1002/ajh.25795

Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140(12):1345‐1377. doi:10.1182/blood.2022016867

Baron F, Labopin M, Ruggeri A, et al. Impact of donor type in patients with AML given allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after low‐dose TBI‐based regimen. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(12):2794‐2803. doi:10.1158/1078‐0432.CCR‐17‐3622

Nagler A, Mohty M. In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant? Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022;2022(1):64‐73. doi:10.1182/hematology.2022000327

Nagler A, Labopin M, Dholaria B, et al. Comparison of Haploidentical bone marrow versus matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in patients with acute leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(3):843‐851. doi:10.1158/1078‐0432.CCR‐20‐2809

Fuchs EJ, O'Donnell PV, Eapen M, et al. Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA‐haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial. Blood. 2021;137(3):420‐428. doi:10.1182/blood.2020007535

Kanakry CG, Fuchs EJ, Luznik L. Modern approaches to HLA‐haploidentical blood or marrow transplantation. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(2):132. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.234

McCurdy SR, Radojcic V, Tsai HL, et al. Signatures of GVHD and relapse after post‐transplant cyclophosphamide revealed by immune profiling and machine learning. Blood. 2022;139(4):608‐623. doi:10.1182/blood.2021013054

Baron F, Labopin M, Tischer J, et al. GVHD occurrence does not reduce AML relapse following PTCy‐based haploidentical transplantation: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):10. doi:10.1186/s13045‐023‐01403‐x

Ritacco C, Cem Kose M, Courtois J, et al. Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide prevents xenogeneic graft‐versus‐host disease while depleting proliferating regulatory T cells. iScience. 2023;26(3):106085. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106085

Battipaglia G, Labopin M, Kröger N, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs antithymocyte globulin in HLA‐mismatched unrelated donor transplantation. Blood. 2019;134(11):892‐899. doi:10.1182/blood.2019000487

Baron F, Ruggeri A, Beohou E, et al. RIC versus MAC UCBT in adults with AML: a report from Eurocord, the ALWP and the CTIWP of the EBMT. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):43027‐43038. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9599

Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft‐versus‐host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL‐A‐matched sibling donors. Transplantation. 1974;18(4):295‐304. doi:10.1097/00007890‐197410000‐00001

Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)‐specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106(8):2912‐2919. doi:10.1182/blood‐2005‐05‐2004

Poiani M, Labopin M, Battipaglia G, et al. The impact of cytogenetic risk on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: on behalf of the acute leukemia working party (ALWP) of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). Am J Hematol. 2021;96(1):40‐50. doi:10.1002/ajh.26000

Rodríguez‐Arbolí E, Labopin M, Tischer J, et al. FLAMSA‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning in younger patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia with active disease at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: an analysis from the acute leukemia working party of the European society for blood and marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(11):2165‐2173. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.020

Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Ciceri F, Mohty M, Nagler A. Definition of GvHD‐free, relapse‐free survival for registry‐based studies: an ALWP‐EBMT analysis on patients with AML in remission. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(4):610‐611. doi:10.1038/bmt.2015.305

Kanate AS, Nagler A, Savani B. Summary of scientific and statistical methods, study endpoints and definitions for observational and registry‐based studies in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Hematol Int. 2019;2(1):2‐4. doi:10.2991/chi.d.191207.001

Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Savani BN, et al. Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55:1114‐1125. doi:10.1038/s41409‐020‐0803‐y

Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Gedde‐Dahl T, et al. Validation of the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) index for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024;59(2):217‐223. doi:10.1038/s41409‐023‐02139‐5

Andersen PK, Klein JP, Zhang MJ. Testing for centre effects in multi‐centre survival studies: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects tests. Stat Med. 1999;18(12):1489‐1500. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097‐0258(19990630)18:12<1489::aid‐sim140>3.0.co;2‐#

Ruggeri A, Galimard JE, Labopin M, et al. Comparison of outcomes after unrelated double‐unit cord blood and haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia: a study on behalf of Eurocord and the acute leukemia working party of the European society for blood and marrow transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(10):710.e1‐710.e10. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.006

Baron F, Labopin M, Tischer J, et al. Comparison of HLA‐mismatched unrelated donor transplantation with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA‐haploidentical transplantation in patients with active acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022;57(11):1657‐1663. doi:10.1038/s41409‐022‐01781‐9

Battipaglia G, Galimard JE, Labopin M, et al. Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide in one‐antigen mismatched unrelated donor transplantation versus haploidentical transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022;57(4):562‐571. doi:10.1038/s41409‐022‐01577‐x

Baron F, Ruggeri A, Beohou E, et al. Single‐ or double‐unit UCBT following RIC in adults with AL: a report from Eurocord, the ALWP and the CTIWP of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):128. doi:10.1186/s13045‐017‐0497‐9

Pascal L, Mohty M, Ruggeri A, et al. Impact of rabbit ATG‐containing myeloablative conditioning regimens on the outcome of patients undergoing unrelated single‐unit cord blood transplantation for hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(1):45‐50. doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.216

Baron F, Ruggeri A, Beohou E, et al. Occurrence of graft‐versus‐host disease increases mortality after umbilical cord blood transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia: a report from Eurocord and the ALWP of the EBMT. J Intern Med. 2018;283(2):178‐189. doi:10.1111/joim.12696

Admiraal R, Nierkens S, Bierings MB, et al. Individualised dosing of anti‐thymocyte globulin in paediatric unrelated allogeneic haematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (PARACHUTE): a single‐arm, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(2):e111‐e120. doi:10.1016/S2352‐3026(21)00375‐6

Harnicar S, Ponce DM, Hilden P, et al. Intensified mycophenolate mofetil dosing and higher mycophenolic acid trough levels reduce severe acute graft‐versus‐host disease after double‐unit cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(5):920‐925. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.024

Verneris MR, Brunstein CG, Barker J, et al. Relapse risk after umbilical cord blood transplantation: enhanced graft‐versus‐leukemia effect in recipients of 2 units. Blood. 2009;114(19):4293‐4299. doi:10.1182/blood‐2009‐05‐220525

Barker J, Hanash A. Cord blood T cells are “completely different”. Blood. 2015;126(26):2778‐2779. doi:10.1182/blood‐2015‐11‐675504

Lamers CHJ, Wijers R, van Bergen CAM, et al. CD4+ T‐cell alloreactivity toward mismatched HLA class II alleles early after double umbilical cord blood transplantation. Blood. 2016;128(17):2165‐2174. doi:10.1182/blood‐2016‐06‐718619

Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, et al. Cord‐blood transplantation in patients with minimal residual disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):944‐953. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1602074

Baron F, Labopin M, Ruggeri A, et al. Impact of detectable measurable residual disease on umbilical cord blood transplantation. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(9):1057‐1065. doi:10.1002/ajh.25879

Dholaria B, Labopin M, Sanz J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with cord blood versus mismatched unrelated donor with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):76. doi:10.1186/s13045‐021‐01086‐2

Labopin M, Ruggeri A, Gorin NC, et al. Cost‐effectiveness and clinical outcomes of double versus single cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia in France. Haematologica. 2014;99(3):535‐540. doi:10.3324/haematol.2013.092254

Kim NV, McErlean G, Yu S, Kerridge I, Greenwood M, Lourenco RDA. Healthcare resource utilization and cost associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a scoping review. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024;30(5):542.e1‐542.e29. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.084

Horwitz ME, Stiff PJ, Cutler C, et al. Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study. Blood. 2021;138(16):1429‐1440. doi:10.1182/blood.2021011719

Cohen S, Roy J, Lachance S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using single UM171‐expanded cord blood: a single‐arm, phase 1‐2 safety and feasibility study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(2):e134‐e145. doi:10.1016/S2352‐3026(19)30202‐9

Bolaños EA, Bonneville EF, Robin M, et al. HLA mismatching and transplant outcome in the Ptcy era: a comprehensive study by the EBMT cellular therapy and immunobiology working party. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024;30(2):S21‐S22. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.063

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...