Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy using Penumbra ACETM Aspiration Catheter Compared to Stent Retriever SolitaireTM FR in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

D. Sila, M. Lenski, M. Vojtková, M. Elgharbawy, F. Charvát, S. Rath

. 2021 ; 11 (4) : . [pub] 20210416

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. METHODS: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. RESULTS: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. CONCLUSIONS: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21017944
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210729104058.0
007      
ta
008      
210726s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/brainsci11040504 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33923489
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Sila, Dalibor $u Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau-Isar Klinikum, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
245    10
$a Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy using Penumbra ACETM Aspiration Catheter Compared to Stent Retriever SolitaireTM FR in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke / $c D. Sila, M. Lenski, M. Vojtková, M. Elgharbawy, F. Charvát, S. Rath
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. METHODS: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. RESULTS: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. CONCLUSIONS: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lenski, Markus $u Neurosurgical Clinic, Campus Grosshadern, Clinic of the University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Vojtková, Maria $u Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economic Informatics, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemska cesta 1/b, 85235 Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Elgharbawy, Mustafa $u Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Donau-Isar Klinikum, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
700    1_
$a Charvát, František $u Radiodiagnostic Departement, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 16902 Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rath, Stefan $u Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau-Isar Klinikum, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00198694 $t Brain sciences $x 2076-3425 $g Roč. 11, č. 4 (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33923489 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20210726 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210729104057 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1676475 $s 1138386
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 11 $c 4 $e 20210416 $i 2076-3425 $m Brain sciences $n Brain Sci $x MED00198694
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210726

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...