• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A randomized clinical trial of technical modifications of appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis

P. Ihnát, M. Tesař, L. Tulinský, L. Ihnát Rudinská, O. Okantey, Š. Durdík

. 2021 ; 21 (1) : 272. [pub] 20210531

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018548

BACKGROUND: Closure of the appendix stump presents the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the medical outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to the different methods of stump closure. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted in a single institution (University Hospital Ostrava) within a 2-year study period. All included patients were randomized into one of three trial arms (endoloop, hem-o-lok clips or endostapler). RESULTS: In total, 180 patients (60 patients in each arm) were enrolled into the study. The mean length of hospital stay (3.6 ± 1.7 days) was comparable in all study arms. The shortest operative time was noted in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients (37.9 ± 12.5 min). Superficial surgical site infection was detected in 4.4% of study patients; deep surgical site infection was noted in 1.7% of the patients. The frequency of surgical site infections was comparable in all study arms (p = 0.7173). The mean direct costs of laparoscopic appendectomy were significantly the lowest in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy is not a profit-making procedure in our institution (mean profit of made from the study patients was-104.3 ± 579.2 Euro). Closure of the appendix stump by means of endostapler presents the most expensive and the highest loss-incurring technique (p = 0.0072). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that all technical modifications of appendix stump closure are comparable with regards to postoperative complications. The stapler technique is significantly the most expensive. We concluded that hem-o-lok clips have the potential for becoming the preferred method of securing the appendix base during laparoscopic appendectomy. Trial registration NCT03750032 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018548
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100128.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12893-021-01279-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34059039
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Ihnát, Peter $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic. peterihnat@yahoo.com
245    12
$a A randomized clinical trial of technical modifications of appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis / $c P. Ihnát, M. Tesař, L. Tulinský, L. Ihnát Rudinská, O. Okantey, Š. Durdík
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Closure of the appendix stump presents the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the medical outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to the different methods of stump closure. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted in a single institution (University Hospital Ostrava) within a 2-year study period. All included patients were randomized into one of three trial arms (endoloop, hem-o-lok clips or endostapler). RESULTS: In total, 180 patients (60 patients in each arm) were enrolled into the study. The mean length of hospital stay (3.6 ± 1.7 days) was comparable in all study arms. The shortest operative time was noted in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients (37.9 ± 12.5 min). Superficial surgical site infection was detected in 4.4% of study patients; deep surgical site infection was noted in 1.7% of the patients. The frequency of surgical site infections was comparable in all study arms (p = 0.7173). The mean direct costs of laparoscopic appendectomy were significantly the lowest in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy is not a profit-making procedure in our institution (mean profit of made from the study patients was-104.3 ± 579.2 Euro). Closure of the appendix stump by means of endostapler presents the most expensive and the highest loss-incurring technique (p = 0.0072). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that all technical modifications of appendix stump closure are comparable with regards to postoperative complications. The stapler technique is significantly the most expensive. We concluded that hem-o-lok clips have the potential for becoming the preferred method of securing the appendix base during laparoscopic appendectomy. Trial registration NCT03750032 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
650    _2
$a apendektomie $7 D001062
650    12
$a apendicitida $x chirurgie $7 D001064
650    12
$a apendix $7 D001065
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a laparoskopie $7 D010535
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Tesař, Milan $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tulinský, Lubomír $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia $u Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic $u Department of Oncosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Commenius University Bratislava, Spitalska 24, Bratislava, 813 72, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Okantey, Okaikor $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Durdík, Štefan $u Department of Oncosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Commenius University Bratislava, Spitalska 24, Bratislava, 813 72, Slovakia
773    0_
$w MED00008207 $t BMC surgery $x 1471-2482 $g Roč. 21, č. 1 (2021), s. 272
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34059039 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100129 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689595 $s 1138994
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 21 $c 1 $d 272 $e 20210531 $i 1471-2482 $m BMC surgery $n BMC Surg $x MED00008207
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace